
A MOST distinguished brother in the Dominion recently expressed the opinion, which will readily be
concurred in, that the people of New Zealand having been immune from the danger of war, and not having
witnessed any of its horrors, even in the transit of wounded men, are unable to appreciate the state of feeling
and high tension which prevails among all classes in Great Britain. And this failure of realisation must be our
excuse for some surprise in connection with a "problem" which is presumed to have arisen in the Old
Country, the authority for which is no less than the "London Freemason." From our contemporary we learn
that a difficulty has arisen as to the position of German and Austrian brethren who are members of English
Lodges. And it says :—
"The case of our German and Austrian brethren in English Lodges is one of those questions where our
loyalty as Masons to our country on the one hand, and our adherence to Craft principles and rules on the
other hand, compel us to become polemical, even against our desires, for it is a saddening subject. There
is quite a variety of opinion, but an easy division can be made into three groups. There are those who call
for the immediate expulsion of alien members. A more moderate measure is suggested whereby such
brethren should be asked by the W.M. to consider themselves under an implied suspension rather than an
actual one, and stand aloof from all Masonic meetings for the time being, their subscriptions of course
being also suspended. The third course is, as before suggested, for all parties to take no notice of
nationality when assembled as Masons. Each of these methods are fraught with difficulties. "
Though we may not have a proper conception of the war feeling in England, we are still somewhat astounded
at the first two suggestions as herein stated. Masonic expulsion is the greatest punishment that can be
inflicted, but before such sentence can be pronounced certain procedure has to be adopted of a judicial
character, which is calculated to safeguard as far as possible the interests of the accused. Imprimis, a specific
charge must be preferred, and be proved up to the hilt. But here we have no suggestion of offence; it is
simply that certain brethren are of a nationality belligerent to Great Britain. That is no crime, and may only
be a misfortune according to the visual line of sight. If the brother who is alien to the country in which he
resides performs any act contrary to the laws of such country, he violates his Masonic obligation, and thereby
the regulations of the Craft, and could properly be impeached, but the transgression would have to be proved,
and ample opportunity must be given the accused to make his defence. Failing offence there is no Masonic
law that would permit expulsion simply because of alienage. A brother in discussing the question in the
"Freemason," refers to German atrocities, which in our opinion is most improper, as there is no suggestion of
any kind that the German members of London Lodges were particeps criminis. The second suggestion
contained in our contemporary's article, that alien brethren should be asked by the W.M. to consider
themselves under an implied suspension and stand aloof from all Masonic meetings, is almost offensive. If
there is one section of any community more than another that should believe in the complete innocence of a
member until guilt is proved, it is the institution of Freemasonry. This is a time when Freemasonry should
rise above nationality, and the brother of foreign extraction whose country is at war with ours, merits our
sympathies, so long as he conforms to Masonic law, which is in itself security against any breach of the law
of the State in which he resides. He is a small minority in his Lodge, occupying a most difficult position,
which should be made as easy as possible for him by the fraternal kindness of the large majority. Our London
contemporary concludes its article as follows :— " What appears to be the wisest course is to give alien
brethren to understand that, as Craftsmen, we acknowledge no change in fraternal feelings, but, as there are
some who would surely find unpleasant thoughts and feelings arising if they met these foreign brethren in
Masonic gatherings, the truly Masonic course is to abstain from attendance, and thus give no cause for regret
or offence. They will readily see the desirability of such precaution."
We regret we must join issue on this point, as we do not agree that there is any "truly Masonic course" in
impelling any worthy brother from enjoying his Masonic privileges indefinitely. It should never be forgotten
that one effect of the present war will be to prove Freemasonry. It is only in the greatest stress that the metal
of the nation, the institution, or the individual is tested. If it rings true, if the refining test is passed, the just
reward will be merited. Freemasonry has ever made a profession of Brotherly Love, Relief, and Truth. Now
is the time to put these principles into practice. Brotherly Love will not allow the Masonic death of a brother,
simply for a nation's offence or criminality. Relief is not comprehended in donating pecuniary assistance, but
in the far greater humanitarian work of giving assistance to those afflicted in mind, body, or estate. And Truth
demands that Freemasons must practice those excellent precepts, which they so ardently profess, otherwise
such professions can only be characterised as sounding brass or tinkling cymbals. And the man outside the
pale of the Craft may have just cause for his belief that Freemasonry has been weighed in the balance and
found wanting.
———————
THE G.L. of France has written to the G.L. of New Zealand pointing out the misery and suffering entailed by
the war; stating it had decided to open (a) an ambulance for the wounded, without distinction of nationality
or religion, (b) a service of free meals, and (c) a service of domestic help for sick women; and appealing for
financial assistance. It was resolved by the Board to vote the sum of 100 from the General Fund, subject to
the G.Reg. being satisfied that such a vote was legal, and that the M.W.G.M. confirmed the vote.
———————
THE SILVER JUBILEE OF THE G.L. OF NEW ZEALAND.
———<>———
On the 29th April, 1891, the first communication of the G.L. of New Zealand was held in Christchurch. At
that meeting the officers were elected, all necessary business was transacted, and on the following evening
the G.M., the late M.W. Bro. Henry Thomson, was installed and his officers were invested. The meeting was
attended by some 300 brethren, representative of the whole of the then "colony," and marked a distinct epoch
in the history of Freemasonry in New Zealand. Of the 92 Lodges that had six months earlier given their
adhesion to the new order of things by signing the declaration of allegiance, only 34 were represented at the
official opening. The fact that considerable delay had occurred in bringing G.L. into actual existence, after
the meetings of the General Conference held in September of the previous year, was largely responsible, but
it is satisfactory to note that later there were few depletions, and only some three Lodges ultimately
repudiated the declaration. It is not the intention of the writer to refer at this time to the history of the
movement, as possibly a few months later the time and purpose will be more opportune. Perhaps the saddest
reflection we have is in the fact that of the first officers elected by G.L. some twenty-five have passed to the
Great Beyond, including two distinguished brethren who were pillars of the movement, but whose names are
not even a memory to the great majority of the members of to-day. Need we say that we refer to M.W. Bro.
E. T. Gillen, one of the prime movers in the movement, and to the first G.M., the late M.W. Bro. Henry
Thomson, each of whom had devoted a life's service to Freemasonry, and their last thoughts were for its
future welfare. On the 12th of May next G.L. will be called upon to celebrate in some form the Silver Jubilee,
and it will devolve upon the government of the Craft to suggest a suitable form of commemoration, not of an
evanescent character, but something that will live as a monument of good, when the present generation has
passed away, and like its predecessors has ceased to be remembered. The M.W.G.M. has, we believe, given
some thought to the matter, and may probably be prepared to suggest a means of fittingly signalising the
occasion. In a subsequent issue we hope to be able shortly to review the rise and progress of G.L.
———————
AN EXPLANATION.
———<>———
The twenty-sixth annual communication of the G.L. of New Zealand will be held in the city of Wellington on
the 12th and 13th May next, and the Lodges throughout the district will have the opportunity of returning in
some measure the hospitality they have received in other parts of the Dominion in years past. A preliminary
meeting has been held, and the various committees in connection with the plan of organisation have been set
up. A word of explanation as to the precedure now generally adopted may be in season, seeing that some
little exception has been taken to the proposals made in the present instance. In the earlier history of G.L.,
and, indeed, as late as 1905, it was the custom for each city or town where G.L. met to be responsible for all
social functions in connection with the gathering. In the year named the meeting was held in Palmerston
North, and the whole cost had to be shouldered by the only Lodge in existence in that town, and the call was
nobly responded to. But after that experience a scheme was adopted, which has been in practice ever since,
viz., that each Lodge in the district should be asked to contribute a quota towards the entertainment of the
governing body, which plan has been found to work very well, as it has been generally recognised that the
honour is to the whole district, not to the particular city or town in which it is actually held. While it is
doubtless very nice for any place to be selected wherein to hold the Parliament of the Craft, yet it must not be
forgotten that each year increases the responsibility, the work, and the cost; and further, it is now becoming
almost impossible to hold the annual meetings in the smaller centres of population, owing to the large
accommodation required both for the meeting and lodgment of brethren. On this occasion the action taken by
the brethren of Wellington city has a precedent in every other district. It may further be observed that there is
no compulsion in the matter, consequently if any Lodge wishes to record its opposition, there is no reason
why it should not be done in a courteous and Masonic manner. When in May last G.L. decided to hold its
next meeting in the Wellington district, we expressed the hope that either Napier, New Plymouth, or
Wanganui should be accorded the honour, as three years hence the Capital City must be selected, as change
of office will then be made to Wellington, and a G.M. from the Wellington division of the Dominion will be
installed. And we still think that it is a matter of regret that the course indicated could not have been
followed, as it would have given what may be proved to be a last chance to one of the other towns in the
Wellington division of the Dominion to have had the meeting of the Parliament of the Craft in its midst.
———————
RETURN OF M.W. Bro. M. NICCOL, G.Sec., G.L. OF NEW ZEALAND.
———<>———
It was with the greatest pleasure we had the opportunity of welcoming M.W. Bro. Niccol on his return to
New Zealand on the 15th December, after a six months' holiday, which included a tour of Great Britain. Our
genial brother was looking remarkably well after his somewhat varied experience. Shortly after his arrival in
England war was declared, and the country resembled an armed camp, soldiers, soldiers everywhere, and
excitement reigned supreme. Bro. Niccol visited the G.Ls. of England and Scotland, and was received in the
most enthusiastic manner on both occasions. In both bodies Masonic business was entirely subsidiary to
patriotism. Our distinguished brother was unfortunate in suffering from indisposition, which rendered a
retreat to Bournemouth for a month indispensable. All his plans were laid for a trip through the Continent,
finally making Naples his port of departure, but the dogs of war upset the plan. The outward trip to Sydney
was made under most unfavourable circumstances. The ship being small and an old one, was entirely
unequal to the demands made upon it. Though the change has been most beneficial from a health point of
view, we are sure our brother is quite pleased to be home again, and will fully appreciate the quietude of New
Zealand after the period of excitement and strain he has passed through during. his sojourn in England. We
are sure all the brethren will join with the CRAFTSMAN in offering a most hearty welcome to Bro. and Mrs.
Niccol on their return to the Dominion of New Zealand.
———————————————————————————————————————————
News and Notes.
———————————————————————————————————————————
LODGE UNITED SERVICE, No. 10, has conferred the honour of life membership upon R.W. Bro. T. W. Allen
and Bro. Neumegen, who respectively held the offices of Sec. and Treas. of the Lodge for nearly thirty years,
and who relinquished active office a few months ago.
AT Lodge St. Andrew's annual meeting the retiring Master, W. Bro. Nielsen was the recipient of a very
handsomely chased and engraved jewel presented on behalf of his fellow-members. At the banquet
proceedings subsequently a P.M. paid of this brother that if he indicated a wish to see a couple of hundred
bricks transported to the top of a particular sky-scraper, nothing would be said, but one could depend that
those bricks would be there in due course neatly stacked; he had the knack. (The brother referred to has been
wondering since if he rests under a subtle accusation of indulging the "tired feeling.")
THE installation meeting of Lodge St. Andrew, held on its patron-saint's day, was very successful from all
points of view, and indicated careful preparation. The Lodge has emerged from a very prosperous year and
can look forward with confidence.
THE brethren generally will be sorry to hear that R.W. Bro. D. A. Jolly, P.G.S.W., is at present an inmate of a
private hospital in Auckland. It is to be hoped that news will soon be received of his being on the road to
convalescence.
R.W. BRO. E. P. LEE, D.G.M., has been elected to the Parliament of New Zealand as the member for Oamaru,
and R.W. Bro. R. Fletcher, P.D.G.M., as member for Wellington Central. We congratulate both brethren on
their success.
THE G.L. of South Australia is about to erect a temple in Adelaide, and in laying the corner-stone proposes to
have a setting maul composed of wood from all quarters of the world, for which purpose it has asked
contributions from all its correspondents.
WE learn that M.W. Bro. C. J. Griffiths, P.G.M., is living in London, where he has a number of relatives, and
that he is not likely to return to New Zealand for some considerable time, if at all.
THE M.W.G.M., Bro. J. J. Dougall, had a most successful tour in the Auckland District last month, and, as
might have been expected, received a very hearty welcome from the brethren.
AT the nomination of officers in the Masters' Lodge, 161 (Dunedin), the only nominee for the position of
W.M. was W. Bro. D. Hanis Hastings. W. Bro. T. Gallagher, who as Sec. has been the mainstay of the Lodge
for some years, desires to be relieved of this arduous office, and takes the position of J.W., his successor
being W. Bro. C. L. W. Lischner, who should make an admirable Scribe.
WE regret to learn that the genial G.Sec. of New South Wales, V.W. Bro. A. H. Bray, has had to undergo a.
serious operation, but are pleased to hear from latest advices he is slowly recovering.
THE R.A. Masons in New South Wales under the allegiance of the G. Chapter of Scotland are soliciting
authority to a referendum of the members, with reference to amalgamating with the Sup.G. Chapter of New
South Wales.
AT its November meeting the B. of G.P. of the G.L. of New Zealand adopted the following resolution :—"
That the R.W. Prov.G.M. of the Auckland District be requested to report on the advisability or otherwise of
dividing the Auckland district, at his earliest convenience."
