THE GRAND LODGE OF NEW ZEALAND.

———<>———

MATTERS Masonic will be active in Invercargill

during the coming week, as some hundreds of

brethren will assemble in connection with the annual

meeting of the G.L. of New Zealand. This meeting

will derive much of its importance from the fact that

the headship will change. G.M., M.W. Bro.

Herdman will surrender the sceptre with the cares of

office, and M.W. Bro. T. Ross will reign in his

stead. The interest of southern brethren will be

enhanced from the fact that the office for

administering the affairs of G L., which has been

located in Wellington for the past two years, will take up its quarters in Dunedin, and govern the Craft from

that city for the ensuing term. In Wellington the administration, under the presidency of V.W. Bro. J. J.

Esson, has run very smoothly, and for a time the members of the B. of G. P. will miss the pleasant monthly

meetings, where so much harmony prevailed. It is always difficult to prognosticate what course these annual

meetings will take, and instances have occurred when an apparently colourless programme has induced

stirring debates. Probably it is the wisdom that develops from the great multitude of councillors. So far as the

ordinary eye can see, the agenda to be submitted at Invercargill does not lend itself to exhaustive oratory.

The principle involved in the change of season for holding G.L. appears to have been recognised, though

there may be a difference of opinion as to the selection of the month which the change will necessitate.

Every care should be taken to avoid conflict with meetings of other organisations, as even in the cities hotel

accommodation is limited, and the service in these times is invariably uncertain. The recommendation of the

Board with reference to the secretarial staff may be responsible for various expressions of opinion, but it

must not be forgotten that the work of the chief executive officer has nearly doubled since the position was

last reviewed, and the revolution in monetary values has been so great that what formerly enabled the

indulgence of luxury will now barely suffice to provide more than the ordinary necessaries of life. If there is

one institution than can afford to be not only just, but also a little generous to those who serve it well, it is

that of Freemasonry. We rely on G.L. fully recognising the complete evolution of the world's position, and

the exigencies that follow in ordinary sequence. The question of the recognition of French Freemasonry

induced some discussion at the communication of 1918, for which we think sentiment was largely

responsible. Since then there has been a change in the relations with France, which has considerably

modified sentiment, and in consideration of all the circumstances we are of opinion that the report of the

Board amply meets the case at the present time. In connection with the report of the Annuity Board, we are

entirely opposed to the decision arrived at with regard to annuitants, and the alternative proposal discussed

by the Board is not correctly stated. The report says :—"The question of using a certain portion of the capital

sum was considered, etc.," which can only lead to one inference, viz., the diversion of a portion of the

existing capital amount of the fund was intended. No such proposal was made, and the fact was twice

emphasised. The proposal was that a moiety of future contributions be appropriated to increase the present

annuities, thus leaving the present capital sum un-touched, which is quite a different matter. We hope to be

pardoned for our temerity in holding that no practical attempt has been made to improve the position of our

annuitants. If the purchasing power of the sovereign is the same with them as with the rest of the population

of New Zealand, then the annuities granted are only of half the value as formerly, while the statement that

individual cases are treated on their merit is but a poor platitude. It has been argued that annuitants have

never complained, but we presume it was never anticipated that they would adopt common custom and strike

to indicate their desire to have annuities increased. The whole thing lies in a nutshell. Either the former

annuities were too lavish (Heaven save the mark), or existing ones are insufficient. We hold to the latter

view, and will continue contending for the illustration of our cardinal principle, charity, in its practical form,

especially in regard to the aged and distressed. There is another matter that may be opportunely referred to

with the peripatetic change of office, and which has been discussed-on previous occasions. We refer to the

government of the Craft under the jurisdiction of the G.L. of New Zealand out of session. Our reference is

specially to the B. of G.P. and its constitution. Unlike any other institution that we are cognisant of, in

Freemasonry or out of it, the whole of the members of all the administrative boards cease their functions at

the end of each biennial term, and an entirely new set is elected in their stead, having no knowledge of any

kind of any of the business bequeathed to them by their predecessors. In limited liability companies, for

example, legislation is specially enacted to prevent anything of this kind, and to preserve a continuity of

office. In other Masonic jurisdictions the entire membership of the governing boards do not cease their

functions simultaneously. The reason for this practice in the G.L. of New Zealand is owing to its change of

office location every two years. Yet, as it has been previously pointed out, it would not present any great

difficulty to change the system so as to provide for a continuity in the constitution of the governing bodies,

and which should prove very much more satisfactory to the whole jurisdiction. The primary reasons which

caused a complete reversal in the constitution of G.L. apply with equal force to the authorities which govern

the jurisdiction out of session. The N.Z. CRAFTSMAN offers its congratulations to the incoming G.M.,

expressing the hope that his reign may be honourable to himself and beneficial to the Craft:

————————

THE VICTORIAN LABOUR PARTY AND FREEMASONRY.

———<>———

Since the complete evolution of the Labour Party, which has taken place all over the world during the last

twenty years, and the dissemination of its various policy measures, no attempt has been made until recently

to come into contact or cause any friction with Freemasonry. Hitherto it has been recognised that

Freemasonry is a humanitarian institution, noted for its unostentatious philanthropy, its general good works,

and for its abstention from the discussion of all religious and political topics. It is quite well-known that

Masonic membership is not limited to any particular class, and no institution can claim such diversity in the

occupations of its members as Freemasonry, while its relief funds have been operated upon more generally in

favour of that class who hitherto have been presumed not to have such a sufficiency of this world's goods as

some of their more fortunate fellows. This fact alone should have been sufficient—if only as a matter of

worldly policy—to have secured the immunity of Freemasonry from any attacks by the Labour Party. The

Victorians, however, have thought differently, and are entitled to the responsibility of having initiated

proceedings. In March last a conference was held, and the agenda was published through the columns of the

newspaper press. The second item read as follows :— " That no person be eligible for membership of the

party who belongs to the Order of Freemasons, which is recognised as an international capitalistic and

monarchistic society." Though the diction of the clause is so deplorable, it is not difficult to understand its

intention, which is to prohibit persons who are attached to the Victorian Labour Party from joining the

institution of Freemasonry. Caustic comment could be offered in this connection, but we will charitably

refrain. The reasons that are presumably responsible for this ukase are so enigmatical in construction that

their meaning can only be assumed. What an "international capitalistic and monarchistic secret society" is,

we are not prepared to say, but omitting the word "international," which has no conjunctive meaning, it may

be assumed that the Victorian Labour Party "recognises" Freemasonry as a secret society fortunate enough to

possess much capital. It is deeply to be regretted that Freemasonry cannot claim in any sense to come within

this category. The bulk of its members, if not absolutely poor, are certainly not in any sense capitalists. They

may be rich in good works, which even the Victorian Labour Party might emulate without in any way being

entitled to the suspicion that its members were possessed of a surplusage of filthy lucre.

A "monarchistic" secret society is another puzzler. Monarchism is defined as "love or preference of

monarchy." "The principles of monarchy." So that if the phrase means anything it is that Freemasonry is a

secret society whose mission is to uphold the principles of monarchy and thrones. And though this may be

quite clear to the Victorian Labour Party, it only serves to show how obscured its vision is, which is not by

any means an extraordinary condition. True it is that Freemasonry is bound to respect law and order—which

may be almost accounted a crime in these days—and to be loyal to the head of the country to which it owes

allegiance, whether that head be king or president, and may that loyalty long endure. But it must not be

forgotten, if our ritual traditions have any value, that the charge referring to loyalty formed part of the

earliest ritual of about 1726, when kings reigned in every country. But the word "king " is not used in the

ritual, "sovereign" is the term employed, and this is clearly defined in dictionaries as "a supreme ruler," "the

person having the highest power or authority in a state," which scarcely applies to kings in these days. But

both the prefix and context of the clause in the charge imply an allegiance to the country and its laws. In any

case, the language of this old charge must be susceptible to a liberal interpretation, especially in these

modern times. In the said programme submitted to the conference there were a number of most extraordinary

planks, which we are not called to comment upon, but the last paragraph may be produced, if only for its

superb illogicality :—

"The initiation of advanced propaganda to convince the so-called middle classes that their interests are

identical with those of the general body of workers."

The admission that the propaganda is "advanced" is naive in the extreme, but is the least calculated to

convince the "so-called" middle classes, of any literature that has been published outside of Russia.

————————

THE VISIT OF THE PRINCE OF WALES.

———<>———

In pre-war days when globe-trotting was reduced to a science, it was a frequent boast as to the short time in

which the tour of the whole of New Zealand has been accomplished. But the visit of the Prince of Wales bids

fair to establish a record. Thirty days from Auckland to the Bluff and back to Lytteltor for final departure,

visiting all large towns and stopping for a few minutes at most of the smaller ones, should furnish material

for a Gilbertian opera. Were it not that Freemasonry is directly affected by the grotesque arrangement, we

could afford to join with the thousands who will watch the farcical and mismanaged proceedings with

wondering eyes, and who resent the large expenditure that is being incurred at a most inopportune time to

obtain such a small result.

The Prince of Wales is a very young Freemason, and judging from his remarks on his admission, he very

greatly appreciated the honour. That being so, it follows as a natural sequence that he would have greatly

esteemed the opportunity of meeting large numbers of his brethren at a suitably arranged Masonic function.

But that is impossible because TIME DOES NOT PERMIT, which can be quite understood seeing that he is

debarred from spending more than two days in the Capital City and its environs. Various Masonic addresses

are being engrossed in different towns in the hope that five minutes may be filched from the official

programme to stealthily thrust an occasional one into his haud. The G.L. of New Zealand has its one

prepared, which has been approved by the Mighty Censor, whoever he may be, hut no arrangement has been

made for its presentation. As the Prince is to stay one whole week in Christchurch, efforts will be made to

present it there, but it is quite certain that there will be no time for the assemblage of the brethren from the

whole Dominion. No doubt the function —if it can be so designated—will be hurriedly convened, and some

of the "distinguished" will attend, but the brethren generally will have no opportunity of greeting their

younger brother and future King. Possibly the projected hurried "run through" the Dominion was arranged in

England, but if, as we presume, it has been acquiesced in here, no perspicacity and little common sense is

evidenced in accepting such an arrangement.

———————————————————————————————————————————

News and Notes.
———————————————————————————————————————————

AT the March meeting of the Rapehu R.A. Chapter at Marton the degrees of Royal Ark Mariner and Red

Cross Knights were worked in their entirety, and conferred on twelve candidates. The presiding officer

throughout was. R.E. Comp. W. H. Smith, P.G.J., and V.E. Comps. W. R. Snellgrove and N. Neilsen took

the duties of conductor, the former in the Ark Mariner and the Knights of the Sword and Knights of the East,

and the latter in the Knight Masons of Jerusalem, V.E. Comp. A. J. Gould giving valuable assistance in the

various other offices.

THE attendance at the Installed Masters' Lodge of Wellington on 6th April was most gratifying, and is an

indication that the usefulness of this school for Masonic instruction is becoming more appreciated by

Wellington brethren, for whom it was established. W. Bro. H. H. Seaton presided. A discussion was taken on

a paper read at the previous meeting by Bro. J. Courtney Greer, and quite a number of brethren participated.

Another paper was read, the subject taken being "Some Every-day Masonic Problems," and the discussion

will be taken at the June meeting. A resolution of sorrow at the death of W. Bro. George Allport was

adopted, the "Dead March" being appropriately played by Bro. Greer.

WE heartily commend the practice of some Lodge secretaries in sending the list of new Lodge officers, for

change of advertisement, on a separate sheet, as it makes for accuracy and precision.

We regret to note that Mrs. Fletcher, widow of the late Bro. Robert Fletcher, a P.D.G.M. of the G.L. of N.Z.,

died in London on the 31st January last. Mrs. Fletcher had gone home for the benefit of her health, and

presumably the rigorous English winter had proved fatal to her constitution, already enfeebled by delicate

health.

R.W. BRO. WILLIAM HANDLEY, Prov G.M. of the Scottish Constitution of Freemasons, Auckland, has for

several months been suffering from a severe attack of rheumatism.

M.W. BRO. J. J. DOUGALL, P.G.M., of Christchurch, left. New Zealand last month, accompanied by his two

daughters, for Australia, and purposes spending some time in Melbourne, Brisbane, and Sydney. For some

little time the health of our distinguished brother has not been quite satisfactory. We hope rest and change of

scene will effect a complete restoration.

A VERY pleasant and unique function took place at the new Esperanto Hall, Tory Street, Wellington, on 15th

April, when a large number of the personal friends of Bro. E. Howell assembled to bid him and Mrs. Howell

au revoir. Bro. W. L. Edmanson occupied the chair, and in a happy mood referred to the high esteem in

which "Ted" was held by so many worthy Masons. Every brother present joined in the pæan of praise struck

by Bro. Edmanson, and a small presentation (a case of pipes) was made by Bro. McIntosh on behalf of the

company. All present prophesied that the guest of the evening would soon be back again, and in his reply he

half hinted that such was quite possible. The new hall was specially decorated for the occasion, and the

seating occupied the form of a circle, with a beautiful New Zealand fern as that point within, from which all

parts without are equidistant, for it may be truly said that all were equal there, with no jarring note to mar the

harmony of the gathering. Bros. Ryder, Wadham, Adams, Munt, C. Bell, and V. McKenzie contributed to a

fine programme.