CAPTAIN MUNRO, of the 2nd (Queen Alexandra) Mounted Rifles, and an officer of the. Wanganui Stock
Department, who has volunteered for the front, was on Saturday evening farewelled by a large gathering of
the Masonic fraternity, and presented with a fine pair of prismatic binoculars as a token of their esteem.
Captain Munro has gone into camp at Trentham.
THE Masonic orchestra attached to Lodge St. Andrew, Wellington, has earned great popularity, and is in
much request. We understand that its members contemplate a concert, the proceeds of which will be devoted
to the G.L. of New Zealand War Relief Fund.
THE G.L. of Pennsylvania is, without doubt, the wealthiest of the G. jurisdictions. Its assets to-day are from
ten to twenty million dollars. Just now it is nursing a trust fund, which will mature in a couple of years and
net two and a half million dollars. This fund is to be used for the establishment of a vocational school for
boys. This is certainly a most noble work, and illustrates the practical side of the Fraternity.
THE personal friendship which was a feature of the college days of the late King Edward and the Right Hon.
Thomas F. Halsey, Dep.G.M., is recalled by the announcement made during the present week that the son of
the Dep.G.M. has been appointed aide-de-camp to His Majesty the king. Bro. Captain Lionel Halsey, under
his new appointment, succeeds Rear-Admiral Morgan Singer, who ceases to hold office by reason of his
promotion. Bro. Captain Halsey was the first captain of the battle-cruiser "New Zealand," which recorded its
first achievement off Heligoland Bight. The captain's own first achievement was as a lieutenant of the
"Powerful," when he was in charge of that vessel's famous 4.7-inch gun during the siege of Ladysmith. —
"The Freemason," London.
THE annual convocation of the Sup.GR.A. Chapter of New Zealand will be held in Christchurch on the 3rd
February next. The only question of importance for consideration will be the action of the G. Chapter of
Scotland with regard to recognition.
W. BRO. R. B. B. WILLIS, P.G.D., and formerly Dep.G.Supt. of Auckland, was installed as W.M. of Lodge
Progress, Southbridge, last month. It speaks volumes for Bro. Willis's interest in the Craft, that after having
borne the heat and burden of the day in another part of the Dominion, as a ruler in the Craft, he is ready to
respond to the call of his brethren and take up the gavel for a further term.
THE G.M. of Maine ruled that Lodge funds are held by the Lodge in trust for the purposes of relief, and the
usual and necessary ordinary expenses of the Lodge, and could not properly be appropriated for the purchase
of a P.M.'s jewel for a retiring Master.
IT is somewhat singular that in February of next year there is no full moon, which will confuse the date of
meetings of moon Lodges under a strict reading.
LODGE WATERLOO has 355 shares in the Freemasons' Hall Co. and 5 in the Masonic Newspaper Co. We
believe the Treas. would be a happier man if these positions were reversed.
LODGE TIITANEKAI has eight brethren serving their King and Country in Samoa and Egypt, and others on the
way to the front.
———————
SOUTHLAND NOTES.
———<>———
The installation meeting of Lodge Taringatura was a pronounced success. The Prov.G.M., R.W. Bro. Wm.
Timpany, conducted the ceremony. Eighteen brethren were present from Invercargill, several of whom
assisted in the ceremony. The attendance totalled 65, including 20 P.Ms. At the after meeting light
refreshments were substituted in lieu of the annual banquet. The War Fund of G.L. will benefit by some £20
by this one effect alone.
It is interesting to learn that Lodge Fortitude contains two veteran choir singers, W. Bro. E. Johnson having a
continuous record of 57 years, and W. Bro. E. Parker of 50 years. Quite recently Bro. Parker was presented
with a handsomely-mounted walking stick to commemorate his jubilee as a chorister.
W. Bro. A. Jolly was present by special invitation at last regular meeting of St. John's Lodge. His discourse at
the after meeting was particularly appropriate and admirably delivered. If the instruction so eloquently
imparted to the newly-raised brethren and, incidentally, to the members of the Craft present, be retained in
their memories and be acted upon through life, W. Bro. Jolly will have done much to serve Freemasonry
during his brief but busy visit to Southland.
On the 16th inst. Southern Cross Lodge (20 strong) paid a visit to Lodge Harvey, and worked the Third
Degree. The meeting passed off happily, and the visitors were afterwards entertained in true Masonic style.
R.W. Bro. Wm. Timpany, Prov.G.M., was present, and contributed in no small degree to the pleasure of the
meeting.
———————
AUCKLAND NOTES.
———<>———
The annual meeting of Lodge Maungawhao, No. 168, was conducted by M.W. Bro. Oliver Nicholson,
Prov.G.M., who installed Bro. C. Hudson as W.M. There was as usual a large and representative gathering of
Auckland brethren upon the occasion. The W.Ts. in the three degrees were presented by W. Bro. W.
Bridgman (W.M. Lodge St. Andrew, No. 8), W. Bro. W. Coltman (W.M. Lodge Albion, No. 45), and W. Bro.
W. R. Leighton (W.M. Lodge Waitakerei, No. 170). The address to the W.M. was delivered by R.W. Bro. F.
Kearsley, P.D.G.M., and that to the Wardens by R.W. Bro. J. Catchpole, S.G.W., while R.W. Bro. G. Barclay,
P.S.G.W., gave the address to the brethren. The presiding officers were W. Bro. Endean (W.M. of Ara Lodge,
No. 1), and W. Bro. Arnold (W.M. of Lodge Auckland, No. 87).
* * * *
The visit made by the G.M. to the Waikato and to Te Aroha was much appreciated by the local brethren. At
both places the meetings were well attended, and the address given by the G.M. attentively listened to. The
G.M. was accompanied on his tour by R.W. Bros. Powley and Catchpole.
* * * *
The three Lodges at the Thames are now arranging for the formation of a United Board of Inquiry for that
town and district.
* * * *
Amongst the visitors at the November meeting of the Auckland Provincial Chapter, No. 9, was R.E. Comp.
Porritt. The G.Supt. (R.E. Comp. Kearsley), in a few well-chosen words, conveyed a welcome to the
distinguished companion, who expressed his appreciation of the reception given him.
* * * *
The new W.M. of Lodge Franklin, No. 58 (Pukekohe) is W. Bro. M. McIntyre, who was recently installed
into the chair by the Prov.G.M.
* * * *
The annual meeting of Lodge Alexandra, No. 1188, E.C. took place at Pirongia on 2nd December. W. Bro. C.
Jenkins, Dist. Pres. B. of G.P. acted as Installing Master, and placed Bro. S. H. West in the Chair, Bros. H.
Fear and H. Burchell being subsequently invested as Wardens. The presentation of the W.Ts. was arranged as
follows :—W. Bro. Lewis (Alpha), W. Bro. Bishop (Waipa), and W. Bro. Camaron (Tawhiri). W. Bro.
Wiseman, D.G.Treas., addressed the Master and Wardens, and W. Bro. Jenkins delivered the address to the
brethren.
* * * *
A very pleasing feature at the annual meeting of the United Masters' Lodge, No. 167, was the recognition of
services rendered to the Craft by W. Bro. Josiah Martin, I.P.Ms of the Lodge. M.W. Bro. Nicholson, on
behalf of the members, asked Bro. Martin's acceptance of a purse of sovereigns, and in doing so referred to
that brother's eminent services as a Masonic lecturer and student during a period extending over many years.
Bro. Martin, who is now in failing health, briefly but feelingly acknowledged the presentation.
* * * *
Lodge Takapuna, No. 202, has received an excellent start. The brethren have been lavish in the matter of
presentations, and the greater part of the furniture, etc., has come to the new Lodge in the form of gifts. The
Lodge opens with 40 members, which number will no doubt be quickly increased.
* * * *
During the visit of the G.M. to the Waikato, the brethren of Lodge Tawhiri at Frankton Junction, had the
privilege of receiving an informal visit from M.W. Bro. Bengall during the afternoon. The G.M. was shown
over the Lodgeroom and entertained by the local brethren.
* * * *
As an evidence of the interest which some country brethren take in their Lodges, it is worthy of mention that
one of the members of Lodge Nau Mai (Taumarunui), who lives in the rough and rugged country lying
between the Stratford-Whangamomona, railway and the Main Trunk, rode a distance of 70 miles on
horseback in order to be present at the annual meeting of his Lodge.
* * * *
W. Bro. H. L. Wade, the retiring W.M. of Lodge Maungawhao, No. 165, was the recipient of a fine jewel
from the members of the Lodge upon his vacation of the chair.
* * * *
The collection in aid of the W. and O. and A.M. Fund which was made at the annual meeting of Lodge
Maungawhao, although perhaps not equalling some of the Lodge's previous efforts, was a very handsome
contribution, especially when the state of business at the present time is remembered. The sum of £54 8s.
was obtained.
* * * *
The W.M. of Lodge Waitakerei (W. Bro. Leighton) went to no end of trouble in his efforts to make the
opening of the new hall a success, and it must have been gratifying to him to see the excellent response to his
invitation. It is owing very largely to this W. brother's initiative that the hall proposal has been brought to a
successful issue.
* * * *
The annual communication of the District G.L. of Auckland E.C. was held on 1st December, and was
presided over by R.W. Bro. A. S. Bankart, D.G.M. The list of officers was follows :—D.G.M., Bro. A. S.
Bankart; D.D.G.M., Bro. W. S. Furby; D.S.G.W., Bro. N. Newcombe; D.P.G.W., Bro. Dr. G. Lapraik; D.G.
Chaplain, Bro. Rev. W. E. Connolly; D. G. Chaplain, Bro. Rev. T. O'Callaghan, D.D.; D.G.Treas., Bro J. F.
Colegrove; D.G.Reg., Bro. G. M. Newton; Pres.B. of G.P., Bro. C. H. Jenkins; Pres.B. of B., Bro. F. L.
Armitage) ; D.G.Sec., Bro. W. W. Daw; D.G.S.D., Bro. J. W. Proud ; D.G.J.D., Bro. E. D. Smith; P.D.G.S.D.
(past rank), Bro. T. H. Wilson; D.G.Supt. of W. Bro. D. W. Jack; P.D.G.Supt. of W. (past rank), Bro. E.
Hartshorne; D.G.D. of C., Bro. A. S. C. Brown; Asst. D.G.D. of C., Bro. C. F. Miller; D.G. Sd.B., Bro. G. E.
Harnett; D.G.St.B., Bro. J. Hare; D. G. St.B., Bro. E. J Wilkins ; D.G. Organist, Bro. R. Leslie Hunt ;
D.G.Purs., Bro. J. J. Kirkbride; Asst. D.G.Purs., Bro. J. F. Kelly; D.G. Tyler, Bro. T. M. Green; D.G. Stewards,
Bros. T. Linton, T. McFarlane, B. L. Catt, F. E. F. Weir, G. W. Sim, G. H. Wansbone.
* * * *
At the termination of his Auckland visit the G.M. journeyed to Gisborne, where a special meeting of the
Abercorn Lodge was held, at which the Gisborne brethren were present in large numbers, and at which the
distinguished brother was welcomed.
* * * *
At the installation meeting of Lodge Alexandra, No. 1188, E.G. (Pirongia), W. Bro. F. D. Wood, P.M. of the
Lodge, received from the brethren a P.M's. jewel in recognition of his services, rendered in many and varied
capacities to the Lodge.
———————————————————————————————————————————
THE INITIATE AND HIS LODGE.
———<>———
(A Paper read in Robert Burns Lodge, No. 139, by W. BRO.
R. W. BRIGHTLING, D. of C., 17th November, 1914.)
(Note.—The P.Ms. of Robert Burns Lodge have formed themselves into a committee to deliver monthly
papers on various subjects to the Lodge, this ensuring the P.Ms. being in intimate touch with the Lodge, as
well as affording instruction to the younger brethren.)
As the years roll along competition in every department of life becomes more keen. This is said to be due to
the revival of learning, and as students of social life it is right and proper that we should understand the
character of the forces producing it. The first part of our First Lecture asserts that learning was limited to the
few, who took good care to conceal it and confine the functions of society to their grasp. No wonder, then,
that small progress was made. In our day the process of education is the one means of keeping abreast of the
advanced; the spirit of enquiry must be cultivated. No process of education is controlled by religious
societies or convocations; every branch of learning is now untrammelled. Thus education has become the
great field of activity among all people. The position which the Masonic body holds is a high one, and
unquestionably it possesses great influence in swaying opinions—social, political, and so forth. It must, then,
be apparent to those who pride themselves on association with the Order that every effort should be made to
afford assistance and instruction to those admitted into it. Indifference to the instruction of the young of a
community is admitted to be prejudicial to the interest of the State. Is not such a like neglect of the
development of Masonic knowledge among our members contributing to the attendance at our meetings
almost solely to be amused? The common cry in reference to present-day sports is that there is a predilection
for watching instead of participation in the games. The advantages resulting from a reasonable participation
in manly games, particularly with those whose occupations do not embrace the development of physical
strength, can scarcely be over-estimated. It is that branch of learning which prepares a nation for its
protection, or even existence, and when a Lodge fails in its duty to afford instruction to its initiates it may
proportionately expect to receive resignations. There are hundreds of resignations in the Craft every year, and
like numbers are holding to membership and paying subscriptions on demand without being known, except
perhaps to some senior member. At the same time, and apart from contributing instruction as they ought to be
capable of doing, their attendance and association would assist the Order in its many deliberations in arriving
at a sound and definite good to the body as a whole. One .cannot visit without being an observer, and too
often observations are so unfavourable, and lack of knowledge so conspicuous and astounding, that in such
company good fellowship is out of the question.
The problem whether the initiate's position in the Order is favourable to his view or anticipations is of
consequence. The force of early impressions is widely acknowledged, and the ceremony of installing a
Master as ruler is periodically announced as a new idea. We should unquestionably capture the attention of
the initiate—rivet it, so to speak, to his state—and cause him to feel that the labour he has entered upon and
the company he has joined are alike profitable. Should the value of first impressions be assessed as
advantageous by the candidate at the time of his entrance into the Lodge, how much more to be appraised is
the association of gentlemen that sustain them ! Herein the qualifications of the candidate present
themselves. How is it possible that moral or mechanical instruction can be sustained or made attractive with
absence of fitness to receive or maturity of intellect to guide.
The Ancient Charges at makings proclaim that "he that be made be able in all degrees," and so forth. If a
rigid adherence to that decree were observed we would prove that we are solicitous to exclude from the
Fraternity all likely to become burdensome rather than useful, and have the happiness of communicating the
knowledge we possess to those only who are anxious to receive and profit by it.
The source whereby an initiate may obtain instruction of the right quality is not so much in the Instruction
Lodge, useful as it may be, as in the example of those surrounding him. In this respect it must be admitted
that those at the head are too ready to shield rather than admonish a transgressor into a career more to his,
and the Craft's credit. Often is the event for a Master, or by his mouthpiece, to admonish the initiate on the
chastening influence of temperance : "Let temperance chasten you ;" and yet within an hour the whole
company may be called upon to hearken to a song or anecdote, quite out of keeping with such candidates'
sentiments. Melody with the best of singers soon perishes, and a candidate present, with great hopes and
future resolves, feels that he is scandalised, inasmuch as he perceives the few conspicuous in the meeting by
their rank or office have lamentably failed to support the responsibilities of their position.
Few initiates are aware that they are members of the B.A. Lodge, and as such they have the right to be
present, and the right to be present carries with it the right to be instructed. Just for a moment consider a
condition upon which a man may be accepted for Freemasonry. He petitions for admission, and in the request
he says that he has a general desire for knowledge. Without that declaration, which he made in a solemn
manner, he could not have accepted. It may be taken for granted that that which is required on the one hand
in duty bound should be accorded on the other.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
———————
MANY MASONS DO NOT UNDERSTAND MASONRY.
———<>———
Evidences that many Masons do not understand Masonry are seen and heard every day. Brethren are
continually suggesting that the fraternity should do this and stop that, without knowing that the ideas that
they advance are directly opposed to the aims and objects of our institution.
The cause of all the confusion is ignorance, the force to which Masonry is irrevocably opposed. While
receiving the three degrees, the candidate has placed before him an outline of what Masonry is, and he is
admonished to apply himself to the study of the subject. Unfortunately, however, a very small per cent. of
those who receive the degrees attempt further education in Masonry after being enrolled as members.
Sometimes Masons will awaken to the necessity for knowledge, perhaps, and devote more time to learning
the lessons of life and less to adding of membership.
Our fraternity is made up largely of men who are so busy with material things as to think they have no time
for spiritual and moral development, a condition which is contrary to the fundamental basis of the institution.
The real purpose of Masonry is to develop the spiritual part of man, and efforts to satisfy his physical wants
are of secondary importance.
Our institution claims to bring men to light but fails in many of its attempts, because the Masonic meaning of
light is misunderstood often by those who are trying to teach.—"Orphans' Friend."
———————
IN REMEMBRANCE.
———<>———
" A LIFE WELL SPENT IN ACTS OF PIETY AND VIRTUE."
————
Freemasonry in general and the English Craft in particular has suffered almost irreparable loss by the death
of W. Bro. J. T. Lawrence, a Masonic writer of deserved repute, and whose fame is world wide. As the justly
popular vicar of a large parish, it speaks volumes for the late Bro. Lawrence's capacity for work that he was
enabled to devote so much time to literary work and the active practice of Freemasonry. As a Masonic writer
he achieved the exceptional distinction of being thoroughly understood. He made no pretence to being highly
scientific or deeply mystical, yet there was not a line in all his works that did not convey instruction and
appeal to the understanding of the youngest neophyte in Freemasonry. It was our privilege and pleasure to
comply with a request to review many of his books, and in one instance we suggested that the G.L. of N.Z.
would incur a wise expenditure in placing this copy in the hands of W.Ms. of all its Lodges, and though the
advice was not accepted by G.L., we believe we are correct in saying that the Prov.G.L. of Canterbury did
circulate this book to all the Lodges within the province.
In the appreciative notice of Bro. Lawrence's career, published by the "London Freemason" and reprinted in
this issue, we are not at all surprised to learn that our dear brother held a deep hold on the sympathetic
affections of the Brotherhood. A keen, observer, a reader of men, and broad-minded in all his views, it is
little wonder he was so deeply beloved in his own immediate sphere of action. Two years ago we received
the following letter from him,-which is characteristic of his kindly disposition :—
St. Peter's Vicarage,
Accrington, 8th January, 1913.
Dear Brother,—May I thank you very warmly for your kind review of " Masonic Jurisprudence " in your
issue, 2nd December. It is very cheering. I always enjoy reading the N.Z. CRAFTSMAN, from the days
when as a hard-up editor in Madras I used to look forward to its regular arrival to supply me with ideas
and material for my own journal. It is a thing upon which to be congratulated that your journal should
have gone on for so many years practically in unaltered form. I seem to recognise the very type on the
outer cover. With best New Year's wishes from—
Yours fraternally„
JOHN T. LAWRENCE.
May we with all reverence be permitted to say, in requiem : " Soft and safe to thee, my brother, be thy earthly
bed; bright and glorious be thy rising from it. Fragrant be the acacia sprig that there shall flourish ; and in the
bright morning of the world's resurrection may your soul awake to newness of life and expand in immortal
beauty in realms beyond the sky. Until then, dear brother, Farewell.
———————
MASONS ENGAGED IN WAR.
———<>———
The great war in Europe, so generally deplored, is the more regrettable by Masons because of the fact so
many of the brethren of the fraternity are engaged in it, in one or the other of the contending armies. The
"Masonic Standard" gives some interesting information, which we take the liberty of giving our readers, as
follows :-
The Emperor of Austria is the most Catholic of monarchs, and gives no countenance to Masonry in his
dominions. But it exists there under cover, and Hungary has a G.L. which has long been in fraternal relations
with the G.L. of New York.
In Servia Scottish Rite Masonry has recently obtained a footing, and when peace is restored our fraternity
will doubtless find a fallow field in that country. We are informed that Servian Masons maintain an
orphanage where no less than 2,600 orphans have been trained for their life work. With half of Europe
engaged in making orphans, this charity will have a growing importance.
In Russia Masonic Lodges were closed in 1822, for political reasons, and the order is still in force. The
Freemasons of Russia are not permitted to organise openly.
From England our Masonry is derived, and our Masonic relations with the Mother Country are most cordial,
as also with Belgium, Holland, and Italy. In France Masonry has been a great power for progress and liberty,
and although we are not in fraternal relations with the French Masons, we cannot fail to recognise the value.
of French Masonic influence in the peculiar conditions which prevail in the country.
German Masonry stands very high in our estimation. The German brethren are philosophers, and give to their
Masonry a dignity and seriousness which we well might imitate. Masonry in Germany is more exclusive than
in this country, and devotes its energies largely to the promotion of education and works of philanthropy.
One of the most distressing features of the war is that it disturbs temporarily the entente cordiale which has
existed between English and German Masons, and which received a great impetus last year by the visit of
Lord Ampthill, Pro-G.M. of the G.L. of England, together with a delegation of associate officers, to the
German G.Ls. at Berlin. The visitors were most hospitably received and entertained, and Lord Ampthill was
elected an honorary member of several of the G.Ls. On a number of occasions he responded to the addresses
of welcome in German, and of course, everybody concerned swore eternal friendship.
The loyalty of the German Masons to the Kaiser was abundantly shown last year at the various festival
communications held in celebration of his birthday and the twenty-fifth anniversary of his reign. Of touching
significance is the following, from the oration of G. Orator Adler, at the joint Festloge held in Berlin on 27th
January, 1913 :-
"The celebration of this festival fills our hearts with thanks, that we live in peace, feeling assured that
wise counsel guides our destiny and leads us to enjoy happiness and contentment and permits the full
enjoyment of our pleasure. In celebrating the day of rejoicing, at this time, we are recalling the struggles
and tribulations that our forefathers suffered in freeing themselves from foreign oppressors, and the
occurrences of those days are never to be forgotten, but have been indelibly recorded in the tablets of
history. Who can remember the year of 1813 without feeling in his heart the reaction of that great, holy,
and pure movement of our people, which was so extraordinary in history."
Masonry is for peace, but Masons are patriots, and respond with alacrity when their country calls to arms.
Ours were a querile society indeed if we could but cry "Peace ! Peace ! when there is no peace." The Masons
in the countries at war will perform their full duty as patriots, and will do what they may to mitigate the
horrors of the strife.
Let us hope that the entente cordiale so rudely interrupted may be restored at the earliest possible moment,
and that the animosities engendered by war may give way to feelings of amity and good will under the
influence of Masonic precept and practice.—'`The Tyler Keystone."
———————
VISIT OF THE M.W.G.M. TO AUCKLAND.
———<>———
The announcement that the G.M. would visit Auckland during November and would take part in several
Masonic functions roused a considerable amount of interest amongst the local brethren.
The ceremony of constituting and dedicating Lodge Takapuna, No. 202, which was carried out by the G.M.,
is fully reported elsewhere. This was the cause of a very fine gathering of the Craft, there being a numerous
representation of all the Constitutions.
Following the meeting at Takapuna, M.W. Bro. Dougall visited Te Aroha and Hamilton, and attended
meetings at both places, subsequently returning to Auckland.
It had been arranged by the M.W. Prov.G.M. (Bro. Oliver Nicholson) that the G.M. would meet the Auckland
brethren at the annual meeting of the United Masters' Lodge, No. 167, on Friday, 27th November, and
consequently the attendance of the brethren was such as to easily constitute a record for that Lodge. The
Prov.G.M. was first received and saluted, and assumed the chair for the purpose of receiving the G.M. and
officers of G.L. M.W. Bro. Dougall was accompanied by a large representation of present and past G.L.
officers, amongst the number being R.W. Bros. Powley, Wetherilt, McLean, and Kearsley, P.D.G.M. ; R.W.
Bro. Allen, P.Prov.G.M. ; R.W. Bro. Catchpole, S.G.W.; R.W. Bro. Rhodes, P.G.W. After being welcomed and
saluted, the G.M. assumed the chair for the purpose of conducting the ceremony of installation. The D. of C.
announced the re-election of R.W. Bro. George Barclay as W.M. of the Lodge, and the Installing Master then
directed W. Bro. C. J. Schnauer (W.M., Lodge Ara, No. 348, I.C.), W. Bro. W. Coltman (W.M., Albion, No.
45), W. Bro. W. P. Endean (W.M., Ara Lodge, No. 1), and W. Bro. W. J. Arnold (Lodge Auckland, No. 87) to
withdraw for the purpose of introducing the W.M.-elect. R.W. Bro. Barclay was announced by the D. of C.,
received and presented by the Installing Master, by whom he was duly placed in the chair. The following
officers were then invested :—S.W., W. Bro. D. B. Wallace; J.W., W. Bro. M. Copeland; Sec., V.W. Bro. G.
A. Gribbin; Treas., V.W. Bro. E. R. Piggott; D. of C., W. Bro, M. Blair; Organist, W. Bro. A. C. Harrison;
S.D., W. Bro. J. Morran ; J.D., W. Bro. T. Leighton; I.G., W. Bro. T. A. Foweraker ; S.S., W. Bro. J. C.
Spinley; J.S., W. Bro. H. Willis. An interesting address upon the Masonic education of our brethren was
delivered by the W.M. The G.M. addressed those present. His remarks, which were eloquent and inspiring,
were listened to attentively by all the brethren. At the termination of the meeting the brethren were
entertained in the lower hall. The toasts honoured were those of the M.W.G.M. and the W.M. An attractive
musical programme was provided.
———————
THE THREE DEGREES.
———<>———
A few years ago a very vigorous controversy took place in the Quatuor Coronati Lodge, in which the eminent
authorities of that Lodge were ranged on opposite sides. The questions involved related to the history of the
three degrees of pure and ancient Freemasonry. When I say that such well-known authorities as the late Bro.
Hughan and Bro. Gould, the historian, took diametrically opposite views, it will be seen that the contest was
one of intellectual giants. Several lengthy papers were read, and on each a long and interesting discussion
took place.