WE deeply regret to learn that M.E. Comp. Rev. T. Porritt, who is now residing at Greytown, became

somewhat seriously indisposed on a journey to Wellington last month, where he proposed attending two

Masonic functions. He received the kind ministrations of Bro. Geo. Russell, but it was deemed desirable that

he should return to his home, which he did the following day-. The Masonic meetings he proposed attending

were the poorer for his absence. It is hoped that rest and care will restore our venerable brother to his normal

condition.

THE new Lodge Omaranui occupies a novel position in that eight of its officers are P.Ms. The usual trouble

in a new Lodge is a paucity of brethren holding this rank.

SOME of our Lodges, more than others, recognise the fraternal bond by suitably noticing the domestic

happenings in the home circles of their members, with sympathy, condolences, or congratulations as the

occasion may demand. In the recently published balance-sheet of a country Lodge in Taranaki there appear

items amounting to over £20 for wedding presents: to three brethren, and it is noticeable and fitting that

double value went to the one who has come back from the war with honourable scars. Nor does this Lodge

fail to do its full share when charity calls, while a very modest sum indicates that proceedings in the

refectory are kept well within bounds.

THE 12th of August next is the centenary of the establishment of Freemasonry in Australia, and the G.L. of

N.S. W. is taking steps to fittingly celebrate the occasion.

MANY Taranaki brethren will remember Bro. E. W. Rosenberg, the Plevna veteran, who was living in New

Plymouth for a time in the earlier years of the century. This brother, who is an ardent Freemason and a

skilled musician, went to the Argentine and thence to Peru, where he has long been resident. Since 1913 Bro.

Rosenberg has been a member of Unity Lodge, No 1109, S.C., located at Lima, in which he holds office as

Organist. Writing recently to R. W. Bro. F. P. Corkill, he says : "We have a good Lodge here, but I have seen

better in New Zealand. I often think back to our visits to the little towns in Taranaki, with you as Installing

Master." He sends the last installation programme of "Unity," giving the toast list, which differs greatly from

what we are used to in this country. The first sentiment is "The King, the Queen, Queen Alexandra, the Duke

of Rothesay, and other members of the Royal Family, and the President of the United States." Next, " The

G.L. of Scotland and M.W. the G.M." Then "The G.L. of Peru" and "The Land we Live in," " Sister Lodges

in South America.," "Officers, Past and Present." "Visiting Lodges and Brethren" and "The Tyler's Toast"

completes the list. Our Scotch brethren in Peru seemingly have forgotten England and Ireland, and it needs

some thinking to recognise in "The Duke of Rothesay " the heir to the throne, the Prince of Wales. A toast

list of only eight items after a Scotch installation is surely something new, but perhaps there were some

extras.

M.E. COMP. T. HOBSON, 1st G.Prin. of R.A. Masonry in New Zealand visited the Chapters in the

Taranaki District last month and took part in the installation of Principals of Egmont Chapter, which
ceremony was conducted by R.E, Comp. A. J. Graham, G.H., who is in charge of the district.

M.E. COMP. S. SCOTT-YOUNG, the 1st G.Prin, of the G.R.A. Chapter of N.S.W., who has been

appointed as the representative of the G. Chapter of New Zealand near the G. Chapter of N.S.W., was
presented with his commission at the quarterly convocation held on the 11th February, and saluted.

INFORMATION has come to hand, since we have one to press, that M.W. Bro. A. L. Herdman, G.M., will be

unable to preside at the meeting of G.L., as he has to attend the Court of Appeal in Wellington on the 3rd

proximo, owing to the illness of Justice Hosking. M.W. Bro. M. Thompson, who resides in Invercargill, will

preside.

————————

SOUTHLAND NOTES.

———<>———

Lodge Fortitude is sharing in the general Masonic activity. At the last meeting one E. A.F. was passed, and a

candidate was elected. Two proposals were received, W. Bro. Harbord is nearing the end of his term.

  

W. Bro. E. Parker, the veteran Sec. of Lodge. Fortitude, is making a change in his business engagement,

transferring to Invercargill towards the end of April. It is Bro. Parker's intention to continue residence at

Bluff, so the Lodge will, for the time being, at any rate, have the benefit of his continued services.

  

The March meeting of Lodge St. John was one of the largest regular meetings held in Invercargill for quite a

while, there being a big attendance of members and visitors from all parts.

  

Advantage was taken of the occasion to present W. Bro. J. Smith, W.M. Lodge Maungawhao, No. 168, with

a P.M.'s jewel. Bro. Smith is in the Government service, and has been transferred to Invercargill before the

completion of his term as W.M. The pleasing duty of presenting the jewel was entrusted to R.W. Bro. W.

Smith, who did full justice to the occasion, giving a thorough Masonic welcome to his namesake. W. Bro. J.

Smith suitably replied, and stated his intention of early affiliating with one of the local Lodges as soon as he

became settled.

  

The dispensing of harmony at after meetings during the long period of mourning has been much commented

on. It appears to many as being quite unnecessary to prolong the formalities to the exclusion of social

pleasantries. In any case, we should believe that our late brother has ascended to the G.L. above, therefore

why the anomaly of marking the occasion with a period of three months' gloom ?

  

R.W. Bro. A. le H. Hoyles and Bro. J. McCrostie are busy with choir and orchestral practices respectively,

preparing for G.L. communication. Excellent musical enjoyment is confidently expected.

  

Lodge Victoria is losing one of its most attentive and energetic P.Ms. in W. Bro. S. Craig, who has disposed

of his business in Invercargill, and is moving to Whangarei. W. Bro. Craig will carry with him the best of

H.G.W. from all the brethren here, he being an old and popular resident of the town.

  

W. Bro. L. L. Padget, W.M., has announced that the May meeting of Southern Cross will be a "ladies'

evening." A musical programme is being arranged. As this meeting will be held on Friday, 7th May, it

should prove a fitting conclusion to G.L. festivities.

  

A token of the popularity of W. Bro. A. Greig was the very large number of brethren who attended the

meeting of Lodge Victoria on Friday, 9th April, this being the last regular meeting over which the W.M.

would preside. Occasion was taken in the refectory, to make a presentation to Bro. Greig. In asking the W.M.

to accept gifts from the members of his Lodge, W. Bro. A. A. Geddes made deservedly complimentary

references to the whole-hearted manner in which Bre. Greig had undertaken and carried out his important

duties. He wished him every success in Napier, whither he was removing, in the hope that the northern

climate would be beneficial to his wife's health. Bro. Geddes was sure that Bro. Greig would receive a warm

Masonic welcome in Napier, and he trusted the fraternity there would have the benefit of his continued

active interest in all matters relating to the welfare of the beloved Craft. W. Bro. Greig replied in a

thoroughly appreciative and grateful address. He regretted being unable to complete his term as W.M. and

I.P.M., and could only excuse himself by saying that he had had every good intention of doing so when

installed last June. A marked feature was the large number of Lodges represented, and of the number of older

brethren present. Lodge Victoria meetings are always well attended, but undoubtedly on this occasion the big

gathering was due to a great extent to the fact that W. Bro. Greig was being honoured.

———————————————————————————————————————————

N.Z.E.F. MASONIC ASSOCIATION.

———<>———

A meeting of the Dunedin Branch of the N.Z.E.F. Masonic Association was held in the Masonic Hall, Moray

Place, on 10th April, with a good attendance. W. Bro. Oxley delivered an address on "Charity," and this was

listened to with closest attention. We are indeed grateful to our esteemed brother for the interpretation and

instruction conveyed in his address, and see anticipate the time when he will be able to address us again. The

resignation of W. Bro. Anderson from the executive was received with regret, Bro. Anderson having

removed to Nelson. W. Bro. D. White, one of the "founders" of the association in France, was elected a

member of the executive. A considerable discussion on the question of membership followed, and the

meeting was of the unanimous opinion that the time was opportune for a Dominion Conference of

representatives from the various branches to deal with the important business that was gathering up, and also

to lay good and true foundations for the future development of the Association in New Zealand. An

invitation from the Installed Masters' Lodge was accepted, and we anticipate a pleasant and profitable

evening. After the business an adjournment was made for supper, and loyal toasts were honoured. These

meetings form a happy opportunity for the brethren to renew former pleasant relationships, and to talk over

places and brethren we have seen or met while on the great business of the Empire. Several new members

were enrolled, and our branch may claim to be an enthusiastic one. Suggestions were made for the formation

of a branch library, official visits 'to Lodges and lectures for future meetings—[Communicated.]

————————

ROLL OF HONOUR UNVEILED.

———<>———

The members of Lodge Cromwell Kil., No. 98, Otago, accompanied by relatives and lady friends, assembled

in the Masonic Hall, Cromwell, on the 21st March for the purpose of witnessing the unveiling of a Roll of

Honour to the memory of the brethren who, at the country's call, went forth to fight and die for the cause of

liberty and justice.

R.W. Bro. Flett, Prov.G.M., R.W. Bros. Watts and Fieldwick, and W. Bro. W. G. Hay were present.

The proceedings opened by the W.M., Bro. Partridge, stating the object of the gathering. The hymn "O God,

our help in ages past" was followed by Bro. Chaplain offering up prayer. R.W. Bro. Flett gave an address,

taking for his subject "The Great War and Freemasons' part therein," which was listened to with marked

attention and appreciation. Then followed an appropriate selection by the orchestra. The unveiling of the Roll

of Honour was in the capable hands of W. Bro. Dr. Shore, I.P:M., who delivered a most inspiring address,

paying ta beautiful tribute to those brethren who made the supreme sacrifice, and his words of thanksgiving

for those who had been spared to return were received with deep fervour. 'The address was followed by Bro.

D. C. Jolly, who sang "Nearer my God to Thee" most impressively. R.W. Bro. Watt spoke on Freemasonry,

and Bro. Chaplain offered up prayer. W. Bro. Hay followed with an address, "The War and Its Results."

making feeling reference to the fallen brethren. R.W. Bro. Fieldwick also spoke, paying a high tribute to the

women of Britain and her Dominions for the great work they accomplished during the war. The hymn

"Abide with me" closed a most impressive ceremony.—[Contributed.]

————————

SOME EVERYDAY MASONIC PROBLEMS.

———<>———

[By W. W. BRO. HERBERT J. WILLIAMS. Read at the Installed Masters' Lodge, of Wellington.]

An opinion has been voiced on more than one occasion that literary Lodges, in their selection of subjects,

discriminate rather too freely in favour of the archaic or abstruse, to the exclusion of others of more practical

Masonic moment. It is urged—and perhaps not illogically—that, while it may be extremely interesting to

burrow into the mysteries of past ages and to obtain a variety of opinions as to the antiquity of Speculative

Freemasonry and kindred subjects, the result of the addresses or the discussions are not of much practical

value, as they lead to nothing definite and have no finality. Thus in all ages we have had the most brilliant

Masonic minds writing on these subjects, and the work still goes on. For months past the Masonic press has

been flooded with lectures, addresses, and essays on the origin or antiquity of Freemasonry, but little that is

new has been evolved. In many instances writers have so inextricably mixed the operative and speculative

that it is little wonder that the Masonic student finds the position hopelessly obscure. Add to this the fact that

the conclusions of such eminent writers as Hughan, Gould, Speth, Parker, Dr. Oliver, Preston, Dr.

Churchward, and others are so diametrically opposed, and that the estimated age of speculative Freemasonry

is variously given as five hundred thousand years, or that it originated with the creation of the world, from

the Tower of Babel, the building of King Solomon's Temple, from the Roman Collegia, or from the

establishment of the G.L. of England in 1717 ; one may be pardoned the suggestion that the discussion of

this and kindred subjects Serves little practical purpose where light is desired, and is scarcely an educative

Masonic medium. As I have been a sinner in this connection myself, I have less hesitation in thus referring to

the matter. I therefore propose this evening to direct your attention to several ordinary everyday matters,

some of which may not be capable of solution, but upon which a free discussion will be generally welcomed,

and may he productive of results.

UNATTACHED FREEMASONS.