There were two main questions discussed—one, whether before the era of G.Ls., namely, the year 1717, there
were any degrees at all (i.e., whether there was only one ceremony), the other whether at the time of the
publication of the first edition of the Constitutions in 1723 there was in existence and recognised three
degrees of Freemasonry.
The first important paper was read by Bro. Hughan (A.Q.C., x., 127), and he put forward the following
views. In the first place, he held that there were no degrees of Freemasonry before the G.L. era; that there
was only one esoteric ceremony on the admission or making of Masons. He was careful to define what he
meant by a degree. He did not deny that there were at any rate in early times different grades of Masons; but
he stipulated that to constitute a higher degree there must be an esoteric or secret ceremony, at which
Freemasons of a lower grade were not permitted to be present. He held that no evidence of such a ceremony
existed, and that what evidence existed was against it. No minutes of English Lodges exist before 1700. The
evidence as to the practice of English Lodges is therefore very meagre. The old manuscript Charges or
Constitutions—from the ancient Regius or Halliwell manuscript in the British Museum—contain no
reference to degrees. Elias Ashmole's entry in his diary in 1646 simply states that he was made a Freemason,
and the entry in 1682 records his presence at Masons' Hall, London, when six gentlemen "were admitted into
the fellowship of Freemasons," and he refers to them as "the new accepted Masons," and terms himself "the
senior Fellow " among those present. The other few references to Freemasonry in the seventeenth century
contain no suggestion of degrees. Bro. Hughan referred also to the minutes of two Lodges in the eighteenth
century prior to 1717, and can find no reference in them to degrees. He held that these facts showed that
there was but one esoteric ceremony before 1717, and that there were no higher secrets than those
communicated to the initiate. He did not discuss the nature of the esoteric ceremony, but he was plainly of
opinion that the whole contents of our Third Degree at least were the creation of a period subsequent to 1717.
On the other question Bro. Hughan was equally positive. He held that although in 1717 there were no
degrees in Freemasonry, in 1723, when the first Book of Constitutions was issued, the three degrees were
known and practised; but he considered that the Third Degree, being then quite new, was little thought of,
and was by no means considered an essential for the holding of high Masonic rank. He mainly relied on the
Book of Constitutions itself. Referring to G.L. it was enacted :— " Apprentices must be admitted Masters and
F.C. only here unless by dispensation."
There is no doubt that this looks like a plain reference to three degrees. The Constitutions, however, contain
no other reference to Masters, save where referring to a Master of a Lodge ; and the requirement of
candidates for office, including that of even G.M. itself, was merely that the brother must be a F.C.
Both the contentions above set out were strongly contested by other eminent brethren. The main assault was
made by the late Bro. Speth, the Sec. of the Lodge, who read a remarkable paper in the following year
(A.Q.C., xi., 47).
Bro. Speth argued that from the earliest records of Operative Freemasonry there were two degrees—that is,
two sets of secrets, the one communicated to the Apprentice, the other communicated to him after he had
served his apprenticeship and was admitted a Master of the Craft. His arguments were based first on
probability. The old manuscript Constitutions showed a ceremony and secrets communicated to the
Apprentice at the time of his acceptance or initiation, and he contended that there must have been additional
methods of recognition communicated to the finished Craftsman. The Freemason moving from place to place
would be entrusted with secrets, signs, etc., which would enable him to easily prove his competency to any
Master of work to whom he should apply for employment. This is supported by expressions in the old
Constitutions which it was urged indicate his sets of secrets which are to be kept.
Bro. Speth considered that the apparently single ceremony given in the seventeenth century to speculatives
indicated that the two degrees were in such cases given together, as there was no reason for distinguishing
the Apprentice. He also held that at the time of forming the first G.L., and for some years afterwards, two
degrees — and only two degrees — were conferred, namely, the Apprentice's and Master's, otherwise called
the F.C., and in particular it is contended that the reference in the Constitutions of 1723 is to two degrees
only. The statement that Apprentices must be admitted "Masters and F.C." only in G.L. refers only to the
conferring of one degree. They were admitted Masters, and such admittance constituted them F.C. This is
strongly borne out by the fact that the G.L. minute of a resolution passed on 27th November, 1725, altering
the above rule merely allowed ordinary Lodges to make "Masters" at discretion and contained no reference
to Fellows. It is true that Anderson in his Constitution of 1738 (thirteen years afterwards), in referring to this
resolution, mentions both Masters and Fellows, but this cannot be taken as against a minute made at the time.
It was also held by Bro. Speth that the Master's or Second Degree as it existed from early times was in
essentials the Master's Degree of later times, and that the Apprentice Degree was subsequently split into two
degrees, which were denominated the E.A. and the P.C.
The views put forward by Bro. Speth were supported by Bro. Gould, and some few Years later—in 1903—
the latter put his views forward in a paper entitled "The Degrees of Pure and Ancient Freemasonry." (A.Q.C.,
xvi., 28.)
It is, of course, impossible for me to give all the arguments adduced in this controversy, but there are some
special points of interest which I wish to put before brethren.
It is plain that there are special difficulties in any investigation of the probable contents of ancient esoteric or
secret ceremonies. It seems to me to be especially hazardous to dogmatise upon the basis: that no mention is
made of degrees in minutes or contemporary writings. Ashmole does not purport to give the slightest
indication of the method of his making, and there is certainly nothing to show that he did not on one day
receive two degrees. Similarly, as it was the practice to write out the old Constitutions, all secret parts of the
ritual are naturally omitted; and any reference to there being two degrees may have been considered quite
improper. I think, therefore, that the negative evidence shows nothing at all one way or the other.
lf, however, it can be shown that there were two degrees at the very earliest period of the G.L., and especially
if it can be shown that there were two degrees shortly prior to the foundation of the G.L., then there appears
to be a strong probability that two degrees existed far back in the early period of Operative Masonry ; for it is
difficult to believe that without any central organisation and with separate Lodges, each with an independent
existence, a new degree should have been added.
There is evidence of a striking character in this direction, and the most important fact has been discovered
since the above-mentioned papers were published. It is noticeable that the earliest records which we have of
G.L., namely, 1723, proceed on the basis of a well established system of two degrees. There is absolutely no
evidence whatever of anything new in Masonry being introduced between 1717 and 1723, but it is true that
we have no evidence of any kind of the doings of G.L. or private Lodges during this period.
I must now refer to the Scottish minutes, which brethren know, of course, go back to the beginning of the
seventeenth century, more than a hundred years before the constitution of the Scottish G.L. The Lodges
whose minutes have thus been preserved were purely operative Lodges, and the minutes give little
information. They show a degree conferred upon the Apprentice, and refer to the communication of the
"Mason's word and all that appertained thereto "—an expression which is decidedly cryptic and suggestive.
The Schaw Statutes of 1598, which were formulated to govern the Lodges throughout Scotland, prescribed
that at the making of Masters two Apprentices must be present. This has been generally held to show that at
the "making of Masters" in Scotland no degree could have been conferred, and it has been assumed,
therefore, that in Scotland one degree only was conferred prior to the G.L. period.
There is, however, in existence the minute-book of a Lodge that met in a small hamlet called Haughfoote, in
Midlothian, and the first entry, evidently of a ritualistic character, dated 22nd December, 1702, is most
important. The first part of the entry is missing, a page having been torn out, probably by a careful brother
who considered that it disclosed too much. As it exists the passage is as follows, commencing in the middle
of a sentence :— " . . . . of entrie as the Apprentice did leaving out (the Common judge). Then they
whisper the word as before, and the M.M. grips his hand after the ordinary way."
Bro. Speth pointed out that this was part of a ritualistic instruction, probably for passing a Fellow, and that it
rendered probable the existence of a Second Degree in one part of Scotland in 1702.
Since Bro. Speth's time, however, a very important discovery has been made. A manuscript has been found
and acquired by the G.L. of Ireland, and has been called by the late Bro. Hughan the Chetwoode Crawley
M.S. It was found in a volume included in a lot purchased from a second-hand collector, and is considered by
Bro. Hughan to have been written by a brother to assist his memory. It is entitled " The Grand Secret, or the
Form of Giving the Mason Word." It is undated, but the experts place it by the writing at 1730, or a little
earlier. It distinctly describes two separate degrees, in the higher of which the Apprentices are excluded, but
the chief interest lies in the fact that it contains the same words as in the incomplete entry in the Haughfoote
minute-book, and plainly gives the rest of the incomplete sentence. It shows without any possibility of doubt
in my opinion that the Haughfoote entry is a description of the ceremony of making a Master—in fact, a
higher or Second Degree. (See A.Q.C., xxvi., 16.)
If this is correct, then two degrees were in existence in 1702, and Bro. Gould's and Bro. Speth's contention is
that there were two degrees, the Apprentice and Master or P.C., before the G.L. era is confirmed.
It is true that Bro. Hughan, who as I have pointed out held the opposite view, and who described the
Chetwode Crawley M.S. in 1904 (A.Q.C. xvii., 91), seemed still unconvinced, and in particular distinguished
the Haughfoote entry because throughout that minute-book there was no word of the exclusion of
Apprentices. But I think, notwithstanding the authority of such an accomplished Masonic antiquarian, that
the fact he points out shows merely that such matters were not inserted in ordinary Lodge minutes. In fact it
seems to me to throw a new light on all the Scotch minutes.
Brethren may ask : Of what importance is it whether there was only one degree or two degrees at or
immediately before the G.L. era? The answer is that upon the determination of that point depends the
antiquity of some of our most cherished institutions. There is a large amount of evidence which goes to show
that the essentials of our first two degrees were originally contained in the Apprentice Degree. If that is
correct, and there were two degrees prior to the G.L. era, and therefore inferentially for a very lengthy period
before that time, then we are justified in assuming that all the essential features of our present Third Degree
are not the creation of innovators less than two hundred years ago, but go back to the early beginnings of the
Craft. There are almost insuperable difficulties in showing what the esoteric ceremonies at a certain period
consisted of, but there are certain indications coupled with the above considerations which go to show the
antiquity of the most important points in our ritual.
An uncertain point is as to the actual time when the two degrees were split into three by breaking up the
Apprentice Degree into two parts. It was certainly before 1738, and probably about 1730 or slightly earlier.
Reference was then made to the spurious initials published in the eighteenth century, and the following
references were given : Gould's History, Appendix ; A.Q.C., xxvi, 17; A.Q.C., xvi, 36; A.Q.C., xxv, 350, 366;
A.Q.C., xi, 59.
———————
INSTITUTION OF A NEW LODGE.
———<>———
Lodge Takapuna, No. 202 on the roll of the G.L. of New Zealand, was ushered into being on the 23rd
November, under very promising auspices. Starting with about forty members, including several P.Ms., with
an enthusiastic P.M. of an E.C. Lodge as its first W.M., and with one of the most prosperous suburbs of
Auckland as its location, the Lodge has every prospect of a successful career. Its meeting place for the
present is the new Foresters' Hall of the district, but a site in the centre of Takapuna township is under offer
from one of the brethren of the Lodge upon most advantageous terms, and it will be the endeavour of the
promoters of Lodge Takapuna to secure the property and build a hall upon it at an early date. in the meantime
the latest Masonic infant is well endowed by its sponsors, a large portion of its equipment having been
donated by members and officers, and by outside brethren—a handsome compass and square, for example,
being provided by Lodge Onewa, another recently established Lodge in the neighbouring town of Northcote.
The inaugural ceremonies were attended by a large gathering of members of the Craft from Auckland,
Devonport, Northcote, and elsewhere, to the number of about 300. M.W. Bro. Dougall, G.M., conducted the
proceedings of constitution and dedication, being attended by the S.G.W. (R.W. Bro. Catehpole), and by W.
Bro. S. S. Allen, S.G.D. The chair of J.W. was filled during this portion of the evening by R.W. Bro. G.
Barclay, P.G.W. Other distinguished officers who assisted in the proceedings were M.W. Bro. O. Nicholson,
P.Prov.G.M., and now Prov.G.M. of Auckland, R.W. Bro. G. Powley, P.D.G.M., R.W. Bro. F. Kearsley,
P.D.G.M., and V.W. Bro. E. J. McFarland, who acted as G. Chaplain in the course of the consecration rites.
Lodge Takapuna having. been duly constituted with the usual symbolical use of corn, wine, salt, and oil, and
the members of the new Lodge having rendered homage to the G.M., an address on "The Nature and Objects
of Freemasonry " was delivered by M.W. Bro. Dougall, and the Lodge was called off for a short interval. On
the Lodge being again called on, the installation of the Master-elect was proceeded with. The M.W.G.M.
transferred the control of the meeting to M.W. Bro. Nicholson, by whom W. Bro. Herbert George Stringer
was duly installed as W.M. W. Bros. H. J. Kallender (W.M. of Lodge Onewa, No. 182) and Coltman (W.M.
of Lodge Albion, No. 45) acted as presenting officers. The tools of the three degrees were presented by W.
Bro. F. E. F. Weir (W.M. of Lodge Remuera, 1710, E.C.), W. Bro. A. C. H. Scott (W.M. of Lodge Ponsonby,
708, E.C.), and W. Bro. W. R. Leighton (W.M. of Lodge Waitakerei, 170). The W.M. invested his own
officers, as under :— D.M., W. Bro. David Lusby, P.M.; S.W., Bro. William Blomfield; J.W., Bro. Rev. G. A.
J. Macdonald; Treas., Bro. A. E. Warnock; Sec. W. Bro. Fred. B. Woodhead, P.M.; D. of C., Bro. H. Brittain
Bull; Chaplain, Bro. R. Graham; S.D., Bro. A. E. Kusabs; J.D., Bro. E. W. Alison, junr. ; I.G., Bro. F. A.
McDonald; Organist, Bro. Swain; S.S., Bro. A. Hector Pierce; J.S., Bro. H. Steere; Assistant Stewards, Bros.
R. S. Thompson and G. Mills; Tyler, Bro. W. Inch.
An interesting feature of the gathering was the presence of R.W. Bro. A. S. Bankart, of the E.C., and the
officers of D.G.L., under which the W.M. of Lodge Takapuna had served his previous term of Mastership.
The collection taken up in aid of the W. and O. and A.M. Fund realised £11 8s.
———————
OPENING OF NEW MASONIC HALL AT HENDERSON.
———<>———
There was a large assemblage of Freemasons at Henderson on 18th November, in response to the invitation
sent out by the W.M. and brethren of Lodge Waitakerei, No. 170, to witness the formal opening of the hall
which the brethren have just erected as their Masonic home. All the Lodges in Auckland and surrounding
districts were well represented, and the Prov.G.M. (M.W. Bro. Nicholson) attended with a large
representation of the officers of G.L.
The formal part of the proceedings occupied only a few minutes. The W.M. asked the Prov.G.M. to declare
the hall open for Masonic purposes. The G.D. of C. presented W. Bro. H. L. Wade, W.M. of Maungawhao,
No. 168 (the architect for the building), who presented the W.Ts. which had been used in connection with the
erection of the structure. The Prov.G.M. declared the hall duly open, and at the same time congratulated the
brethren of the Lodge on their enterprise in having become the possessors of such handsome premises.
One great feature of the evening's proceedings was, however, the working of the ceremony of the Third
Degree, which it had been previously announced would be performed by the Prov. G.M., assisted by a team
of G.L. officers. Accordingly M.W. Bro. Nicholson assumed the chair, after which the following brethren
were conducted to their several stations :—R.W. Bro. J. Catchpole as I.P.M.; R.W. Bro. G. Barclay, P.S.G.M.,
as S.W.; R.W. Bro.. F. Kearsley, P.D.G.M., as J.W. ; R.W. Bro. G. H. Powley, P.D.G.M., as Chaplain; W. Bro.
Howie Walker, P.G.D. of C., as S.D.; W. Bro. C. Page, P.G.D.C., as J.D.; and W. Bro. Ferneyhough as I.G.
The ceremony was excellently and impressively carried out.
The brethren of Lodge Waitakerei subsequently entertained the visitors, and the approach of train time
brought to a close all too soon, in the opinion of many, a most enjoyable function.
———————
THE REAL AND THE IDEAL.
———<>———
Here is a tale in two parts, suitable for telling in the Authors' Lodge :—Part I.—Side remarks by
Distinguished Author while composing an epoch-making novel : (a) ."For heavens sake, Mary ! Can't you
stop that child crying without singing at the top of your voice? How is a man to get anywhere with all that
noise going on ?" (b) "Yes, yes, yes ; take the paste, take the shears, take the paper, take the envelopes, take
the stamps, take the matches, take anything, but let me work in peace !" (c) "Oh, if you say so, I suppose we
must pay this idiotic return visit, but I do wish you'd remember that every minute taken out of my working
day cuts down our incomes by just so much !" Part II.—From the Dedication Page of the completed epoch-
making Novel : "To My Wife, Mary, without whose gentle inspiration, true companionship, and constant
helpfulness, these pages would never have been written, I gratefully inscribe this book."—"Square and
Compass."
———————
BRO. THE REV. J. T. LAWRENCE, M.A., P.A.G. CHAPLAIN.
———<>———
It is with the deepest regret that we place on record the death of Bro. Rev. John Thomas Lawrence, M.A.,
Past Asst. G. Chaplain, which took place at Accrington on the 7th October, after a few weeks' illness and a
very serious operation. The end came very suddenly, although it was known that he could not last very long.
He was one of those exceptional brethren of whom it can truly be said that in Freemasonry, as in other walks
of life, though being dead his works do follow him, and it is in the literary fields of Freemasonry that his
name will continue for very many years to hold a premier position as an intelligent teacher and guide. His
death is a distinct loss to Freemasonry—not to the English Craft alone, but to the entire Masonic world.
Bro. Lawrence was so well known at Home and abroad, by reason of his voluminous writings and instructive
lectures and addresses, that it seems impossible for one to express in mere words how great a hold he had on
the sympathetic affections of the Craft. All who became acquainted with him realised that he was one who
was not content with being a passive Mason. He saw in Freemasonry a great moral lever, and though he did
not go so far as some and admit that Freemsonry was a religion, he saw a channel of communication between
religion and Freemasonry which he greatly admired, and used his time and talents to keep that channel pure
and sweet. So much so that in his church work he could infuse many of the best aspects of Masonry, and in
his Masonic work brought to bear all the qualities of a truly Christian gentleman, void of offence, but always
ready to minister and serve where good could be accomplished. In this way he spiritualised Masonry without
ever trenching upon the forbidden grounds of religion, and he developed Masonic powers without infringing
upon politics. In fact, he was ever one of the first to vigorously resent any such attempts on the part of others.
As vicar of the very large and important parish of St. Peter's, Accrington, he disclosed the same breadth of
sympathy and feeling; consequently his influence was wider and greater than could otherwise have been the
case. He was immensely popular amongst his people, whose chief opinion was summed up in the
expressions that he was " Not a one-sided parson," and " A thoroughly good all-round sort of chap." The
secret lay in his ability to adapt himself to circumstances, to make the best possible use of every opportunity,
and to maintain an unflinching stand on principles and landmarks which had been well thought out.
Bro. Lawrence was born at Leeds on 24th March, 1859, and was therefore in his fifty-sixth year. He was
educated at Malvern College, whence he obtained an open methematical scholarship at Merton College,
Oxford, and graduated Master of Arts in 1886, having in the meantime been ordained by the Bishop of
Oxford. For two years he served as curate at the parish of Stoke Newington, and then took up an appointment
in India as secretary of the Society for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge, and chaplain of the Military
Orphanage in Madras.
During his residence in Madras he was initiated in the Pitt Macdonald Lodge, No. 1198, in 1889; joined the
Universal Charity Lodge, No. 273, Madras, and was installed Master in 1893. In 1897 he was invested as
D.G.W. of Madras. On his return to England he became a joining member of the Anchor and Hope Lodge,
No. 37, Bolton, and the Abbey Lodge, No. 2529, Whalley. In 1902 he was invested as Prov.G. Chaplain of
East Lancashire, and in 1910 was appointed Asst.G. Chaplain of England.
As an R.A. Mason he was exalted in the Pitt Macdonald Chapter, No. 1198, Madras, in 1891, and installed
1st Prin. in 1896. In the following year he was invested as D.G.Soj. of Madras.
In the Mark Mason's Degree he was advanced in the Macdonald Ritchie Lodge, No. 160, Madras, in 1892,
installed Master in 1895, and appointed D.G.W. of Madras in 1896 and 1897.
He was installed a Knight Templar and Knight of Malta in the St. John of Jerusalem and Malta Preceptory,
No. 73, Madras, in 1894; was installed Preceptor and Prior in 1898, and invested Prov. Vice-Chancellor of
Madras in the same year. In the Order of the Secret Monitor he was inducted in the Damon and Pythias
Conclave, No. 14, Madras, in 1891.
BRO. THE REV. J. T. LAWRENCE. M.A., P.A.G. CHAPLAIN.
As a writer and author he was popularly known wherever Masonic works and journals circulate. His chief
aim was to make the symbolic teachings of Freemasonry and all the concordant Orders an up-to-date ethical
force. In this phase of Masonic authorship he stood alone. The vital, living present was his vineyard of toil.
He completely ignored the mystery of the past, its history, and its antiquities. To sow the fields of the present
with the most acceptable seed, and to wait for the result, was as essentially a part of his Masonic life as it
was his chief concern in his religious life. He imbued the so-called dead symbols of the Craft with a living
and ever-present spirituality, and gave them interpretations which appealed to every class of mind, and thus
made his lessons universally acceptable. As a lecturer on similar lines his services were in frequent demand.
These demands were acceded to so far as they did not interfere with his parish duties, and his services were
generously accorded to the Lodges and associations which make the study of Masonic subjects a part of their
work.
Bro. Lawrence's first work for Freemasonry as a writer was as editor of the " Indian Masonic Review," the
duties of which office he fulfilled from 1895 until 1899. Since that period he has been a frequent contributor
to " The Freemason," and few, if any, know better than we how generally welcome his contributions were to
brethren in all parts of the world. He rendered similar service to the "Masonic Illustrated " prior to its being
incorporated with " The Freemason." Among his published works are Masonic Jurisprudence and
Symbolism, as Interpreted by Grand Lodge Decisions." This contained an introduction by Bro. Canon
Horsley, P.G. Chaplain, and was published in 1908. Four years later a second edition was called for, but in the
meantime so much new matter had been prepared that the references to the symbolism of the Craft were
omitted, and the title altered accordingly. The decisions referred to in the new edition covered a lapse of time
from the formation of the United G.L. down to the time of publication. The subject of symbolism dropped
out of this second edition opened a way for a series of volumes on the subject, and in succession there came
from his pen " Sidelights on Freemasonry," " By-ways of Freemasonry," The Perfect Ashlar," and " The
Keystone."
He also wrote or edited a series of eight Masonic Directories, or handbooks of practical directions for
officers in the Craft, B.A., and Mark Degrees, comprising :—" The Deacons' Work," The Wardens' Work,"
"The Secretary's and Treasurer's Work," " The Worshipful Master's Work," The Mark Work," "The Royal
Arch Work," " The Chaplain's and the Organist's Work," and " The Work of the Director of Ceremonies, the
Tyler, the Almoner, the Charity Representative, the Stewards." Among his non-Masonic productions are :—
"The Directory of Musical Biography," "The Parish of Accrington," "The Church Organ," and three brief
Indian Histories, each of which was published in six languages.—" The Freemason."
———————
A REMARKABLE INITIATION.
———<>———
(By BRO. DR. JOSIAH WILLIAMS, F.R.G.S.)
A few months before the trouble in the Soudan commenced I accompanied a private expedition, our object
being sport and exploration through the Soudan. We travelled through the country of the powerful Beni Amir
tribe, the hitherto unexplored country of the Kunama or Base people, to the border of Abyssinia, where we
experienced a check and some hairbreadth escapes by reason of the warlike attitude of the Deurbelas, a wild
and lawless border tribe, who attacked us with spears, killing one of our men. This caused us to retreat again
into the Base country, and retrace our steps to the Beni Amir tribe. Thence we wandered on to the country of
the Hamrans, or sword-hunters, and pitched our little camp by the side of a beautiful river called the Tacazze,
or Settite, where, from time to time, we issued forth in quest of the lordly lion, the ferocious buffalo, and
other wild animals. After a fortnight's encamping there we made our way to Massowah, and started by a
Rubattino steamer for civilisation. However, I will only touch lightly on our travels so far as Kassala, the
scene of my initiation into the ancient rites of Freemasonry.
At Cairo our party was made up to ten, including three white servants and one black. About the end of
November off we went to that most uninteresting port, Suez, where we were compelled to remain for a whole
week because of a block in the Suez Canal. At the end of that time we were fortunate to obtain a British India
steamer, which, after a three days' voyage, landed us at Suakim, in the Soudan. Here about three days were
spent in sorting our boxes and in engaging about sixty camels to transport us across nearly three hundred
miles of desert to Kassala. After a good deal of shouting and wrangling and roaring of the camels which
accompanies such preparations, our caravan made a start to cross the desert. In consequence of illness in
camp, we were three weeks in accomplishing the journey. Arrived at Kassala, our camp was pitched on the
edge of the sandy river-bed of the Gash, about a quarter of a mile outside of the town, in a delightful spot
under tall waving palms, lemon tamarisk, and tamarind trees. About a quarter of a mile behind us was the
curious-looking town of Kassala, surrounded by a wall (loop-holed) composed of mud bricks baked in the
sun—which, by the way, baked us pretty well also. We spent about a week at Kassala, engaging camels to
take us on to the Beni Amir tribe.
Two or three days after our arrival, one Demetrius Masconas, a Greek, who was then employed by the
Egyptian Government in sinking wells, requested me to visit his son in the town, as he was very ill. We
struck up a friendly acquaintance during our stay, and this led to frequent conversations on the state of the
country, on slavery, and so on. That slavery did exist I had ocular evidence. Amongst other subjects, the
subject of Freemasonry cropped up. He remarked that two of my party were Masons. I told him that it had
been my intention long ago to enter a Lodge, and that effect would be given to it on my return to England. To
this he replied, " Why not now I can initiate you to-morrow, as I am a Master in the Thirty-third Degree." He
belonged to the Lodge Pythagoras of Alexandra, as also to Greek and Italian Lodges. It did seem strange that
Masonry should be found represented right in the heart of the Soudan, amongst a lot of uncivilised
Soudanese. There was no, regular Lodge there, or indeed a Lodge of any kind, and I know now that the
whole thing was most improper and irregular. Nevertheless, I can say that to my lot fell the distinction of
being the only one ever initiated into the mystic rites of Freemasonry in Kassala.