The first subject I submit for your consideration is the evergreen, but elusive, "Unattached Freemason," and

though it is not so prominent a matter for discussion in these prosperous times as formerly, the evil is still in

our midst, and is being accentuated by the large number of arrivals from the Home Country, about whom

very little is heard in our assemblies, but very much can at times be learnt privately, especially when

applications are made for assistance, or information is asked for by strangers, in which connection I am very

constantly approached. If we accept past experience; it may seem as unprofitable to discuss this as it is the

"Antiquity of Freemasonry," if only for the reason that hitherto no reliable information has been obtained

either as to the number of this army, the reasons that influence permanent demissions, or how to minimise

the evil in the future. But this need not derogate from the importance of the question. The "Masonic Journal

of South Africa" pertinently asks, " What shall it profit a Lodge to make fifty Masons in a year, if twenty-

five of them never appear in the Lodge after they are raised?" Many reasons have been advanced as to the

cause of the unattached, some of which may be noted as "Unsatisfied curiosity," "Inefficiency of officers

conferring degrees," "Unsuitable admissions," "Inability to appreciate Masonic teaching," "Arrears of dues,"

etc., etc. Though any of these reasons may offer a correct solution, they are purely conjectural, which has

rendered past efforts to obtain statistical information nugatory. Some years since the G.Sec. of the G.L. of

New Zealand compiled a return for a period of eight years, with the object of forming an approximate

estimate of the number of the unattached from New Zealand Lodges for that period. To obtain a result he

added the number of resignations (3,150) to the number struck off (1,121), which gave a total of 4,271. From

this were deducted the number of members who rejoined (2,087) and the number who became founders of

new Lodges (949), which left a difference of 1,245. But I do not think this was quite a correct calculation, as

my experience is that 75 per cent. of the founders of new Lodges are contributing members. Then, again.

Bro. Niccol's figures made no reference to new arrivals from foreign jurisdictions, the majority of whom are

unknown. These arrivals have been especially large since the termination of the war.

While it will always be impossible to avoid the unattached, it is quite possible to ascertain the cause of

defection, and, as prevention is better than cure, steps could be taken to get at the root of the evil. Each

Lodge under the G.L. of New Zealand is required to keep a register of members, which is very complete, and

there would be no difficulty in adding one more column giving the cause of demission. Should a retiring

member refuse to assign a reason, the business acumen of most Lodge Secretaries would enable them to

supply this deficiency. Each year a table could be compiled, which would be exceedingly interesting, even if

not used to cope with this difficulty. I may at once say I have little sympathy with the large majority of

unattached Freemasons. Whatever the cause of their demission, they rarely resume active work, and seldom

last, even if resurrected. Impecuniosity is not a legitimate cause in this country, as special provision is made

to meet such cases. My feeling is entirely with the Craft, as the larger the number of the unattached army, the

greater the stigma on Freemasonry, which should be minimised by every means in our power. In my opinion,

"unsuitable admissions " are largely responsible, and in the present rush for places in Freemasonry all over

the world it is exceedingly difficult to sift the wheat from the chaff. In London to-day some Lodges have

what are called "waiting lists, and I think it would be as well if some Lodges in New Zealand adopted a

similar practice, if only to avoid the suspicion of admitting candidates with undue haste and in too large

numbers.

THE CONSTITUTION OF FREEMASONRY.

The next matter I submit is "The Constitution of Freemasonry." This is a subject about which there is a

diversity of opinion, and in these later days very much is said with reference to the democracy of

Freemasonry; which term, generally speaking, refers to government by the people; but in its application to

Freemasonry it is frequently held to refer to its Constitution, which should be of the people, which is not so

comprehensive a term as formerly ; indeed, it is not infrequently used now to define only one class. But

Freemasonry relies on an equality of class—at any rate, in the Lodge—which constitutes its so-called

democracy, which I think is a misapplied term, as, though the G.M. and representatives in those jurisdictions

that provide for them are elected by the Masonic vox populi, the fact that the G.M. wields a power that is

well nigh absolute is sufficient reason to dispel the idea that Freemasonry is, a democracy, at any rate, in the

sense in which the term is usually applied. But my present intention is to discuss what the constituent parts of

Freemasonry should consist of, and from whence its units should be drawn. Our Ritual asks the question,

"Who are fit and proper persons to be made Freemasons?" and itself furnishes the answer—" just, upright,

and free men of mature age, sound judgment, and strict morals." Now, a little reflection will evince that this

answer is not sufficiently comprehensive, as a person may possess all these qualifications and still be

ineligible for Freemasonry, as at least two others are almost as essential to secure good membership. Firstly,

his circumstances in life should be such as to enable him to bear a proportionate share in the maintenance of

the Craft without detriment to himself and his family ; and, secondly, he should be so constituted as to enable

him to fully understand, appreciate, and practice its somewhat peculiar tenets and precepts.

The first of these requirements raises the oft-discussed question as to whether Freemasonry should be

considered a luxury. This question was somewhat fully considered here some years ago, and a well-known

and cultured P.M. of this city contended that steps should be taken before admission to ascertain whether the

proposed candidate was financially able to support Freemasonry without robbing his family. Without

desiring to make Freemasonry a close corporation, the speaker strongly contended that it was a luxury, and

should be open only to those able to afford it, and there was a consensus of opinion in favour of this view.

Shortly after this pronouncement the G.L. of New Zealand revised its proposition form, which is now made

to include the following declaration : " That I am possessed of sufficient means to enable use to meet the

charges of my initiation and the support of my membership in the Craft without detriment to my family and

connections." The strict observance of this proviso is especially necessary at the present time, seeing the

great rush that appears to have set in for admission into Freemasonry, and in view of the strong possibility

that in the near future not only admission fees, but annual subscriptions will, in all probability, have to be

increased. Further, it should be made to operate as a buffer to the present-day tendency for widening the

doors of Freemasonry, at times so strongly advocated.

The other qualification to which I have referred—the faculty of appreciation—is of a more difficult

character, as it is not bounded by either intellect or education, in proof of which I have in my mind's eye a

leading statesman, a cultured gentleman, but an unattached Freemason, who on occasion somewhat

contemptuously contemns the teaching of Freemasonry, notwithstanding his indebtedness to it. So far as I

can see, there are only two ways in which the tendencies of a candidate can be ascertained : (a) by the

proposer having a most intimate knowledge of the idiosyncrasies of the friend he desires to propose, (b) as

suggested in the " N.Z. CRAFTSMAN " some months ago, the adoption of a system of interrogation and

instruction between election and initiation. There is just one other consideration in the disturbed state of

society to-day, which should be very clearly defined by the intending candidate—viz., an indisputable

avowal of loyalty. In this connection I want to be clearly understood that I am not advocating confining

Freemasonry to any particular class or classes. In contending for a candidate being in good circumstances, it

is entirely in the best interest of himself and his family, whom Freemasonry has no right to deprive of any

comforts or monetary support. The requirements as to an appreciative capacity is due to Freemasonry, which

has the right to demand the fulfilment of its share of the contract with all candidates. All these considerations

are, to my mind, essentially requisite if the constitution of Masonic membership is to be placed on a firm and

sure foundation.

LODGE VISITATIONS.

I will now briefly refer to Lodge visitations. This practice has grown very rapidly, and has become deeply

ingrained, though it is a product of little more than two decades. When it commenced to germinate, its one

purpose was presumed to be a fraternal compliment, and to promote good feeling and cement harmony

among the respective Lodges. But more latterly it has developed another object—viz., the reciprocal

exchange of ceremonial working. I propose to discuss in this paper three points: Firstly, has the practice any

other warrant than the sanction that rapidly increasing custom may give? Secondly, has it become inordinate

in operation? Thirdly, has the practice developed any prejudicial results? Some thirty or forty years ago

visiting by Lodges was virtually unknown, except on festival occasions. True, Lodges were fewer, which

should really have constituted an argument in favour of the adoption of such a custom at that time. At

ordinary meetings the dais was rarely occupied, except by the P.Ms. of the Lodge in session. But with the

advent at the G.L. of New Zealand new customs were inaugurated, induced possibly by the environment of

the times. Then the constitutional rule recommending visiting was adduced as an argument in favour, but this

rule has been misunderstood and misapplied. Like the similar English law, it only recommends visiting by

the W.M. and his Wardens. Thus the practice only has modern custom to recommend it. Dealing with the

second point, the practice has, I think, assumed inordinate dimensions, for which the W.M. is mainly

responsible—firstly, for the open invitation he invariably gives for as many members as possible to

accompany him ; secondly, for not strictly observing the letter of the law and bringing it more frequently

under the direct notice of members, unless for special reasons it may be desirable to hold it in abeyance.

With regard to the third point. I hold that the practice is prejudicial to the best interests of Freemasonry. In

venturing this contention I am aware that I am skating on thin ice, and I shall, no doubt, raise a storm of

opposition. At the present time members of Lodges see no incongruity in suddenly descending on another

Lodge in large numbers, often without notice ; indeed, twice during the present week I have seen it stated

that "this Lodge" has established a record in the large number of members who accompanied the W.M. in his

visit to Lodge —. In large towns there is rarely a night that the number of visitors does not almost equal, and

in some instances is greater than, the attendance of members, which is generally gratifying to the Master,

who attributes it either to his own popularity or to the excellence of the Lodge working. But who has not

heard an occasional plaint as to the desirableness of a Lodge being able to discuss its domestic affairs within

the privacy of its own circle? Let us take as an illustration our private life. We are all most pleased to

entertain our friends ; but if those friends were so importunate as to desire our entertainment every night, it

would, to say the least of it, soon become very monotonous. Thus with individuals, so with Lodges,

especially in the present times, when the question of cost cannot be despised. Only a short time since a

private meeting was held of the various Masters of the Wellington city Lodges, with the object of discussing

finance generally and the best means to be adopted to adjust a not too elastic income to an ever-increasing

expenditure. I at once asked my informant what steps were adopted to reduce the refreshments account, and

he sorrowfully rejoined, "not any of moment, though this item was the largest on many of the balance-

sheets." Surely W.Ms. should be willing to forego their instinctive desire to offer a generous hospitality, in

favour of adjusting the financial equilibrium of their respective Lodges, and a reduction of 50 per cent. of the

refreshments account alone should go a considerable way to achieve that object, besides giving their own

members a chance of being at home to themselves occasionally. If the constitutional laws were adhered to,

the hospitable intentions of a Lodge could not be disputed. If the desire for occasional large contingents still

prevailed, then a stipulated number of meetings could be announced when a Lodge would be "at home" to all

visitors, which should entirely fill the bill. Of course, the casual visitor coming from a distance is not

included in the foregoing category. . He is entitled to the full privilege of a visitor per se. Unlike the constant

resident visitor, he cannot claim, as many do, that his visits are so frequent that he should not be considered

as a visitor, which is not only true, but is more suggestive than many are probably aware of who make this

statement, and really constitutes a reason for some abstention.

With regard to reciprocal visitations for the exchange of ceremonial work, there would be no great objection,

provided the bounds of moderation were not exceeded, and this limitation should not, in my opinion, exceed

one in each year, with a further stipulation that the officers of one Lodge should not work an initiation in

another Lodge. While the G.L. of New Zealand allows passings and raisings to be done in other Lodges, it

very properly insists that a candidate must be initiated in the Lodge which has accepted him as a member,

and I am of the opinion that the embargo should go a little further, and that the Master and officers of such

Lodges should be entirely responsible for the initiatory ceremonial of the candidate they have accepted for

membership.

IDEALS.

I will now submit my last problem under the head of "Ideals," and will premise my remarks with the query,

Why is it that Freemasons are not Masonic? or, in other words, why will they not act up to their pledged

promises and professions and in accordance with the precepts of the Craft? Some of those promises are fully

comprehended in the O. of the T. Degree. While the precepts cover much that is embodied in the practical

and broad-minded charity which has been so prominently dealt with in the N.Z. CRAFTSMAN recently, and is

not to be confounded with that side of charity which is limited to pecuniary assistance, As one example, may

I ask how many brethren ever take the trouble to inquire if any of their fellows are in any way afflicted or

distressed in mind, body, or estate, or, when they acquire such knowledge, do they take any steps to afford

relief? Again, in sickness are they active in their visitation to the suffering brother and ready at all times to

offer the healing balm of consolation? Experience necessitates a negative reply. Still again, I ask why are we

Freemasons in theory and not in practice? In making these strictures I wish it to be clearly understood that I

refer to Freemasonry in the concrete, not to any particular section or to individuals. Thanks be to God I see

around me in this room to-night brethren who not only know Freemasonry, but who try to live it every hour

of their lives, who are constantly doing good by stealth, and would blush to find it fame. But the well-doing

of the few makes the laxity and the neglect of the many the more inexcusable, and what explanation can we

offer for this constant neglect of Masonic duty? If we are charitable, the fault may be charged to the head and

not to the heart. But I am inclined to the belief that the idea that has existed and been fostered for so long,

that the ideals of Freemasonry are visionary in character and incapable of realisation or attainment, is to no

little extent responsible for the general apathy that exists as to the duties of Freemasons.

Canon Garland, a very eloquent Anglican preacher, well-known in New Zealand in connection with the

question of Bible-in-schools, once preached a sermon when in Wellington, in which he dwelt on the question

of "Ideals," and in the course of his remarks said "that to human life ideals were a necessity ; that humanity

generally not only had ideals, but each section was striving to attain them. It did not follow that all ideals

were good and pure, as the variety was large. For example, the ideal of one man would be worldly ambition,

to another the power of wealth, to others again the ideality of life was bound up in amusement and frivolity.