On arranging to visit the Greek on the following day, he certainly did say : "There is no Lodge here, and,
under ordinary circumstances, I would not initiate you, but as the circumstances are peculiar, and as you are
very likely to encounter dangers of various kinds, it might so happen that Freemasonry might save your life
even in the Soudan." I thanked the worthy Greek, and we parted, he ardently invoking T.G.A.O.T.U. to
shower down blessings on my head for services rendered to his son. "What should I have done," he
exclaimed, "had you not arrived here? My son is very ill, and there are no medicines here to give him; he
must have died. The good God has sent you, and I am most thankful."
The following day found me paying a visit to the Greek in Kassala. He greeted me most cordially, and at
once conducted me to his sitting-room, where the ceremony of initiation was proceeded with in the most
solemn manner. Daylight was excluded, but the room was illuminated by several wax candles. On a table at
one end of the room lay an open Bible with the requisite accessories. As the W.M. and myself were the only
two persons in the room, those who are in the know will readily understand that many of the little formalities
which always take place in a properly constituted Lodge were obliged to be omitted, the W.M. contenting
himself by explaining that "In a regular Lodge so-and-so takes place." The ritual, as I since know, was gone
through in an excellent manner. In due time all was over, and the next day the W.M. presented me with a
provisional certificate, written in abbreviated French and stamped at the corner. The stamp bore the
impression of the Pyramids, and the words "Lodge Pythagoras." The W.M. desired me to call at the Lodge in
Alexandria on my return, but I did not do so, as my time there was very limited.
On my return to camp I was not long in seeking my two brother Masons, and communicating to them the
secrets which I had just learned, doubtless to their very great surprise. It was very amusing to see the
astonishment depicted on their countenances, as they knew perfectly well that I was not Masonic when I left
Cairo. There was A., seated on the shady side of the tent reading a book. On looking up he discovered me
making mystic signs. These he pretended to ignore, and exclaimed, "What's the matter, doctor ? Are you not
well?" My reply was : "Permit me to grasp you by the hand." This conveyed some information. He then
called out to his friend C. : Come here; let us question this doctor and examine him thoroughly." C. appeared,
and said, "Let us away to the interior of the tent." Although my examination was satisfactory, they both
thought that the W.M. had initiated me in a most improper and irregular manner.
When, some months afterwards, I returned to England and made application to join a Lodge, my certificate
excited much curiosity. It was sent by the W.M. to G.L., with its history. The officers of G.L., on returning the
certificate, stated that there could be no doubt that I had been initiated under very peculiar circumstances and
in a very irregular manner, and suggested that it would be advisable for me again to go through the whole
impressive ceremony, when my Mother Lodge would be in the town where I resided. This was accordingly
done.
The foregoing is an illustration of how Masonry is spread over the whole surface of the inhabited globe.—
"The Freemason."
———————
SUBSCRIPTIONS ACKNOWLEDGED TO 19th DECEMBER, 1914.
———<>———
J. W. Coleman 17/6, D. Hyaniason 20/-, Capt. Hood 31/8, F. C. Knight 45/-, H. A. Mariner 18/4, F. H.
Muellar, O. Nicholson 15/-, S. H. Pagni 15/-, G. Reid 20/-, P. M. Thomson 20/-, J. Wiseman 27/6, J. Endean
20/-, J. Reid, D. E. Fraser, H. G. Stringer, R. Gardner, W. S. Cooper, N. Williams, F. Wilson Smith, H. L. and
N. Wade, F. R. Trevithick, W. J. Stemson, H. N. Garland, J. W. Probert, S. Whyte, C. W. Page 20/-, G. W.
Ravenhill 20/- (Auckland), L. J. Thompson (Hunterville), G. T. Allen (Sumner), W. Storah (Waipukurau), J.
Morley (Wellington S.), C. O. Knight 23/6, F. Bird 26/-, W. A. Fendall 6/10, J. E. Holmes, D. W. Jack 15/-,
A. McLeod 2/6, F. W. Fothill, S. Warner 20/-, A. E. Furness, N. C. McKenzie, D. Windust, D. A. McLean, D.
J. Lamare, E. G. Burt (Whangarei), H. Tanner 50/- (Epsom), C. Silvester, R. H. Wilson, A. Wilby, S. Martin,
A. B. Charters 40/- (Wellington), H. C. Blundell (Kawakawa), A. H. Crook, B. Gee 20/- (Invercargill), W. J.
White, J. Whalley (Palmerston North), R. A. Andrews 20/-, C. E. Beachem 30/-, G. E. Buckland 20/-, R. R.
Gregg 20/-, J. Jackman 19/2, C. Speight 20/-, H. Tristram 20/-, E. A. Tisch 15/10, J. W. Warren 10/-, R. H.
Webb, G. Primrose, R. English, A. K. Wrigley, H. B. Jenkins, W. M. Cann, H. N. Forsythe, J. Varney
(Hamilton), J. E. Herbert 19/2 (Frankton), W. Mullar 20/-, F. Potts 20/-, Dr. E. E. Roberts 30/-, P. Holmes, S.
H. Boyce, J. F. Brookes, J. A. Bryce, J. T. Douce, F. C. Thomason, Colonel T. Jowsey, J. H. Hammond, G. W.
Ollard (Cambridge), M. Forbes (Wanganui), J. T. Henderson (Christchurch), F. H. Newton 22/6 (Nightcaps),
W. Pasco (Waipawa), A. D. Woodward (Westport).
(All 7/6 except those noted.)
OBITUARY.'
———<>———
W. BRO. J. P. COX, AETAT 82.
———
At his residence, Fitzherbert Street, Featherston, James G. Cox, aged 82 years. Thus the last
notice is given to the world of one who, though little known outside the district of the
Wairarapa, has worthily played his part on the minor stage of life and has earned eternal rest.
Fifty or more years ago Mr. Cox was known in Wellington as a storekeeper on what was then
known as "The Beach," but is now Lambton Quay. On the one side a row of small shops of
primitive architecture, and on the other the murmuring of the silvery waves on the sea-girt
shore. The town life of the period evidently did not appeal to Mr. Cox, as he soon outspanned
for the Wairarapa, bringing up at the small hamlet of Featherston, where he has since resided,
engaged in different pursuits. He took an active part in all local movements, and for many years
was regarded as the perpetual chairman of the Town Board.
He joined Freemasonry in the late seventies, by initiation into the Greytown Lodge, No. 1720,
E.C. In 1880 he was one of the founders of Lodge St. John, Featherston, and subsequently
became W.M., and remained attached to it until his death. He was also a member of the
Wairarapa R.A. Chapter, and therein passed through the principal chairs. He was the Grand
Representative of the G. Chapter of Oregon in New Zealand. While Lodge St. John was attached
to the E.C. he attained to the rank of D.S.G.W., but did not hold office under the G.L. of New
Zealand. He was held in the highest esteem not only by his brethren, but throughout the
Wairarapa. His remains were conveyed to their last resting place in the Featherston Cemetery on
Sunday, 6th December.
———————
FREEMASONRY'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE WAR.
———<>———
Bro. the Marquess of Lincolnshire, K.G., G.C.M.G., P.Prov. G.M. of Buckinghamshire and a P.D.G.M. of New
South Wales, although over seventy years of age, has been enrolled as a special constable at High Wycombe
(Eng.)
The Lord Mayor of London, Sir T. Vansittart Bowater, J.G.W. of England, is honorary colonel of the 1st
Brigade of the London Rifle Brigade. His second son holds a commission in the Westminster Dragoons
(Yeomanry), and his third son is a lieutenant of the City of London Fusiliers. His brother, Major Frank
Bowater, is with his two nephews in camp at Mares-field. Truly, the Bowater family is well represented with
the colours.
The war has made havoc with many of the Masonic Lodges, especially among those whose members belong
to the naval and military forces of the country. In fact, some of the Lodges, notably the Lord Charles
Beresford, No. 2404, the Per Mare per Terram, No. 3609, the Engineer, No. 2599, the Army and Navy, No.
2738, are stated to have suspended their meetings altogether, as all the members have proceeded to the seat
of war. Hence it happens that Bro. Orlton Cooper, P.M., P.Z.L.R., finds himself in his seventieth year
constrained, by force of circumstances, to become Master for the second time, having been elected to the
Royal Crown Lodge, No. 3133, which is composed of naval and military officers. The Lodge has sent
subscriptions to the Prince of Wales's National Fund, and also to the League of Mercy.
———————
PETITION FOR SUBDIVISION OF THE WELLINGTON DISTRICT.
———<>———
A petition conveying a resolution carried in each of the fifteen Lodges referred to therein, praying fqr the
subdivision of the Wellington District by the creation of a new Masonic District, to be called " The Ruapehu
Province," bounded towards the south and east by the Manawatu River, towards south-west by the sea,
towards the north-west by the present Taranaki District, and towards the north by the Auckland District, has
been sent to the B. of G.P. The petition is signed by the W.M. and Sec. of each of the fifteen Lodges, and is
recommended by R.W. Bro. T. A. Peterkin, Prov.G.M. of Wellington District. It was resolved to recommend
G.L. to grant the prayer of the petitioners.
———————
BIOGRAPHICAL.
———<>———
W. BRO. FREDERICK CHARLES BRENCHLEY BISHOP, ACTING-G.SEC.
————
The subject of this notice first saw Masonic light in Christchurch, being initiated in Lodge St. Augustine, No.
4, on 10th
October, 1899. He was installed as W.M. 13th March, 1906; appointed G. Steward, 1908; and G.D. of C.,
1910; was one of the foundation members of the Masters and Past Masters Lodge, and was installed Master
on 4th December, 1912, and is still occupying the chair.
Bro. Bishop has taken a very active part in Capitular Freemasonry, and was exalted in St. Augustine Chapter,
No. 1, on 15th February, 1905; installed 3rd, Prin. J. in 1909; H: in 1910; Z., 11th October, 1911; W.M.M.,'
8th November, 1911; W.C.N. and M.E.C., 28th November, 1911; appointed G. Organist of Sup. G. Chapter in
1909, and G.D. of C., 1913. Aspiring to the higher degrees, our brother was perfected in Beckett Chapter, No.
135, on 26th November, 1906; installed as M.W.S., March, 1912, and served for two years in that
distinguished office.
He was appointed G. Representative of the G.L. of Kansas in 1912, and was elected Prov.G.Sec. of the
Prov.G.L. of Canterbury at its inception November, 1909.
When M.W. Bro. M. Niccol, G.Sec., was granted leave of absence in May last, Bro. Bishop was appointed
acting-G.Sec., which position he will fill until Bro. Niccol's return.
Our W. Bro., though having taken many degrees, has not yet joined the order of Benedict, and consequently,
having no family ties, is able to devote much time to the service of Freemasonry. In Canterbury he is as well
known as the Cathedral, and enjoys the esteem of all the brethren, being ever ready to take any part that may
be allotted to him, no matter how difficult it may be. Any Masonic function in that province would be
incomplete without the presence of W. Bro. F. C. B. Bishop.
———————
AMERICAN FREEMASONS IN ENGLAND.
———<>———
Under the heading of " Masons to Assist Lodge Men Home," the Cincinnati " Commercial Tribune " gives
the following news :-
Three hundred families of American Freemasons are among the stianded in London, according to a
cablegram reaching Colonel William B. Melish, P.G.M. of the Knights Templar, and coming from
Frederick C. Van Duzer, Chairman of the American Relief Committee in London. The families comprise
some 700 persons in all. Mr. Van Duzer suggested that the Masonic bodies in the United States should
arrange for sending a steamer to London to take these people back to their homes. The condition of many
of them, he adds, is deplorable, though the committee is doing all it can to assist them. Colonel Melish
immediately communicated with President Wilson, asking that the American Ambassador be requested to
give attention to the matter. In reply, a telegram was received from the President's private secretary, Mr.
Tumulty, saying the Department of State would act at once. It is expected steps will be taken to give relief
and to bring the stranded ones home.
The foregoing was the first intimation received that there were American Masons in London who were
practically in a tight corner for the time being, although it was generally known, as an item of news, that a
large number of American visitors were stranded through their itinerary being disarranged and their inability
to cash their Continental drafts. That the American residents in London were fully able to assist their
compatriots was generally undersotod, also that all appeals were being attended to at the special bureau
which had been established at the Savoy Hotel. The committee in charge of this bureau have had some
thousand of applications to deal with. In many cases parties of wealthy Americans were reduced to the
possession of merely a few shillings; some were penniless. With large funds to draw from in America, and
plenty of unnegotiable paper in their pockets, their plight was vexatious rather than disastrous.
So many of these applicants were Masons that the question naturally arose, Could nothing be done by the
English Craft? Bro. Bernard Novambere, of Chicago, who was fortunate in having sufficient gold for his
own needs, and also with plenty of time on hand before he need return to Chicago, rendered what assistance
he could, and then made application to the G.Sec. for such advice and assistance as the head of the English
Craft could render. It was not a question of grants of money so much as temporary homes pending the arrival
of funds and the loan of money for securing passages over the Atlantic. This was a condition not provided for
in the ordinary course of G.L. administration, and Bro. Novambere was referred to Bro. F. C. Van Duzer,
P.G.D., Sec. of the America Lodge, No. 3368. Fortunately, Bro. Van Duzer was acting as secretary of the
bureau at the Savoy Hotel, and at once saw that prompt action was necessary in the interest of the Craft on
both sides of the water. A special department for registering the needs of Masonic brethren was at once
formed, and placed under the care of Bro. Novambere, who, being an American Mason, was eminently
qualified to render excellent service.
How well that service has succeeded can be told in a few lines. Pending the receipt of assistance from the
United States Government, Bro. Van Duzer has financed the Masonic Registration. This has called for
somewhere about four thousand pounds, but much of this was of a nature that could not be included in the
general scheme of the bureau. It was a responsibility between Masons, and in every case where time has
permitted the assistance rendered has been redeemed.
The names of Masons and their dependents registered at the Masonic table number over seven hundred. Not
one case has been allowed to pass over unsatisfactorily. Steamer passages have been provided for 136 cases;
211 have been relieved with sums of money according to present needs; 52 have been provided with loans
for paying their passage; 67 lots of luggage have been recovered; and 326 steamship passages obtained for
those who needed the help of the bureau to secure them. Cases of serious illness was the hardest feature to
deal with. These called for special visits to nine brethren; eight ladies, and five children. Bro. General
Edward Le Vine, of Chicago, who also was fortunate in possessing a supply of gold, and was travelling the
country in his own motor, rendered considerable assistance. For visiting purposes his car was placed at the
service of the Masonic Registration, and in conveying passengers across and about London was found
exceedingly serviceable. Among the minor services rendered was the despatch of eighty cablegrams for
money to be sent to London, and seventy cablegrams to Masonic Lodges to send needed assistance to their
members. At the time of writing there are only eight cases on the list—five brethren and three ladies. They
are housed at the Savoy Hotel, and will probably leave London about the middle of the coming week. At the
same time, Bro. Novambere will return home, and, we feel assured, will carry with him the hearty good
wishes of the English Craft. To Bro. Van Duzer, whose already recognised ability as an organiser is fully
recognised in his work for Anglo-Foreign Masonry in London, both American and English Masons will
speak with no uncertain voice.—" The Freemason," London.
———————
INTERPRETATION OF A RULE.
———<>———
At the November meeting of the B. of G.P. of the G.L. of N.Z., the Acting-G.Sec. reported that he had been
asked as to the position of a member of a Lodge, who has resigned from another Lodge without being clear
on its books. After consulting the G.Reg., he had replied that the name of the brother in question would be
removed from the lists of members of both Lodges. This ruling had been questioned, and the writer asked
that the matter should be brought before the Board. The G.Reg. stated that in his opinion Rule 185 was
perfectly clear, that a member resigning his Lodge without complying with its By-laws (and the payment of
dues was one of those By-laws) shall be deprived of all Masonic privileges, and this being so he cannot
retain his membership in any Lodge. The Board unanimously endorsed the opinion of the G.Reg., and it was
resolved to minute the same, reporting it in the Proceedings as an interpretation of Rule 183.
———————
FREEMASONRY IN LUXEMBURG.
———<>———
The leading authority of the Craft in this Grand Duchy is Supreme Council (not, however, of the so-called
"Ancient an. Accepted. Scottish Rite," says Bro. Gould in his "History of Freemasonry ") which was
established in 1849. The jurisdiction is the smallest one known, and consists of a single Lodge founded in
1803, with a membership of 80.—" Freemason' Chronicle."
———————
MENE MENE TEKEL UPHARSON.
———<>———
After nearly two centuries of honoured existence as the exponent of Craft Masonry pure and undefiled, the
G.L. of Scotland has fallen from her high estate. Hitherto she had been the only one of the three Mother G.Ls.
which continued to hold that a Craft G.L. could know no other Masonry than that of St. John. England, at the
union, compromised with the high degrees by recognising the RA. as an integral part of Craft Masonry.
Ireland has long since recognised the high degrees, and Scotland alone held the primitive faith. Traitors have
of late been taken into her councils, and for some time we have seen the shadow of the writing on the wall.
Now she has filled the cup of her iniquity. She has become the tool of the clique, and is now busy expelling
all who will not bow the knee to Baal. She has been weighed in the balance and found wanting, and the result
has been in Scotland, as elsewhere where the tail has tried to wag the dog, where the high degrees have tried
to run the Craft Lodge. A new G.L. has been founded, or, rather, the Scottish brethren who refuse to submit to
foreign dictation have declared that, as the G.L. has ceased to be a three-step body, it has ceased to be the
G.L. of Craft Masonry. And they at once proceeded to reorganise the original G.L.— the true successor of
that one founded on St. Andrew's Day, 1736. We have been favoured with copies of the Proclamation sent to
all Lodges holding Scottish Charters and to the G.Ls. of the world, in which the " National Symbolic G.L. of
Scotland of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons " sets forth its position, and as we believe it will prove
interesting reading to our brethren, we reproduce it.
PROCLAMATION.
" Unto all Free and Accepted Masons, and especially to those holding Scottish authority. Greeting.
" R. W., W., and very dear Brethren : As is well known to you, the G.L. of Scotland from its inception has
been what in ancient phraseology is termed a three-step system—that is, it practised only the degrees of St.
John's Masonry, and rejected as un-Masonic all other degrees or Orders professing to be Masonic. In 1801 it
passed an edict forbidding all its Daughter Lodges practising other than these degrees, and in 1803, when a
clandestine body was established in the City of Charleston, in the United States of America (falsely claiming
to be Scottish), sent a circular to the G.L. and sought its recognition, G.L. indignantly denied its claims. To
quote from the ` History of Freemasonry,' by Alexander Laurie, G.L. declared `that such a number of degrees
could not but inspire the most profound surprise in those' professing Scottish Masonry ; that it could never
recognise such a collection, seeing that it had always preserved the Scottish Rite in the simplicity of its
primitive institution, and that it would never disarrange its system in this respect.' This position taken by the
G.L. is set forth and emphasised in the eighty-seventh section of the G.L. law (1904 edition), which declares
G.L. recognises no degree of Masonry but those of E.A., F.C. (including the Mark), and M.M.,' and is made,
if possible, more emphatic in section 229 : No clothing nor insignia purporting to be Masonic shall be worn
in G.L. or in any subordinate Lodge, excepting that appertaining to Craft Masonry, which alone is recognised
and acknowledged.'
" In taking this stand the G.L. showed wisdom, as it prevented the various high-degree systems from making
the Craft Lodge the theatre in which to fight their quarrels, and so peace and harmony, so essential for the
welfare of all institutions, and particularly this of ours, has been secured for close on three centuries.
Attempts have been made at different times to disturb this happy condition, but there has always been
sufficient loyal brethren in G. Committee and G.L. to frustrate the designs of the trouble-makers.
Unfortunately for peace, harmony, and the welfare of true Scottish Freemasonry, three years ago the disloyal
element succeeded in having a resolution adopted by G.L. extending recognition to certain high-degree
systems in Scotland and refusing recognition to others. And, strangest thing of all, the ones recognised by
G.L. are of modern origin and mostly of foreign importation, while the ones to whom recognition is refused
are the most ancient and native Scottish bodies. As a result, loyal M.Ms. are being persecuted and driven
from the Order because they prefer the ancient Scottish bodies to which they have been members for a score
of years to the modern and foreign importation. To further show the animus and un-Masonic feeling which
characterises this foreign crusade, the brethren thus persecuted are given no chance to defend themselves
according to Masonic law. The charges are not preferred against them in their Mother Lodges, where they are
known and where they would be sure of a square deal, but before a sub-committee of G. Committee, the
members of which are also members of the foreign bodies opposed to that of which the accused belong, and
who have decided the issues before the cause has been heard, the whole thing being a farce and a disgrace to
Masonry in whose name it is done.
"Without doubt, the vast majority of the brethren who voted for that un-Masonic resolution in G.L. were
either deceived as to the status of the several high-grade bodies, or were not conversant with their history.
Therefore a word explanatory may not be out of place. The bodies sought to be recognised by G.L. as
Masonic are : The Sup. G.R.A. Chapter, the Grand Priory of the Religious and Military Order of the Temple
and Malta, the Supreme Council of the A. and A. Scottish Rite, and the Royal Order of Scotland. Of these
only the first (R.A. Chapter) is a native Scottish body, although of irregular and clandestine formation,
having seceded from the regular body (the Early Grand) in 1818. This original irregularity was healed by its
union with the regular Early G.R.A. Chapter in 1895, after which it became the only Grand-body in Scotland
working the Arch of Zerrubabel. The case of the Grand Priory is different. Like the Sup.G.R.A. Chapter, it
was irregularly and clandestinely formed in 1812. It seceded from the Early Grand. Unlike the Chapter,
however, the original irregularity has never been healed, and it still remains an irregular and clandestine
organisation. During the chequered existence of this body it has changed names and constitutions at least six
times. Its organiser, Alexander Deuchar, following the footsteps of other Scottish traitors, sought for and
obtained aid from England and had his treason endorsed by the Duke of Kent, then G.M. of the English
Knights Templar. (When was England backward in encouraging Scottish traitors ?) Even with ducal
patronage the Deuchar Conclave had but a short existence; it died, but was partially revived as a non-
Masonic body, admitting indiscriminately Masons and non-Masons. After but a short period this body also
died, and has been succeeded by several others, until at present it is represented by the Grand Priory, which
now claims to have been healed by union with the regular Scottish Knights Templar body, the Early Grand
Encampment. This alleged union is as false as all else in its history, as, instead of a union between two
bodies there was a secession of some of the members of the Early Grand engineered by one A. A. Murray,
who had been made a Knight Templar under the irregular body and subsequently—professing to see the error
of his way—became healed in the regular body, and by professing unbounded enthusiasm for his new love
and distaste for the old one, he wormed himself into the confidence of the members to such an extent that he
was ultimately elected G.M., thus placed in a position to accomplish—as he fondly thought—the end he had
in view when he became a member of the regular body. In this he did not count on the loyalty of the ancient
Encampments, who rejected him and his traitorous schemes with scorn, and the only result of his perfidy was
that he succeeded in banding over to the irregular Priory the funds and some of the property of the Early
Grand, and having himself made Scribe E. of the Supreme Chapter. The Early Grand Encampment, however,
goes on its way as before, true to its ancient motto, We were the first, we shall be the last.'
" 'The Royal Order of Scotland' has been worked as a side step or degree in the Scottish Encampments of
Knights Templar long before the body calling itself a G.L. of that Rite was organised, and we have it on the
authority of Lyon, Hughan, and Gould, the Masonic historians, that the Rite was known and practised in
France, Holland, and England long years before this so-called G.L. was thought of, that, in fact, its very
knowledge of the degrees was obtained from Holland, its founders being ignorant of the fact that it was
known and practised in the Early Grand Encampments.
" The body styling itself 'The Supreme Council of the A. and A. Scottish Rite is the most monstrous fraud of
all. The others whose irregularity the G.L. of Scotland covers with the mantle of its recognition cannot claim
to be de facto, much less de jure, of Scottish origin. With this one the assumption of the Scottish name is a
bare-faced fraud, as it was only introduced into Scotland from France in 1846 in opposition to the native
Scottish high-grade body, 'the Grand Council of Rites,' and the French body which gave this Supreme
Council birth was not even a native of France, but had been introduced there in opposition to the regular
French Grand Orient. The French intruder was in turn the offspring of a fraudulent body founded in America
in 1802 by five Jew peddlers, an organisation styled by the historian Kloss 'the grand lie of the order,' and by
the historian Ragan ' the father of all the bastard children of Freemasonry.' It has created dissention in the
Craft in every country cursed with its presence. In many cases it has caused splits and disunion where
otherwise harmony would have prevailed. As noticed above, when it first approached the G.L. of Scotland for
recognition, that body indignantly repudiated its claim to Scottish Masonry. The present members of G.L.,
lacking the wisdom of their predecessors, have taken this unclean thing to their bosom, and the result is the
inevitable—first wrangling and dissension, then persecution and disunion.
"A word regarding the legitimate and native Scottish high-grade bodies which she has declined to recognise,
and which never sought G.L. recognition, but was always found loyally supporting G.L. as supreme in Craft
Masonry and knowing nothing else. Of these there are two, the Early Grand Encampment of Knights
Templar, with Encampments dating back to the eighteenth century (see Lyon's History of Masonry in
Scotland), and with an unbroken succession of G.Ms. since 1822. Grand Encampment controls the degrees of
Pilgrim, Knight Templar, Mediterranean Pass, and Knight of Malta. The other, the Scottish Grand Council of
Rites, has an existence coeval with the Grand Encampment, is also an Early Grand body. It controls the
higher degrees of Scottish Masonry, as also the Masonic Rites of Memphis and Mizraim. It also has an
unbroken line of G.Ms. since 1822.