Some lived only for the excitement of horse-racing and gambling, but in the strife and cares of human life all

were striving to reach the acme of their desires, which constituted their highest ideals." Freemasonry, too,

has its ideals, which are not quite clearly understood. Unfortunately, an idea has been propagated that the

ideal Freemasonry is unattainable, and this theory has found acceptance, and I hope I am not uncharitable in

saying that in some instances it has constituted an excuse for the relaxation of efforts to attain what is but too

frequently considered the unattainable. Thus, while we have the authority of an able theologian for the

statement that humanity en masse not only has ideals, but is falling over itself in its anxiety to attain them,

Freemasonry as a body tacitly claims exception from the general rule, and, while lauding the principles and

cardinal virtues of its teachings on the one hand, does not admit the possibility of bringing the illimitable

potentialities of the institution within the range of practicability on the other, because of its high ideality. Is

this not a very sorrowful admission? But what, after all, are these ideals of which we hear so much, and

despair in the attainment of them? What is an ideal? It is a visionary idea existing hi fancy or imagination, an

imaginary standard of perfection or beauty. Idealism is defined as that system of philosophy according to

which nothing exists but the mind itself and ideas conceived by the mind, or which maintains that we have

no rational grounds for believing the reality of anything but precipient minds and ideas. Is not, then, an ideal

bounded entirely by man's conception? For example, a learned and highly intellectual man would set up a

very much higher standard of perfection than his less cultivated brother. Yet each would fulfil his duty to

Freemasonry by living up to his own idealistic conception. I remember a brother, now no more, who

commanded not only the respect, but the love of his brethren. From his first admission he was a Freemason

in thought, word, and deed. Utterly unostentatious, with no fervid poetic imagination, he was a living

example of practicality. He loved Freemasonry, and took it into his everyday life. A devoted husband, a

loving father, and an adherent of religion. A lover of the ritual, he acquired it perfectly, and construed it

literally, not for the purposes of dramatic effect, but rather to impress his hearers with a proper conception of

its solemn truths, As a Secretary of long standing, his ideal was to give his best to the work, and when he had

passed from his earthly sphere to have his name recorded in the Book of Life. Our brother had early formed

his ideals in Freemasonry, and had without apparent effort lived up to each of them. And yet, with the force

of this and kindred examples, the opinion is reiterated that the standard of perfection in Freemasonry is too

high for ordinary mortals to attain. Perish such a thought, and let each brother discard the high perfection

standard in favour of one that may be well within the compass of his attainments. Set it low at first, if you

like, and raise it as time and perseverance enable you to overcome difficulties. If, as Canon Garland says,

human life demands ideals and is striving for their attainment, be they good or bad, surely Freemasonry, with

its grand symbolism, its moral teaching, its cardinal virtues, and its philanthropic work, is not going to allow

itself to be shouldered out of the race, or despair of accomplishing its proper destiny, simply because the

conception of its members is at fault, and they have never properly estimated their capabilities for good.

Brethren, the exigency of time has only enabled me to discuss these several questions with the utmost

brevity, which may detract from my arguments, and has restrained me from adducing others. I do not ask you

to accept my opinions or deductions, but I do claim that each of the questions submitted is important, and in

the interest of Freemasonry should receive consideration. The question is frequently asked why an

organisation presumably so powerful as Freemasonry is deemed to be by the world at large does not exercise

greater influence in mundane matters, if only by the force of example. And I think its failure is here : As a

collective body I do not see that Freemasonry can make its presence felt except through its philanthropy. The

virtue of the ethical teaching must be evinced through the individual. If he fails to impress his fellow men,

then the failure is reflected on the institution. In the present age numbers do not impress the world unless

supported by indisputable strength. If Masonic power is vested in the individual, then the greatest judgment

is necessary in the selection of those units who are to constitute the army. Not-withstanding all that may be

said to the contrary, I do not think that this care in selection is quite universal in any country, and failure in

only one Lodge exercises a pernicious influence on the Craft of Freemasonry generally.

In conclusion, and in support of my theories, I am impelled to quote from an independent authority—a

P.G.M. who is eminently fitted by education and experience to discuss questions of such import to the Craft.

He says :—

“True success can only be measured by the extent to which the community- generally is being benefited by

the manner in which we, as individual Masons, are exemplifying in our daily lives the principles inculcated

by our institution. Taking this as a criterion, can we truthfully say that success has in the past crowned our

work? I am afraid not. Every Masonic Lodge should by the very character of its members exercise a

powerful influence for good amongst the community in which it exists, and our principles should, by the

conduct of its members, be found permeating the civic and domestic life of the people. Do we not, however,

find that coldness and apathy take the place of an active exemplification of Masonic truths and principles?

This conduct on our part nullifies the aims and weakens the force of our institution. The fault lies on our

shoulders, as the majority of us are neglecting to put into practice, as individuals in our daily avocations, the

principles inculcated in the Lodge-room. There never was a time that called for more rigid self-examination.

Let each individual brother put to himself the question as to what he has done, by force of example or

otherwise, for the advancement and betterment of humanity, and he will be surprised at the answer he must

give to the question he propounds. It is my earnest desire that Masonry should` be an active living force for

good in the world at large. If we would only exemplify by our daily actions all the duties and requirements of

the Craft, what a difference we would make in our particular environment and sphere of influence! Our

conduct would be appreciably felt, and would be the means of attracting to our banners the best of the

community. Rest assured, brethren, if you are to get the best out of Freemasonry you must give of your best,

in its cause. This determination to give thus of our best should naturally commence from the time of our

initiation, when we form our first impressions of the benefits of the institution."

OBITUARY.

———<>———

V.W. BRO. GEORGE ALLPORT, P.D.D.G.M., E.C.

———

It is with more than ordinary regret that we chronicle the death of the above well-known

brother, who was summoned to the G.L. above without one moment's warning. It may justly be

claimed that Bro. Allport was a lover of the whole Craft, and the life he lived was an example to

every member of the institution of Freemasonry. A capable Government officer of upwards of

forty years' standing, of the utmost integrity, and highly esteemed. A worthy citizen of

unimpeached reputation. Faithful to Freemasonry, even unto death. Bro. Allport was admitted

into Lodge Wellington, E.C., in the year 1889, and filled all the offices in the Lodge but I.G.

and J.D., reaching the Master's chair in 1903. In Dist.G.L. he held several appointments, and

became Dep.Dist.G.M. in 1915, which office he retained until 1918, and in December, 1919,

Wellington Lodge presented him with the regalia of his P.Dist G. rank. At the time of his death

Bro. Allport held the office of 1st Gen. in the Wellington Rose Croix Chapter, under the

Supreme Council of England and Wales, and would in all probability have been elected to the

chair of M.W.S. in July next. He was also a P.M. of the Installed Masters' Lodge of Wellington

City, and was a most regular attendant, though residing at the Lower Hutt. If a man's life is a

criterion of the man, then it may with confidence be said that the late Bro. Geo. Allport has

succeeded to a more enduring inheritance.

——————

W. BRO. GEORGE JOHN WINTER, P.A.G.S.B.

———

W. Bro. Winter, whose health had been failing for a very considerable time, died on Tuesday,

9th March. He was a very prominent figure in Freemasonry some years ago, but owing to ill-

health and increasing deafness had been unable of late to take an active part in our meetings and

ceremonies. He was the oldest member on the roll or Lodge Abercorn, No. 76, having been

initiated in June, 1887, installed as W.M. in 1891, and made a life member in 1914. Ho was a

Maori War veteran, and held the rank of lieutenant-colonel at his death. His military training

and knowledge and love of Freemasonry made him invaluable as a Master and subsequent D. of

C., the duties of whatever office he filled being carried out with conspicuous ability. His whole

nature abhorred careless or slip-shod work, and the influence of his good example is still in

evidence in the Lodge. His funeral was attended by many members of the three Gisborne

Lodges, the Masonic portion of the service, as well as that of the Anglican Church, being

conducted by W. Bro. Rev. H. Packe.

——————

W. BRO. C. M. IGGLESDEN, P.D.G.Sec., E.C.

———

The doyen of New Zealand Pacific, No. 2, has passed hence, at the good old age of 88 years.

Bro. Igglesden was initiated in the Lodge of Unanimity, E.C., Lyttelton, on 22nd January, 1863.

He joined the N.Z. Pacific Lodge, then under the E.C., on the 22nd April, 1869, and on leaving

Wellington for Nelson, was elected an honorary member on the 27th October, 1890. On his

return from Nelson he resumed activity with his Lodge, until the infirmity of age precluded his

going out at night. In 1876 Bro. Igglesden was Dist.G.Sec. for the North Island of New Zealand,

under Sir Donald McLean, Dist.G.M., and after the constitution of the Dist.G.L. of Auckland,

E.C., he became Dist.G.Sec. for the Wellington District, subsequently relinquishing that office

in favour of the late Bro. Butts. In 1879 he became Dist.G.Reg., and in 1882 Dist.G.D. of C. In

1876 he was exalted in the Union R.A. Chapter, E.G., Wellington, and in 1886 joined the

Trafalgar Chapter, S.C., Nelson. In 1877 he was perfected in the Cleopatra Rose Croix Chapter,

S.C. This record evinces the keen interest he took in Freemasonry, which he maintained

until the close of his earthly career. The funeral took place on Monday, 19th April, at the Bolton

Street Cemetery, Wellington, the Masonic service being recited by W. Bros. H. B. Bridge and

H. H. Seaton, P.Ms. of the Lodge, in the presence of a number of the brethren. Many were

unable to attend owing to the violent and atrocious weather.

CONSTITUTION AND CONSECRATION OF LODGE OROUA, No. 215.

———<>———

Lodge Oroua was duly brought into existence on 7th April, being constituted and consecrated in the

Oddfellows' Hall, Apiti. The brethren assembled at 3.30 p.m., when the G.D. of C, V.W. Bro. G. Russell,

called them to order to receive the constituting officers, who entered in procession and at once assumed the

chairs, M.W: Bro. A. L. Herdman presiding. M.W. Bro. M. Niccol, G.Sec. ; R.W. Bro. J. H. Keesing,

P.D.G.M. ; R.W. Bro. D. McFarlane, Prov.G..M. ; V.W. Bro. Rev. J. H. Sykes, G.Chap. ; W. Bro. H. J. F.

Jaggard, G.S.D. ; W. Bro. O. Neilson, P.G.S.D. ; W. Bro, W. H. Maclean, G. S., were present.

A Lodge having been opened in the First Degree by R.W. Bro. Keesing, P.D.G.M. the G.Sec. having

affirmed that the proceedings were in order, the petitioning brethren were arranged in the body of the Lodge,

while the G.Sec. read the petition and Charter, and the petitioners assented to those named to preside over

them. The consecrating officer was R.W. Bro. Keesing, P.D.G.M., who very ably performed the ceremony.

The M.W.G.M. then constituted the Lodge, and the G.D. of C. made the proclamation, and V.W. Bro. Rev.

Sykes, G.Chap., delivered an earnest and effective address. R.W. Bro. Keesing, P.D.G.M., handed the

control of the new Lodge to R.W. Bro. D. McFarlane, Pro .G.M., who immediately proceeded with the

ceremony of installation up to the board of I.M., when W. Bro. Wm. McKay, P.M., was again placed in the

chair of K.S. Adjournment was then made for tea, the Lodge resuming at 7.30, when the ceremony was

proceeded with. The address to the W.M. was given by M.W. Bro. M. Niccol, G.Sec.; to the Wardens by

V.W. Bro. George Russell, G.D. of C. ; and to the brethren by R.W. Bro. J. H. Keesmg, P.D.G.M., after

which the Lodge was closed. The brethren then all retired to the hall, when a good supper was enjoyed and

some excellent speeches were given, the M.W.G.M. and the G.Sec. being in real good form. The proceedings

were most enjoyable, and thanks are due to R.W. Bro. D. McFarlane, Prov.G.M. of the Ruapehu District.—

[Communicated.]

———————————————————————————————————————————

Correspondence.
———————————————————————————————————————————

CIVIL TITLES IN FREEMASONRY.

———<>———

TO THE EDITOR.

DEAR SIR AND BRO.,— In your March and -April issue letters have appeared over the signature of Wm.

Jacobsen, P.M. In both letters Bro. Jacobsen pointed out very clearly that in Masonry no civil titles are, or

rather, should be used. I had expected a number of letters supporting Bro. Jacobsen, but none having

appeared so far, I venture, as an old Mason, to express my most hearty approval of his views. It is a very

important question, and no matter of so-called courtesy should be allowed to contravene Masonic teaching. If

civil titles are to be used in Lodge, then we place rank and fortune on an equality with honour and virtue, and

this is not what Masonry teaches.— Yours fraternally, HERBERT F. INNES JONES, Chaplain.

—————————

SOME OBSERVATIONS.

———<>———

TO THE EDITOR.

DEAR SIR AND BRO.,—I notice that a Southland brother has called attention to what he considers an anomaly

in the Lecture on the 2nd T.B. May I be excused for pointing out that the phrase as used in the ritual is quite

right, as will be clear if the meaning is studied ? It first declares that the P.A. is a stone of true die—that is to

say, it has been ascertained to be perfect. Therefore it is suitable for the craftsman to "try" his jewel or tool

on, and then adjust his jewel if it is not true. A practised speaker who tries to convey the exact meaning will

make a slight pause after the word "try," almost as though a comma had been placed after it, though in

correct punctuation a comma should never precede the conjunction "and." While on this subject I note that in

the late Bro. Haweridge's lecture the word " indite" is used as well as "write." Its use after the word "write"

in our ritual is tautological, and is merely repeating with a word coming through the Old French the word

from the Anglo-Saxon just previously used. It is just as if one said "upright, erect. " It should be omitted

from our ritual. There are a number of similar defects in our ritual, and if you will permit me I would like to

supply a series of articles dealing with obvious errors in our rituals from the E.A. to the final side degrees in

the R. A. I do not wish to be dogmatic in my observations on the ritual, but possibly discussion would be

productive of benefit. I quite agree with your article on "Ritualistic Exactness," but while exactness is

eminently desirable, it should be exactness in correctness. There is a ritual in common use that refers to our

institution as "a perfect monument of Wonder, Strength, and Beauty," the word Wonder "being an obvious

misprint for "Wisdom," and you may often hear this error perpetuated at installations. Then, again, in the

Third Degree a north entrance has been introduced, but we have no officer in the north, which, moreover, as

explained at some length by Macky in his Lexicon, is, Masonically, a place of darkness. —Yours

fraternally, PENTALPHA.

—————————

INSTALLATION WORKING TOOLS.

———

M.M. :—When you were raised, the Tools of a M.M. were presented to .you. On your installation in the

Chair of K.S. they serve to remind you that in the discharge of your duties as W.M. you should be careful to

walk in the straight and undeviating line of duty, ever remembering that your actions are recorded by

T.G.A.O.T.U., whose unerring justice will reward or punish us according to our merits.

F.C. :—On your being passed, the Tools of a F.C. were presented to you. They teach the lessons of morality,

equality, and uprightness of conduct, in regard to which you are, as a ruler in the Craft, expected to be an

example to your fellows.

E.A. :—At your initiation the W.Ts. of an E.A. were presented to you to equip you for the first portion of

your Masonic career, and specially remind you to devote your time to its proper objects, to rid your life of

vices and superfluities, and to polish your ideas. You have now been handed all the W.Ts. used in our

ceremonies to enable you to have their operative uses and moral significance explained to your candidates,

either by yourself or by some competent P.M. Take special care that they are used with effect in preparing

the living stones of your Lodge for the Celestial Temple above.

[The foregoing explanation of the W.Ts. has been sent by our esteemed correspondent as an example of

conciseness, besides being very much to the point.—ED. C.]

—————————

GRACE BEFORE MEAT.

———<>———

TO THE EDITOR.

DEAR SIR AND BRO.,—It is a pleasant and seemly custom, when the brethren assemble in the refectory after

labour, for them to stand around the tables while Bro. Chaplain says grace. It seems a pity that no Masonic

grace is on these occasions ever heard, but invariably simply one of the current forms used by Christian

sects. Not only are these not distinctively Masonic in character, but their use detracts from the present-day

universality of the Order, like the splashes of Protestant theology one sometimes hears in the addresses of

eminent brethren, and the selections from Anglican hymnology that creep into the ritual. If any of your

learned and travelled readers knows of a Masonic grace, he would be deserving well of the brethren to let it

appear in your columns. Meanwhile, I append a couple of suggestions :—

"T.G.A.O.T.U, by whose ordinance were provided the corn, the wine, and the oil for our ancient brethren,

and for us this food : may we take the same with thankfulness, and sit together in true fellowship, now, and

hereafter..—S.M.I.B."

Or, more shortly

"Brethren all! Let us sit at meat in thankfulness, and rise in true fellowship.—S.M.I.B."—Yours fraternally,

STUDENT.

—————————

A TIME-HONOURED TOAST.

———<>———

TO THE EDITOR.

DEAR SIR AND BRO.,—I have read with interest, and with some concern, the article reprinted in your April

issue upon the toast of "The King and the Craft." It is a little matter, perhaps, but it indicates important

tendencies. Nothing more surprised me, on my first entrance into Freemasonry, than to hear this toast. I knew

that Freemasonry was non-political, that it was so greatly on the side of light and progress that it had been

altogether expelled from Russia, lived under a ban in countries such as Belgium, and had been flattered with

the attention of a special encyclical letter from the head of the principal division of the Christian Church. I

had just been instructed to refrain from all topics of political and religious discussion. And yet, ten minutes

afterwards, I was invited to drink this toast, and to join in the English National Anthem. Further knowledge

and reflection taught me that there was an historical explanation, if not a good present-day reason, for the

observance; that as there are many things dating from the time when the Order was purely Christian, and

some from the time when the Order was exclusively Catholic, so this was to be ascribed to the times when

Freemasons may be estimated to have been entirely of a monarchical way of thinking. But I doubt very

greatly whether in this century, and in these days, its continuance is advisable. A man is no worse a

Freemason (I believe) because he believes that the monarchical form of government is less desirable than the

republican; and furthermore he may, I apprehend, be justly entitled to propagate his opinion, provided

always that he use no unlawful means. But if he were to call on all the brethren to drink to the fulfilment of

his aspirations, and to join in singing one of William Morris's republican hymns, or a strophe from

Swinburne, none would be so affected as those who now chorus "God Save the King" in his face.

There are brethren who justify the practice by referring to the Charge wherein we are enjoined never to lose

sight of the allegiance due to the sovereign of our native land. But it is trite constitutional law that

"sovereign" and "subject" relate respectively to the institutions or persons who set the laws, and to those who

obey them, in a normal state at a normal time. The sovereign in England is the Crown in Parliament, not his

present majesty, who, like other men, is subject to the lab'. And, like any other precept, this Charge must be

interpreted reasonably, and assumes the continued worthiness of the sovereign to receive allegiance. Can it

be suggested that those Australians who in the nineties of last century, worked successfully to transfer a great

part of the sovereignty from their states to the Commonwealth, were acting unmasonically? Will any aver

that Garibaldi, for all the sovereign powers he overturned, was not an ornament to the Craft? Is it ever denied

that George Washington, who was a moving spirit in overthrowing the sovereign monarchical government in

America, was both a great and good Freemason?

The article I have mentioned reports the Prov.G.M. of the English Constitution as saying :—" We cannot, in

conformity with our pledges, associate ourselves with any men, whether they be Freemasons or otherwise, or

whether they be men of our own country or in foreign countries, who are concerned in plots or conspiracies,

or are undermining the monarchy under which they live. That is the significance of the toast. It is a pledge to

which we might be called upon to prove our sincere attachment." In other words, our noble brother

recognizes that republicanism may become a practical issue in English politics, and seeks to make

Freemasonry a political instrument on the monarchical side: This is not the only instance in your April issue

of an endeavour to nobble Freemasonry in the interests of the monarchy and the House of. Lords. We know

that a similar effort has been so successful in Sweden that the highest degree in the Craft there is obtainable

only by members of the Royal Family. One cannot think that thus to bask in the favour of the court is in the

best interests of Swedish Freemasonry. There is no reason for Freemasonry to dread republicanism! The

Reviews- of Foreign Correspondence published by G.L. for many years show conclusively that just as

Freemasonry flourishes better whey government is secular than where it tends to be clerical, so, and in very

marked degree, its progress is greatest under republican forms of government.

Happily, the question is for us at present purely an academic one. We know, however, that some of the

wisest thinkers in England have been, and are, in favour of some non-monarchical sovereignty ; that there is

a certain body of opinion now articulate there and opposed to the monarchy ; and that an issue of this nature

in British politics must inevitably to some extent be echoed in New Zealand. Should that day come, it will be

a bad thing for the Craft, and a grievous wrong to many of our brethren, if Freemasonry in the Dominion

shall have so far committed itself on the one side or the other that brethren holding diverse political views

can no longer sit together in the Lodges in peace and amity. It would be far better to use a little foresight and

Masonic kindliness, and check at once the tendencies I have noted, than to wait till minds are inflamed with

the heat of party strife and blinded and confused by hard words and cross issues. One can imagine what

would happen —what could hardly help happening : suggestions, discussion, expostulation, mild and

brotherly at first, but rapidly tinged with acrimony ; scenes in the refectory, resignation of members, possibly

suspension or expulsion, the founding of new Lodges, and a new governing body ; reciprocal appeals to all

the world, by the one side for recognition, by the other for condemnation and ostracism ; in a word, all the

uncharitableness that attended the formation of G.L. thirty years ago ten times intensified : and a set-back of

half a century in Masonic work and progress.

Sir, I personally take no side, and express no political opinion. I have endeavoured temperately to stem, with

only such emphasis as may bring home the reality of the issue, that there are two sides to this question, as to

every other; and to submit that where there is even a possibility, however remote, that a matter may become

an issue of practical party politics, that issue should be kept outside the portals of Freemasonry.

—Yours fraternally. C.

[To avoid any suspicion of plagiarism it may be mentioned that the article on "The Victorian Labour Party

and Freemasonry " in our editorial columns was written before the foregoing letter was received.—E.C.]

—————————

FIREMEN ENTERTAINED BY LODGE HERETAUNGA.

———<>———

During the Fire Brigades Conference held in Hastings a short time since, some thirty firemen were

entertained by Lodge Heretaunga, and the W.M. (Bro. R. W. Jones) made some very pertinent remarks in

responding to the toast of the Lodge. He, said

"BRETHREN OF THE FIRE BRIGADES On behalf of this Lodge, permit me to thank you for the fraternal

sentiments expressed by the mover and all of you for your ,very generous response to the toast of

Heretaunga.

"I can assure you we do not claim to be doing anything of a special nature—not at all. We are but fulfilling a

duty which devolves upon Freemasons all over the world. We are but extending to you the right hand of

fellowship, the sentiments of brotherhood and fraternal goodwill, which should ever be on change between

the members of our ancient and world-wide institution.

"As soon as it became known that a number of the delegates to this Fire Brigade Conference belonged to the

Craft, the members of Heretaunga were of one mind that we must invite you to join us in a social evening.

The unanimity to which I have referred was (I may as well admit) not altogether devoid of the element of

self. We felt we could not allow this opportunity to pass of meeting in social intercourse so many

representative brethren from so many parts of this Dominion, having in mind the profit and pleasure in store

for us all.

"We can only regret that the time at your disposal will not permit of another opportunity of our meeting

together during this conference. If such were possible we might find time to consider how best the ideals and

principles of Freemasonry stands for could be utilised with a view to the social, industrial, and economic

reconstruction of our country and Empire, on lines similar to those discussed in the February issue of the

N.Z. CRAFTSMAN in a leading article entitled What will the future be?'

"As bearing upon the sobering and beneficial influences that the general dissemination of Masonic teachings

and ideals might have, it might be mentioned as a significant fact that the Masonic press in every English-

speaking country is, almost without exception, proclaiming, Who better to assist in the work of

reconstruction and the moulding of public opinion than those who have been educated in the sublime

principles of Freemasonry?'

"This, brethren, is the question which our deepest thinkers are earnestly inviting us to solve, and I commend

it to the serious consideration of every one of my brethren here present. Probably, at first sight, there are

some present who may argue that this is treading dangerously near the domain of politics ; but the thinkers to

whom I have referred are evidently not of that opinion. Of course, it is not suggested that we should publish

our secrets and virtues from the housetops, neither does it imply anything in the nature of political action,

which is precluded in our order. But it is suggested, and even urged, that Masons should, as citizens, put into

practice (out in the open) those high ideals and principles taught in our Lodgeroom, much more generally

than has hitherto been done, instead of rolling them up with our aprons and allowing them to lie dormant

during the intervals between our monthly meetings.

"Brethren, I have no hesitation in expressing the opinion that if we could but do this good work to the extent

we ought to be doing it, then Freemasonry would become such a potent force for the general good of

humanity, that the thresholds of every Masonic temple in the land would become thronged with the best

types of manhood in the community, seeking admittance-to its mysteries and privileges. And in this way the

ancient and honourable institution of Freemasonry could become a dominant factor in counteracting the

forces of revolutionary tendencies which are to-day threatening the peace, order, and industrial progress of

almost every land.

"In this connection, let me repeat that every Freemason is enjoined to be exemplary in the discharge of his

civil duties; I by never proposing or in any way countenancing any act that may have a tendency to subvert

the peace and good order of society ; by paying due obedience to the laws of any State which may for a time

become the place of residence or afford him its protection; and, above all, by never losing sight of the

allegiance due to the sovereign of his land.

"We have only to keep in mind this very excellent injunction to realise what our duty is as citizens of the

world in general, and of our own beloved Empire in particular.

"Brethren, I have digresesd somewhat from .the purpose which brought me upstanding, but I doubt not you

all fully appreciate the important bearing the subject I have introduced has upon the future peace, order, and

good government of our country. The importance I attach to it myself is my only excuse for introducing it -

on this occasion.

"Those of you who think most deeply on these problems will, no doubt, be forming in the back of your

minds the idea that your humble servant and brother is of opinion that Fremasonry is not fulfilling its true

destiny on this plain issue. If that is so, your hammers are getting pretty close to the head of the nail.

Brethren, in conclusion I once again thank you on behalf of Heretaunga."

—————————

CO-MASONRY—CAUTION TO THE CRAFT.

———<>———

The following is an extract from the report of the B. of G.P. of the United. G.L. of England, issued on 3rd

September, 1919 :—

"The Board's attention is being increasingly drawn to sedulous endeavours which are being made by certain

bodies, unrecognised as Masonic by the United G.L. of England, to induce Freemasons to join in their

assemblies. As all such bodies which admit women to membership are clandestine and irregular, it is

necessary to caution brethren against being inadvertently led to violate their obligations by becoming

members of them or attending their meetings. G.L., nine years since, approved the action of the Board in

suspending from all Masonic rights and privileges two brethren who had contumaciously failed to explain

the grave Masonic irregularity to which attention is now again called, and it is earnestly hoped that no

occasion will arrive for having again to institute disciplinary proceedings of a like kind. "

[We direct the attention of Freemasons in New Zealand to the above extract.—E.C.]

—————————

CONSECRATION OF OMARANUI LODGE AT TARADALE, H.B.

———<>———

The efforts of the brethren at Taradale, who for some time past have been labouring to-found a Masonic

Lodge, found consummation on the 14th April, when the above-named Lodge was solemnly consecrated.

The ceremony was held in the Church of England Schoolroom, which gave ample accommodation for the

130 brethren who assisted at the ceremony. At 5 p.m. the G.D. of C. (V.W. Bro. George Russell) called the

brethren to order to receive the Consecrating Officer (M.W. Bro. Herbert J. Williams) and the following

acting G. officers :— R.W. Bro. B. G. Chadwick, Prov.G.M.; W. Bro. J. H. Morrison as S.G.W. ; W. Bro. C.

H. Critchley as J.G.W. ; W. Bro. W. G. Jarvis as G.Sec. ; Bro. Rev. J. H. Sykes, G. Chap.; W. Bro. L.

Freedman as J.G.D. ; W. Bro. J. B. E. Herd us J.G.D. ; W. Bro. L. T. Cooper as G.Purs.

The G. officers having assumed their respective chairs, the M.W.C.O. opened a Lodge in the First Degree,

and having explained the purpose of the meeting, read the Dispensation from the M.W.G.M. empowering

M.W. Bro. Williams to act as deputy pro tem. The Lodge having been opened in the Second and Third

Degrees, the ceremony was proceeded with. The petition and Charter having been read, the petitioners

signified their approval of the officers named therein to preside over them. A procession was formed, the

following brethren bearing the elements :—Corn, R.W. Bro. Chadwick ; Wine,. W. Bro. Thomas ; Oil, W.

Bro. J. W. Ritchie; Salt, W. Bro. Redshaw, The elements were respectively presented to the consecrating

officer after each circuit, and were distributed by him. Subsequently he pronounced the Invocation, and then

dedicated the Lodge. The G.Chap. in three perambulations censed the Lodge. After the dedication prayer the

G.Chap. delivered an excellent address, which was greatly appreciated. The Consecrating Officer formally

constituted Omaranui Lodge, and the brethren did homage to the G.L. of New Zealand. The G.D. of C. made

proclamation, and the Patriarchal Benediction was pronounced. The control was handed to R.W. Bro.

Chadwick, who proceeded with the ceremony of installing W. Bro. Dr. P. C. B. Swanseger as W.M., with the

usual ceremonies. The Lodge was called off at 6.30 p.m., resuming one hour later, W. Bro. Thomas acting as

D. of C. The usual proclamations were made and W. Ts. were presented by W. Bros. A. J. Turyille, H. Bate,

and R.W. Bro. Jones. M.W. Bro. H. J.Williams presented the Charter with a few remarks appropriate to the

occasion, also the B. of C. W. Bro. D. Wilson delivered the address to the W.M., who invested E. J. Bull as

I.P.M., and the S.W. (W. Bro. J. A. Miller). The J. W. was absent. W. Bro. J. W. Ritchie then charged the

S.W. on his duties. Bro. W. H. Whitton invested the following officers :—Chaplain, W. Bro. A. J. Turyille ;

Treas., W. Bro. J. Redshaw; Sec., W. Bro. W. G. Jarvis; D. of C., W. Bro. H. W. Whitton ; S.D., Bro. A. A.

Hastings ; J.D., Bro. T. F. Maidens; Organist, Bro. J. Rockell; I.G., Bro. J. M. Linklater ; Stewards, Bros. J.

Etheridge and C. W. Forrest ; Tyler, Bro. F. W. Wiseman. The address to the brethren was given by R.W.

Bro. H. L. Harston, P.P.G.M. The offertory for the Annuity Fund realised £7 2s. 6d. Congratulations having

been received, the Lodge was closed at 9 p.m. Refreshments were subsequently served in the Town Hall.

—————————

A UNIQUE PRESENTATION.

———<>———

A unique presentation of W.Ts. was made to Lodge Albion, No. 45, Devonport, Auckland, at its recent

regular meeting in the presence of a large gathering of members and visitors. Bro. Major H. W. Smith, who

commanded the Anzac Divisional Transport in Gallipoli, Egypt, and Palestine for five years, while in

Jerusalem caused a set of W.Ts. to be made and forwarded them to New Zealand. These were, it is assumed,

lost in a torpedoed boat, but he again had a beautiful set made and presented them personally to Lodge

Albion. The W.M., W. Bro. Claude L. Jewell (editor of the "New Zealand Observer") explained that one of

the gavels had been made from olive wood cut on the Mount of Olives, another being from the traditional

site of the Garden of Gethsemane. A pair of compasses, exquisitely finished, were made from olive wood

gathered in the vicinity of the Mosque of Omar—the traditional site of the Temple. A further gavel was of

pure white stone from King Solomon's: quarries, the whole being in a beautiful olive-wood box, on which is

a silver plate engraved suitably. The W.M., in thanking Bro. Major Smith, said he believed no other Lodge in

New Zealand possessed a set of W.Ts. of so unique an interest. They not only came from the birthplace of

Freemasonry, but during a period when the Holy Land was freed from a sinister domination that had

obtained for centuries. He believed such notable gifts were thought-inspiring and in the finest interests, of the

Craft.

—————————

THE WELLINGTON BOARDS FAREWELL THE GRAND SECRETARY.

———<>———

On the 23rd ult., the B. of G.P. and the B. of B., which also includes the Annuity Board, met in the Masonic

Hall, Wellington, for the purpose of saying au revoir to M.W. Bro. M. Niccol, G.Sec., on his leaving for his

new location, Dunedin. All the members were present. After discussing sundry comestibles, the chairman,

V.W. Bro. J. J. Esson, called for the toast of the King, which was duly honoured. He then proposed the toast

of the M.W.G.Sec. In doing so he referred to the valuable work performed by Bro. Niccol, the general

esteem in which he was held, and the harmonious nature of the proceedings of the Boards during the

Wellington administration. He noted the fact that when Bro. Niccol took office the accumulated funds were

approximately £4,000, but to-day nearly that amount accrued in annual interest. Bro. Esson then, on behalf of

the Boards, asked Bro. Niccol's acceptance of a suit case and case of fish knives and forks. He then called

upon R.W. Bro. Seaton, chairman of the B. of B., and V.W. Bro. J. G. Harkness to supplement his remarks.

Both these brethren accepted the invitation, and paid glowing panegyrics to the work and service rendered by

M.W. Bro. Niccol. The Wellington Quartette then gave an exquisite rendering of "Sweet and Low." M.W.

Bro. Niccol, on rising to reply, was greeted with great applause. In the course of his reply, he became

interestingly reminiscent on the governing bodies of G.L. out of session since he had occupied the secretarial

chair. He made some pertinent remarks on the non-continuity of the Boards [referred to in our leading

columns, which were written prior to this meeting], and the very great responsibility the system cast on the

G.Sec., which he thought was not quite proper. He also remarked that he had never previously felt the

disability of the peripatetic system so much as on the present occasion, especially from the fact that he was

removing to a colder and damper climate. During his sojourn in Wellington he had had a very happy time,

and the local brethren had made a most admirable selection of the members of both Boards, who were

brethren of experience. He especially thanked the Boards for their kind gifts, one of which would be

especially appreciated by Mrs. Niccol, while the other would accompany him in many future visits to

Wellington. The brother was loudly applauded on resuming his seat. The quartette party gave two more

items to the admiration of those present, and Bro. Thompson gave an excellent rendering of two vocal

numbers. After a period of social intercourse, the chairman called upon the brethren for "Auld Lang Syne,"

which was very heartily given, and concluded a very enjoyable function.

—————————

SUBSCRIPTIONS ACKNOWLEDGED.

———<>———

W. B. Allan 27/6 (Sydney), J. Critchfield 20/-, Rev. Sykes, W. Spear (Wellington), H. A. Morris (Petone),

W. H. Brown 8/4 (Hunterville), J. Young (Oamaru), B. W. CIandell (Rarotonga), Chas. Moore 35/- (Napier),

A. T. Hookey 11/8, E. Knight 21/- (Gisborne), J. W. Abson (Denniston), F. Rogers (Helensville), L.

Meeking 17/6 (Cambridge), J. K. Trim (Lower Hutt), W. L. Roberts (Dannevirke), F. W. Mumm (Paeroa), J.

W. McKenna 30/- (Collingwood), C. E. Derrett (Waiau), J. H. Slane 9/2 (Auckland), W. McDougall

(Otoko), W. McP. Mutton 10/- (Picton), H. W. G. Ashworth 29/2 (Palmerston North), J. French 20/- (Mata

Mata), E. A Bowman, R. F. Henderson (Oxford).

(All 7/6 except. those noted.)

———————————————————————————————————————————

Reports.
———————————————————————————————————————————

[Secretaries and Scribes are requested to forward Reports.]

————

CRAFT LODGES.

————

SOUTHLAND.

Southern Cross, No. 9.—The Third Degree was worked at the regular meeting on the 31st March. There

was a good attendance. W. Bro. L. L. Padget, W.M., was assisted by R.W. Bro., F. A. Steans, W. Bro. W. A.

Stout, and Bros. H. J. Farrant, F. R. Padget, and W. H. Robinson. Two F.Cs. were raised. A social hour

followed, minus harmony.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

St. John, No. 94.—A very large attendance was present at the regular meeting on the 19th March. Three

candidates were initiated. The W.M. was assisted by his Wardens, W. Bro. C. H. Poole, and Bros. A.

McLean, W. Jackson, and A. Wilson. Full justice was done to a toast list at the after meeting. There being no

harmony, ample time remained for many excellent speeches.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Taringatura, No. 100.—There was a fair attendance at the regular meeting on the 29th March, when the

principal work was the initiation of one candidate. The W.M. (Bro. G. Finlay) conducted the ceremony, and

was ably assisted by W. Bros. H. Beer, D. Walker, S. E. Griffiths, Todd, and Bro. H. Ewen. Since his

installation W. Bro. Finlay has had a busy time, and there is every indication that his term 'of office will

continue to be busy; but with his unbounded enthusiasm, plus the assistance of a large number of capable

P.Ms., and an efficient band of office-bearers, our W.M. should have a most successful year.—[Lodge

Correspondent.]

————

Victoria, No. 147.—There was a very large attendance at the regular meeting on the 9th April, when two

F.Cs. were raised. The W.M. was assisted by his officers and W. Bros. J. Petrie, C. J. Yule, N. J.

Brokenshire, A. Geddes, A. Wilson, the ceremonial work being markedly efficient. A pleasant after meeting

followed.

An emergency meeting was held on the 12th April, when two other Res. were raised, the work being again

efficiently conducted by W. Bro. Greig, officers, and -P.Ms.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Tuatapere, No. 210.—The ordinary meeting took place on the 7th April, W. Bro. A. F. Kemp in the Chair of

K.S., when there was a good attendance. The work was the passing of two brethren. The W.M. was assisted

by Bros. W. Young, Hinchcliff, Charlton, Rillstone, and Nicholas. This Lodge has now purchased a very

suitable sight for their Lodgeroom, and by the enthusiasm displayed the Lodge should soon possess a home

of its own. The W. M. and W. Bro. Robinson, of Lodge St. John, No. 94, together made and presented to the

Lodge two magnificent swords (Crusader design) over 40 inches in length. They are quite an acquisition, and

the gift was very much appreciated. In order to facilitate the filling in of the usual proposition forms to Board

of Inquiry, the W.M. asked all brethren proposing candidates to fill these papers in on night of proposition,

so it would be necessary that full information be obtained prior to this meeting of all particulars such as

places of previous residence, reason for joining the Craft, etc. H.G.W were received from Lodges Orepuki,

No. 137, and Winton, No. 108.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

—————————

OTAGO.

Hiram, No. 46.—The regular meeting was held in the Lodgeroom, Cargill Road, on the 23rd March

Notwithstanding the inclement weather, there was a good attendance. W. Bro. A. P. Frederic was elected as

the representative to the annual communication of G.L. Three candidates for initiation were balloted for and

elected, also two brethren for affiliation, one being our esteemed Bro. P. J. Helean, P.M., of Lodge Celtic,

No. 477, S.C. One brother was passed to the Second. Degree, the ceremony being conducted by the W.M.

Bro. J. McNaughton, assisted by Bro. W. H. Turley, P.M. (Secrets), Bro. Rayner (S.E. Charge), Bro. Sisters

(W.Ts.), Bro. Logic (Final Charge), and W. Bro Parker. P.M. (T.B.). A P.M.'s diploma was presented to W.

Bro. W. H. Turley, I.P.M., by W. Bro. Parker, P.M. The Lodge closed at 9.45 p.m., and the brethren spent a

pleasant half-hour in the refectory.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Clinton, No. 183.—The regular meeting was held at Clinton on the 1st April, Bro. R. G. Shepherd presiding.

The business was the election of a representative to G.L. communication in Invercargill in May next, and

passing four brethren. W. Bro. Wm. Brown, I.P.31., was elected to represent the Lodge. The ceremony of

passing was performed in a very pleasing manner. The W.M. welcomed several visitors, prominent among

whom were the W.M. and two brethren of Lodge St. John (Milton). These visitors are always cordially

welcomed at Lodge Clinton. The W.M. said that he hoped this visit would be the forerunner of many such

visits between this Lodge and Lodge St. John (Millon). A committee was formed to go into the whole matter

of building a home of our own, the opinion being expressed that the time was ripe for this, especially as the

Lodge had recently received a generous gift of a building site. — [Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Ionic, No. 191.—At the regular meeting, on the 12th April, there was a good attendance, W.M. Bro. W. T.

Smellie presiding. The ceremonial working. of the Third Degree was entrusted to the Pals., who occupied the

stations they originally held at the foundation of the Lodge eight years ago, and it says much for the interest

these brethren have in the work, that the ceremony was excellently and impressively carried out. W. Bro. J.

L. Miller was W.M., W. Bro. A. Smellie S.W., W. Bro. H. P. Bremner J.W., W. Bro. J. A. McPhee Chaplain,

W. Bro. J. C. McClymont D. of C., W. Bro. S. F. Bridgman S.D., W. Bro. J. Pringle, I.G. The Fourth Degree

was a fitting complement to the proceedings in the Lodgeroom. In responding to the toast of "The P.Ms.," W.

Bro. J. L. Miller said it had given him great pleasure to work the degree with the original officers—now

P.Ms. —his early associates. W. Bro. Henry Wilson gave a particularly fine expression of the teachings of,

and the duties imposed by, the Third Degree, and proposed "The Candidate." W. Bro. A. Smellie gave a very

interesting chat on things he had seen and heard, and on what had impressed him during his recent lengthy

visit to America and England. This proved particularly instructive, and reflected W. Bro. Smellie's quick

perception and keen judgment.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————————

CANTERBURY.

Unanimity, No. 3.—The regular meeting was held on the 6th April, when there was a very good attendance.

The W.M., W. Bro. F. H. Law was in the chair, and was supported by several of our own, as well as visiting,

P.Ms. W. Bro. T. C. Hatton acted as S.W. in the absence of Bro. C. Owen. A candidate was initiated into

Freemasonry. The W.M. was assisted by W. Bros. Brown (W.M. of Lodge Conyers), Agar, Doreen (W.M. of

Lodge Crown), and C. Smith Final Charge. Bro. Flavell presented W. Bro. Smith, I.P.M., with his P.M.'s

diploma, and in doing so congratulated the recipient. After H.G.W. had been tendered, the Lodge closed, and

a pleasant time was spent in the refectory.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

St. Augustine, No. 4.— W. Bro. J. Buxter carried through his first meeting on the 13th April, in the

Christchurch Masonic Hall, and acquitted himself to the satisfaction of all present. Owing to the Easter

holidays intervening, the balance-sheet was not available for discussion. W. Bro. Treas. stated that Lodge

dues did not balance expenditure, and gave formal notice of motion, on behalf of his Finance Committee, to

make a small increase. One brother was proposed as a joining member. Two candidates were initiated, and

the W.M was ably assisted by W. Bro. G. H. Hutton (W.M. of Lodge Moa, No. 110) and W. Bro. R. Browne

(W.M. Lodge Conyers, No. 1912, E.C.). The N.E. Charge was entrusted to W. Bro. McGregor B. Wright,

who has almost reached that degree of excellence he endeavours to instil as Lodge Preceptor. V.W. Bro. T.

W. Rowe made of the long Charge after Initiation a real lesson in ethics, and if the candidates were

impressed in like manner to several brethren who have since spoken of the address, they have received a

solid foundation. Bro. F. C. A'Court, G. Organist (S.W. of Civic Lodge), and several musical brethren gave

much appreciated assistance in making the refectory hour all too short.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Ashley, No. 28.—The installation meeting was held on the 11th March, with a record attendance, numbering

135, to honour the W.M.-elect (Bro. T. Shankland). The ceremony was conducted by R.W. Bro. F. C. B.

Bishop, Prov.G.M., and officers of Prov.G.L. W. Bro. T. Kirker, Prov.G.Sec., invested, and W. Bro. D. L.

Collett, Prov.S.G.W., addressed Bro. H. A. Archdale as S.W., and Bro. D. A. Innes, J.W. W. Bro. S. R.

Smith, Prov.D. of C., invested the following officers :— Chaplain, W. Bro. R. Ball; Treas., Bro. A. H. Tyler;

Sec., Bro. E. N. Blackett ; D. of C., W. Bro. H. D. Bettger, P.P.G.St.B.; S.D., Bro. H. Heney ; J.D., Bro. L.

Hile; Organist, W. Bro. J. T. Withers, P.P.G. Organist ; I.G., Bro. E. D. Rowe; Stewards, Bro. C. P. Ansford

and W. Bro. B. A. McKeown, P.P.G.S. ; Tyler, Bro. W. Shilton. The address to the brethren was given by W.

Bro. G. R. Hadfield, P.P.G.B.B. The collection in aid of the W. and O. and A.M. Fund was appealed for by

W. Bro. T. H. Knight, P.P.G.St.B., which resulted in £7 14s. 4d. being collected. The W.Ts. were presented

by W. Bro. S. Jackson, W. Bro. Gainsford, and W. Bro. C. McIntosh, and W. Bro. T. J. Kennedy did so in

the B. of I.M. R.W. Bro. F. C. B. Bishop, Prov.G.M., presented the I.P.M., W. Bro. H. Farrelly, with the

P.M.'s jewel, who thanked the brethren for the gift. The trumpet calls were given by Bro. Richards (of Lodge

Southern Cross, No 6.). H.G.W. were received from a large number of Lodges and brethren. At the

conclusion of the ceremony refreshments were served in the Oddfellows' Hall. The usual toasts were

honoured, and a most enjoyable evening was spent.— [Lodge Correspondent.]

————

St. Augustine, No. 99.—The regular meeting was held on the 2nd March, W. Bro. C. Manchester presiding,

one candidate being initiated into Freemasonry. The Ob. and Secrets were given by the W.M., the Charge in

the N.E. by W. Bro. Hoskins, the Ex. of Prep. by W. Bro. James Manchester; and the Charge after Initiation

by W. Bro. Colville. After the Lodge closed the newly initiated brother was entertained in the refectory, song

and story being the order of the evening, and a very pleasant time was spent.

The regular meeting was held on the 14th April, W. Bro. C. E. Manchester being in the chair. The

ceremonial work was the Second Degree, the W.M. being assisted by W. Bro. Colville (Charge after

Investiture), W. Bro. Fulton (S.E.), and Bro. A. Jones (W.Ts.). After closing a pleasant hour was spent in the

refectory, where the usual toasts were duly honoured.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Robert Burns, No. 139.—The regular meeting was held in the Masonic Temple, Christchurch, on the 20th

April. W. Bro. G. A. Blackmore, W.M., presided, and there was a large attendance. Among the visitors were

representatives of most of the local Lodges, as well as Lodges in Auckland and Dunedin. Two candidates

were initiated, the W.M. being assisted during the ceremony by Bro. MacRae, J.W. (Charge after

Investiture), W. Bros. R. W. S. Eastwood (N.E. Corner), A. Hunter (R. for Prep.), Doreen, W.M. Crown

Lodge (W.Ts.), and T. Kirker (Final Charge).—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————————

HAWKES BAY.

Scinde, No. 5.— An emergent meeting was held on the 30th March. The W.M. presided over an average

attendance. The business was to raise two brethren. An invitation having been extended to Lodge Heretaunga

to work the degree. W. Bro. R. W. Jones was in attendance with his officers and brethren in numbers which

left no doubt that a great compliment had been paid to Lodge Scinde, no less than thirty being present with

him, including R.W. Bro. T. Morgan, G.J.W. The work was carried out with smoothness and solemnity, and

reflected great credit on W. Bro. Jones and his officers, The proceedings in the refectory reflected the cordial

relationship existing between the Lodges, where R.W. Bro. Morgan expressed his pleasure at again being

with Scinde, brethren after an absence of some five years through illness.—[The conciseness of this report is

highly commendable.— ED.C.]

An emergent meeting was held on the 13th April, the W.M. presiding. The special business was to pass five

brethren. The work was carried out by the W.M., who was assisted by his officers and P.Ms. The Lodge was

honoured by the attendance of M.W. Bro. H. J. Williams, P.G.W., V.W. Bro. J. H. Sykes, G. Chaplain, V.W.

Bro. G. Russell, G.D. of C, and also Bro. McDonald, late of Otago. Later the visitors were entertained in the

refectory, their company being much enjoyed by Scinde brethren.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————————

AUCKLAND.

United Service, No. 10.—The labour at the regular meeting held on the 31st March was the raising of four

brethren. The Lodge was favoured by having an especially large number of visitors present on that occasion,

including W. Bros. Connelly (W.M. Lodge St. Andrew, No. 8), A. N. McKelvey (W.M. Lodge Auckland,

No. 87), Drew (Lodge Eden, E.C.), and Bro. Morgan (Lodge Windsor, No. 72, Victoria, Australia), who is

an annual and very welcome visitor). The W.M. (W. Bro. M. Berry) was assisted by W. Bros. Erickson,

Pelham, Swales, and Spinley. W. Bro. Connelly addressed the newly-raised brethren after the investiture.

The T.H. by W. Bro, Pelham. The Lodge being in mourning, no toasts were honoured or harmony indulged

in. —[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Hikurangi, No. 140.— The installation of the W.M. and investiture of officers took place on the 9th April.

The large attendance somewhat taxed our seating accommodation, visitors being present from Whangarei,

Nelson, Hokianga, and other places, to do honour to the W.M.-elect (Bro. J. Rutherford). The ceremony was

most ably conducted by W. Bro. A. M. McLeod (Lodge Whangarei No. 102). W. Bros. C. M. Whelan

(Victory Lodge, No. 40) ,and A. McPhee (Lodge Whangarei, No. 1647, E.C.) acted as presenting officers,

and W. Bro. M. McInnes (Lodge Whangarei, No. 102) D. of C. The following brethren were invested :—

W.M., Bro. J. Rutherford; I.P.M., W. Bro. C. B. Kerr; D. of C., W. Bro. K. McBeth, P.M. ; S.W., Bro. J. W.

B. Kerr; J.W., Bro. H. W. S. Cheeseman; Treas., Bro. W. Lauder; Sec., W. Bro. E. W. Rickard, P.M.;

Organist, W. Bro. A. M. Rust, P.M. ; Chaplain, W. Bro. R. Hamilton, I.P.M. ; S.D., Bro. F. H. Kells; J.D.,

Bro. E. P. Cunnold; I.G., Bro. R. J. Patton; S.S., Bro. W. Barstow ; J.S., Bro. H. J. S. Pearson; Tyler, Bro. J.

Hamilton. Bros. J. Rutherford and R. J. Patton were appointed Auditors. The W.Ts. were presented by W.

Bros. W. J. M. Dawson, C. M. Whelan, and Bro. Jas. Reid. Certificates were presented to four brethren, after

which an adjournment was made to the Town Hall, where a sumptuous banquet was held. Various toasts

were proposed and felicitously responded to, and the function was brought to a close soon after midnight.

On Sunday, 11th April, twenty members attended the evening service at the Presbyterian Church. The Rev.

D. McNeur welcomed the brethren. He took for his text 1 Kings 8 : 10, and preached a most appropriate

sermon, which was attentively and interestingly listened to and heartily appreciated by all present.— [Lodge

Correspondent.]

————————

TARANAKI.

Ikaroa, No. 115.—The regular meeting was held at Opunake on the 13th April, when there was a good

muster. W. Bro. Penny, W.M., had met with a serious trap accident, and appeared in a crippled condition,

wherefore P.M. Bro. Hammond presided, and R.W. Bro. Corkill acted as I.P.M. A brother was raised, the

work of the degree being done is fine style by P.M. Bro. Rogers, assisted by Bro. Neilson, S.W., and P.M.

Bro. Watson. W. Bro. Rogers was appointed representative to G.L., and, failing him, R.W. Bro. F. P. Corkill.

The Lodge resolved to procure an enlargement of an autographed photograph of our late G. M. , Bro.

Plunket, and this, with a similar portrait of P.G.M. Bro. Williams, our Consecrating Officer and ever staunch

friend, will be assigned place of honour in the East. The brethren were glad to welcome P.M. Bro. Pelham, of

Raglan, one of one earliest members, and still on the roll.--[Lodge Correspondent.]

————————

RUAPEHU.

Manawatu Kil., No. 47.—The annual installation took place at Palmerston North on the 14t11 April, when

Bro. E. G. Tucker, S.W.; was inducted into the chair by R.W. Bro. D. McFarlane before a goodly number of

brethren. The R.W. brother was assisted by W. Bro. A. Torstonson as D. of C., R.W. Bro. J. A. Nash as

S.W., W. Bro. Clark as J.W., and W. Bro. W. Mundy as I.G. Bro. East presided at the organ, and he was

assisted by an excellent orchestra. After the installing of the W.M., the following were invested by W. Bro.

Hansard (P.M. of Lodge St. John, No. 37) as officers for the ensuing year :—S.W., Bro. E. V. West ; J.W.,

Bro. W. Mundy ; S.D., Bro. A. Worboys; J.D., Bro. A. H. M. Wright ; D. of C,, W. Bro. A. Torstonson ;

Sec., W. Bro. C. S. Rush; Treas., R.W. Bro. J. A. Nash (P.G.S.W.); Chaplain, W. Bro. A. Clark; I.G., Bro.

W. R. Douglas; Organist, Bro. C. J. East ; Choirmaster, Bro. S. E. Carson; Tyler, Bro. J. Marshall; S.S., Bro.

W. P. Henderson ; Bros. C. S. Pees, C. N. Mitchell, and W. Boon. Bro. S. E. Carson delighted the brethren

with a beautiful rendering of the solo. "But the Lord is mindful of His own." The W.Ts. were presented by

W. Bros. T. A. Moodie, F. Maud, and J. B. Lauchlan. The R.W. Installing Master gave the address to the

W.M., and presented him with the Charter, B. of C., and Bylaws. The address to the Wardens was delivered

by W. Bro. C. F. Spooner (of Lodge Huia), and that to the brethren by R.W. Bro. J. A. Nash, P.G.S.W, R.W.

Bro. McFarlane presented P.Ms.' jewels to W. Bros. D. E. Dustin and E. R. B. Holben, who had both carried

out their years of office in a commendable manner. W. Bro. H. S. Porteous was presented by R.W. Bro. J. A.

Nash with a tribute from the brethren of the Lodge as some slight recognition of his services as Organist for

over seventeen years, which took the form of a cheque, Bro. Nash wishing him and Mrs. Porteous long life

and prosperity. H.G.W. were received from a large number of visiting brethren. The banquet was held in the

Municipal Hall, when a large concourse of brethren sat down to the good things provided by W. Bro. Dustin.

The R.W. Installing Master, in replying to a toast, exhorted the brethren to show in their daily lives the

fundamental truths on which Freemasonry is founded, particularly dwelling on brotherly love and charity,

and as this would be the last time in which he would address them as Prov.G.M., his remarks appeared to

greatly impress those present. During the evening items were given by the orchestra, Bro. C. H. Hodgson,

and Bro. S. E. Carson. The Tyler's toast brought to a close one of the most successful Masonic functions ever

held in Palmerston North, and great praise is due to W. Bro. E. R. B. Holben, I.P.M., and W. Bro. C. S.

Rush, Sec., for this.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Huia, No. 171.—The monthly meeting took place on the 1st April. W. Bro. A. J. Graham consented

conditionally to attend the annual meeting of G.L., circumstances permitting. The ceremonial consisted of

passing four brethren. The work was distributed as follows :—Ob., the W.M. ; S., T. and W., W. Bro.

Gallichan ; Charge after Investiture. W. Bro. Faulkner (Lodge Brooklyn) ; Charge in the S.E., W. Bro.

Neilsen (Lodge Waterloo) ; W.Ts., conjointly by the W.M. and the two Wardens; Final Charge, W. Bro. N.

D. Stubbs, I.P.M. One proposition was received for initiation, and one for affiliation. A meed of praise is due

to W. Bro. Graham, who so generously consented to act for a further term as Organist. Especially when we

consider all the multitudinous public duties, in addition to all others, he is called upon to discharge, he has

set an example many might well emulate as Craftsmen. We are looking forward to the fraternal visit of the

W.M., officers and brethren of Lodge Waterloo, who are due to work a degree. A short but pleasant time in

the refectory concluded the first meeting under the supervision of the present W.M.—[Lodge

Correspondent.]

————

Moutoa, No. 195.—There was an excellent attendance at the meeting held on the 25th March. There was no

degree work, the main business being the election of officers. Bro. J. C. Arnold, S.W., was declared W.M.-

elect. There was keen competition for the office of Stewards. On retiring to the refectory the amount of

heather included in the table decorations, the large amount of Scotch confectionery conspicuous, and the

tartan ribbon that adorned the necks of vessels whose holding capacity was full of "Scotch," was sufficient to

acquaint the brethren that the "Fourth" was to take the form of a Scotch night, and later, when the strains of

the bagpipes were heard, and the swing doors of the refectory were thrown wide open to admit W. Bro.

Munro with the pipes heading a procession of much pomp, in the centre of which was W. Bro. Symes,

supporting with great dignity a steaming hot Scotch haggis, it was forcibly driven home to the brethren that

those responsible had left nothing to be desired in attending to details. The replies to the toasts, which dealt

with such subjects as Scotch music, Scotch customs, Scotch humour, etc., were not only humorous and

entertaining, but also educational. The Scotch Night was declared by all present to be an unqualified

success.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————————

WELLINGTON.

Tutanekai, No. 156. — The regular meeting was held in the Masonic ITall, Berhampore, on the let April,

the W.M. (Bro. Key) presiding over a fair attendance. After disposing of routine business, the ceremonial

(raising two candidates) was proceeded with. The W.M. obligated the candidates, and was assisted in the

work by VV. Bro. Alexander (Exhort.), W. Bro. Anderson (raising first candidate), W. Bro. Martin (second

candidate), W. Bro. Ivory (S. T. and W.), W. Bro. Harrap (T.H.), Bro. Morton, J.W. (W.Ts,), Bro. Read,

S.W. (Final Charge). W. Bro. Hutchings (Lodge Pacific) presented W. Bro. Martin with his certificate. The

Lodge closed at 9.45, and the usual adjournment was made.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Waiwhetu, No 176.—The monthly meeting was held on the 14th April, when there was a large attendance

of brethren and also of visitors, it being the annual interchange of visits between the two sister Lodges,

Ulster and Waiwhetu. Lodge Ulster turned up in large numbers, and took part in the ceremony of initiating

one brother. W. Bro. Y. G. Carver obligated and communicated the S., T. and W.: Bro. Armstrong, S.W.,

invested and presented the W.Ts. ; W. Bro. Colquitt gave the Charge after Investiture; Bro. Scott, J.W., gave

the N.E. Charge; Bro. Melhuish explained the R. for Prep. ; and W. Bro. Steffensen gave the Charge after

Initiation. Two brethren were elected as joining brethren. H.G.W. were tendered on behalf of several visiting

Lodges and brethren. After the Lodge was closed a pleasant hour was spent in the refectory.—[Lodge

Correspondent.]

————

Otari, No. 190.—The regular meeting was held at Ngaio on the 13th April, W. Bro. Tanner presiding. One

brother was passed to the F.C. Degree. W. Bro. Tanner was assisted by S.W. Bro. Craig, Bros. W. E.

Nicholls (Organist), Colpus, Harland, and Johansen, the Final Charge being delivered by S.W. Bro. Craig.

The Lodge retired to the refectory, where a pleasant hour was spent.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————

Mokoia, No. 213.—The regular meeting was held in Wellington South on the 23rd March, W. Bro. L. A.

George being in the chair. There was a very large attendance. The W.M. of Lodge Tutanekai, No. 156,

accompanied by his officers and brethren, paid an official visit. The principal business was to pass four

brethren. W. Bro, L. A. George was assisted by W. Bros. C. H. Dement, O. Neilson, and R. H. Wilson, S.W.

Bro. H. H. Flanagan, J.W. Bro. J. E. F. Perry, S.D. Bro. T. Robertson, S.S. Bro. T. F. Sparks, and J.D. Bro.

R. Binns. The Final Charge was given by S.W. Bro. H. H. Flanagan. Sincere regret was expressed at the

absence through ill-health of W. Bro. H. V. Futter. W. Bros. A. A. George, R. H. Wilson, and H. Ivory were

elected Trustees of the. Lodge. To fill the vacancy caused by the resignation of Bro. F. W. Raven, Bro. G. W.

Jenner was appointed J.S. The meeting was brought to a close in the usual manner, and a pleasant hour was

passed at the festive board, where the usual toasts were honoured, interspersed with musical and elocutionary

items.—[Lodge Correspondent.]

————————

ROYAL ARCH CHAPTERS.

St. Augustine, No. 1.—The regular convocation was held in the Chapter-room Christchurch, on the 14th

April. V.E. Comp. H. Hopkinson, Z., presided over a

fair attendance of companions. After the regular

business, Chapter was adjourned, and W.E.M. Geo.

Yemm opened a Lodge of E.Ms. Two brethren were

acknowledged, the W.E.M. being assisted by

P.W.E.Ms. F. C. B. Bishop, S. Clifton Bingham, and

W.E.M. G. Gorton. Included amongst the visitors

was V.E. Comp. G. H. Hutton (Egmont Chapter, No.

37). The usual harmonious hour in the refectory

concluded an enjoyable evening.—[Chapter

Correspondent.]

————

Egmont, No. 37.—The annual meeting took place

on the 16th April, and a record number signed the

book. This was all the more pleasing in view of the

fact that this was the concluding meeting of what

might be termed a R.A. festival week. Many of the

companions had spent the first three days of the

week in Wanganui as guests of the River Town

Chapter, on Thursday the annual reunion of the

Chapters of the district was held at Hawera, and on

Friday the Egmont installation took place at

Inglewood. M.E. Comp. T. Hobson, G.Z., attended

the meeting, and the companions of Egmont fully

appreciated the honour, this being the first occasion

that a G.Prin. has visited this end of the district. The

ceremonial work was ably done by R.E. Comp. A. J.

Graham, G.H., who is now in charge of Ruapehu

District, and the hope was expressed that R.E.

Comp. Graham would long continue to have the

oversight of this district. The R.E. Installing

Principal was well supported by V.E. Comps.

Gallichan and Sinclair, both of Manawatu Chapter.

The investiture of officers was done by V.E. Comp.

Copestake, who also acted as D. of C., and both

duties were performed in his usual thorough find

capable manner. In the refectory later in the evening

a pleasant hour was spent, the outstanding features

being, first, a speech by M.E. Comp. Hobson, in

which compliment, kindly criticism, and earnest,

sensible advice were well blended, and, second, an

address by R.E. Comp. Graham, G.Supt., on the

ideals of Capitular Freemasonry. The following are

the officers for the coming year :— Z., V. E. Comp.

W. H. Besley; H., E. Comp. G. Smart ; J., E. Comp,

Wm. Power; S.E., V.E. Comp. J. McAllister; S.N.,

E. Comp. G. Taylor ; D. of C., V.E. Comp. F.

Copestake 1st Soj., E. Comp. F. J. Hodges ; 2nd

Soj., E. Comp. W. Dean ; 3rd Soj., E. Comp. T. G. Grubb ; Janitor, Comp. S. O. Spurdle.—[Chapter

Correspondent.]

————————

A. AND A. RITE.

Nelson, No. 35, S.C.—The installation took place on Saturday, 17th April. The S.I.G., Ill. Bro. Geo. Barclay,

33 deg., made a hurried trip over from Wellington and conducted the ceremony. Previous to the installation,

Ill. Bro. Barclay gave a lengthy and interesting exemplification of the Seventeenth Degree. The following

officers were invested :— M.W.S., Ill. Bro. B. H. Moller; I.P.M.W.S., Ill. Bro. S. Kirkpatrick; D.M.W.S., Ill.

Bro. E. B. Fleming ; Sec., Ill. Bro T. Mant. The Lodge was tastily and effectively decorated with a variety of

flowers, roses, etc., bright scarlet being the predominating tone.—[Chapter Correspondent.]

————

Wellington, No. 91.—The quarterly conclave was held in the Chapter-room, Boulcott Street, on the 16th

April, Bro. J. Rod, M.W.S., presiding over an excellent attendance. The Rite of Perfection was conferred

upon one candidate by the M.W.S. and officers, assisted by Bros. Williams, Veitch, Read and Foss. The late

Bro. G. Allport was affectionately referred to, and his memory was reverenced in the customary manner.

Several letters were ordered to be sent to brethren distressed in mind, body or estate. A motion was

unanimously agreed to recommending E. and P. Bro. A. Veitch for preferment to the 30 deg. The usual

pleasant hour was spent in the refectory.