" Knowing thus the history of the several high-grade bodies working in Scotland, the native Scottish as well
as the foreign importations, knowing also that it is the latter and not the former that has sought to make the
Craft Lodge their battleground and G.L. descend from its acknowledged position as conservator of pure
Symbolic Masonry, to become the tool of a clique, is it to be wondered at that the brethren who wish to have
Scottish Craft Masonry governed, as of old, by a Craft G.L. which would live up to the ancient law that G.L.
knows but the degrees of St. John's Masonry, should brand a G.L. that would seek to introduce other degrees
as having ceased to represent the Scottish Craft, that it had forsaken the Landmarks and broken the covenants
made by its predecessors, and who is no more the successor of the G.L. formed on St. Andrew's Day, 1736,
and which had ceased to exist, that therefore no Scottish Mason owed it further allegiance? Or that they
should have proceeded to resuscitate the original G.L. under the style and title, ' the National Symbolic G.L.
of Scotland of Free and Accepted Masons ?'
" The National Symbolic G.L. invites all Scottish Masons to assist in the work of renovating Scottish
Masonry, to clear it from the weeds and tares that have sprung up and threatened to choke it, to make it, as it
was of old, the bulwark of true Craft Masonry and the uncompromising enemy of un-Masonic innovations.
" The work to which we have set ourselves is a great one, but with your assistance, brethren, we are sure of
success. Let us leave to our sons as a heritage the true Scottish Masonry we have inherited from our fathers,
a Masonry characteristic of the Scottish nation, the peer of all, the tool of none.
"And to this end may the G.A.O.T.U. aid and guide us.
" On behalf of the National Symbolical G.L. of Scotland."
—" Universal Freemason."
———————
NECESSITY OF THE ROYAL ARCH.
———<>———
The system of Masonic degrees, as now practised, is the product of an evolution. Prior to 1717 there is no
record that Freemasonry consisted of more than one degree. The symbolism, the beautiful lectures, the ornate
diction, with which we find it clothed to-day, represents the growth and development from the crude and
transition stage of past centuries. Strictly speaking, there was no degree from the dawn of Freemasonry until
it began to take on the speculative feature. Before the speculative era, the initiate or Apprentice was sworn on
" the buke " to observe certain charges, now known as the " Ancient Charges and Regulations." This
constituted the entire ceremony, with perhaps the recital of the various legends of the Craft, portions of
which are retained to this day.
The Mason, prior to the "Revival" of 1717, was designated as an Apprentice, F.C., or Master, not because of
any special ceremony or degree work, but on account of the length of the time of service and skill manifested
in his handicraft. The Ancient Charges and Regulations, as read to the Apprentices, referred to the duties they
owed to each other, to the Lodge, and the Holy Church. It is even doubted by some of our best Masonic
historians that a grip and password were connected with these ancient ceremonies.
Ancient Craft Masonry, from its earliest legendary (625 A.D.), down to 1740, made no pretensions to
philosophical speculations. No latter-day wise men existed to convert the simple tools of the operative
craftsman into a philosophical fog bank. Near the middle of the eighteenth century other than mere
operatives were admitted into the guilds or Lodges, and men were elected to preside over the brethren who
were not skilled in the implements of the Craft. The introduction of the speculative Mason prepared the way
for the dawn of Freemasonry. The so-called "Revival" of 1717 was but the bursting forth of the evolutionary
forces that had been slowly developing for half a century. These same forces are at work to-day, so that it can
be truly said that Freemasonry is a progressive science. Masonic historians are agreed that some time
between 1723 and 1730 the Second and Third Degrees were evolved, and in this evolution of degrees,
ritualism and symbolism were developed, resulting in the intellectual and philosophical Freemasonry of
today.
The central idea of the entire system of Freemasonry became the " loss " and " recovery " of the " Word,"
symbolizing death and the resurrection, the ending of the present and the beginning of the future life. The
student of Freemasonry must admit that "The Word" is the central point around which the entire system of
Masonic symbols must revolve. "Its possession is the consummation of all Masonic knowledge; when lost,
its recovery is the soul's object of symbolic labour." Mackey says : "No event in the history of Speculative
Freemasonry had so important an influence upon its development as a system of symbolism, as the invention
of the R.A. Degree and its introduction into the Masonic ritual."
The R.A. stands as the rainbow of promise in the ritual ; it stands as the promise of the resurrection; of that
which was lost and that it shall be recovered.
The question arises as to whether the Master's Word was originally communicated in the Third Degree? On
this point there is some diversity of opinion. In our present ritual of the Third Degree the Master's Word is
lost. Dr. Oliver, a noted Masonic historian, says : " The True Word was never lost, but transferred to the
R.A.," and, in corroboration of this statement further says : "I have before me an old French engraving of the
ground work of the Master's Lodge, dated in 1740, containing the usual emblems and on the coffin is the
'True Word' in Roman capitals." This would tend to prove that before the legend of Hiram Abiff was
introduced into the Master's Degree, the True Word was communicated in the Master's Degree and not a
Substitute Word. It necessarily followed that when the legend of Hiram became a part of the ritual of this
degree, the "loss" of the "Word" followed, as the "loss" is a part of the Hiramic legend. But the "loss"
without a "recovery" would be an absurdity ; to complete the symbolism of Freemasonry, the "Word " must
be recovered, hence the necessity for a fourth Degree, the R.A.
In 1738, or earlier, the story of the loss of the Word and the new legend, the R.A., were gradually introduced
into Lodges, and when the division occurred (1751), dividing the Freemasonry of England into the
"Moderns" and "Ancients." the latter organised a G.L. and adopted a ritual of four degrees, the fourth being
the RA.
The G.L. of " Moderns " evidently continued to use the old ritual, without the legend of Hiram Abiff, while
the G.L. of "Ancients" used the new ritual containing the Hiramic legend and the Fourth Degree, until the
year 1813, when the two G.Ls. united and formed the present G.L. of England, known as the United G.L. of
England. It is therefore to the G.L. of Ancients that we owe the Master's Degree as found in our ritual and
also the preservation of the R.A. Degree. One of the articles of union of the two G.Ls. of England in 1813
was the retention of the degrees as formulated by the G.L. of " Ancients"; hence, among the articles of
agreement of this union, we find the only declaration made anywhere or at any time as to what constitutes
"Ancient Craft Masonry." This article declares that "Ancient Craft Masonry shall consist of the degrees of
E.A., F.C., and M.M., together with the Holy R.A."
We see, therefore, that the R. A. is merely the evolution of a truth contained in the early Third Degree. It is
not a "Higher Degree," but the last volume of a series in sublime story revealed through symbolism. The
Master's Degree without the R.A. is a story half told, a song unsung, and a, promise unfulfilled. The
candidate is promised that he should receive, but is put off with a "Substitute." He is left in darkness, m
doubt, and to the thoughtful one in a condition of disappointment. Yet, there is a purpose behind this seeming
deception. Light and revealed Truth come only through toil and willing service. This lesson must be learned
before any Mason is qualified to know and appreciate the Truth, the Master's Word. It is, possibly,
unfortunate that the R.A. Degree was separated from the "Blue Degrees" ; but, whether fortunate or
unfortunate, the R.A. stands as the last of the degrees in Ancient Craft Masonry. It is the summit, and no
M.M. is in possession of all that Freemasonry teaches without the R.A. The series of four degrees continued
to be conferred under a Lodge charter until about 1750, in America at least. The earliest history that we have
of the R.A. in this country was in 1758, when it was conferred under a Lodge charter in Philadelphia. It was
introduced into New York about the same time by an English military Lodge, in Massachusetts in 1869,
where it was conferred by St. Andrew's Lodge.
Since that time the R.A. Degree has remained secure in its superior place. "The term R.A. Lodge was
succeeded by Chapter and R.A. Chapter. The word Chapter was used in Connecticut as early as 5th
September, 1783; in Pennsylvania, 5th September, 1789; in New York, 29th April, 1791; in Massachusetts,
19th December, 1794. The word Chapter took the place of Lodge in England, for the first time, 29th April,
1758. The word companion, used in the Chapter in place of brother, was first used in England in 1778. These
terms, Chapter and Companion, were soon carried to America, where they flourish as elements in the
capitular system of degrees."
Such, in brief, is the history of the R.A. Degree; its parentage is as legitimate as any of the degrees of
Ancient Craft Masonry; it sprang from the introduction of Speculative Freemasonry into Operative
Masonry—the fruit of symbolism and allegory. To be a M.M. is the highest and most honourable degree that
any man can attain; it entitles him to all the rights and privileges of the Craft; all the accumulated so-called
higher degrees do not add anything to his Masonic stature. The R.A. is a part of the Master's Degree—the
summit of its excellence. It is the privilege and should be the duty of M.Ms. to complete the Masonic story,
told in allegory and revealed in symbolism by receiving the R.A..—"Book of Information," Orient Chapter.
———————
ROLL OF HONOUR.
———<>———
Bro. Prince Maurice of Battenberg, who has died of his wounds, was born on 3rd October, 1891, and was the
youngest of the three sons of Princess Henry of Battenberg, whose husband died in January, 1896, while on
his way to Madeira, suffering from fever, after taking part in the operations of the British Expedition to
Ashanti. Prince Maurice from his boyhood showed a decided liking for healthy sport, was an excellent
golfer, sometimes played cricket and football, and took a keen interest in aviation, having made many flights
from the Hendon aerodrome, and looped the loop with Hamel. He really did not know what fear was. When
at the war with his regiment, about the end of last month, he very narrowly escaped the rifles of the enemy. It
was his first battle. The men on either side of him were shot, and a bullet went through his cap. Prince
Maurice was highly esteemed by all his brother officers, and among the men he was very popular for his
cheerfulness and soldierly qualities. To his widowed mother, Princess Henry of Battenberg, his sister the
Queen of Spain, his two brothers who are both on active service, Freemasons tender the most sincere
sympathy. Prince Maurice's untimely death in the full vigour of his youth will cause deep regret among the
members of the Order, for he was one of our most promising brethren. He was initiated in the Heroum Filii
Lodge, No. 3404 (the Lodge of Old Wellingtonians), on 21st June, 1912, at Wellington; and was passed in
the following October and raised in November, in London. He was the present W.M. of the Twelve Brothers
Lodge, No. 785, Southampton, having been installed on 22nd April last.
* * * *
Great regret has been caused throughout Court circles and Freemasonry also by the official news of the death
of Bro. Captain Thomas Henry Rivers Bulkeley, of the Scots Guards, who has been killed in action.
Our late brother was initiated in the Studholme Lodge, No. 1591. He subsequently joined the Kitchener
Lodge, No, 2998, Simla. He was exalted in the Simla Chapter, No. 2998. In September, 1910, he was made a
P.S.G.D. of England.
Captain Bulkeley was until recently Equerry to the Duke of Connaught, and has been Comptroller to His
Royal Highness's Household in Canada since 1911. He married last year Miss Evelyn Pelly, lady-in-waiting
to the Duchess of Connaught, and leaves an infant son. Mrs. Rivers Bulkeley is the daughter of Lady Lilian
Yorke and the late Sir Henry Pelly, Bart., and grand-daughter of the late Earl of Wemyss.
Son of Colonel Charles Rivers Bulkeley, the late officer was born on 23rd June, 1876, at Whitchurcb, Salop,
and was educated at Eton. In 1894 he joined the Oxford Militia, in which he became captain three years later.
In 1899 he was gazetted second lieutenant in the Scots Guards, and from that year until 1902 he was serving
on the Staff in the South African War. He took part in Lord Methuen's advance to the relief of Kimberley, and
was slightly wounded at Belmont, but subsequently fought at Paardeberg and in other actions. He was three
times mentioned in despatches, and received the Queen's medal with six clasps and the King's medal with
two clasps. Captain Bulkeley was A.D.C. and Comptroller of the Household to successive Viceroys of India,
Earl Curzon of Kedleston, and the Earl of Minto, and then acted as A.D.C. to Field-Marshal the Duke of
Connaught from 1907 to 1909.
* * * *
Bro. William Edward Stroud, who was well known as the naval nightwatchman at Clarence Gate, went down
in the "Cressy." He was in the Royal Fleet Reserve, and was just on fifty-five. He has left a young son.
—"Freemason's Chronicle."
———————
WHAT IS MASONRY?
———<>———
(CLEMENT E. STRETTON, Secretary York Division Worshipful Society of Free Masons, Rough Masons,
Wailers, Slaters, Paviors, Plaisterers, and Bricklayers.)
——————
Bro. Ryerson, in the July issue of the " Tyler-Keystone," page 150, appears to be under the impression that
the ancient " Worshipful Society of Free Masons," Operative, was, as he says, "a sort of labour union." The
Society requests me to point out that there is a very important difference between the ancient Masons' Trade
Guild and a labour trade union.
The Trade Guild was and still is a society in which the masters and the men worked together for the mutual
advantage of both, and for the protection of their trade.
On the other hand, the modern form of labour trade union works simply in the interests of the workmen and
against those of the masters, and this is the reason why, in these days, there are constant strikes and disputes,
but under the old Trade Guilds such disputes were settled without any trouble.
The Worshipful Society of Free Masons, Operative, has in its possession details of many such cases. For
instance, as long ago as A.D. 1356 there was a "dispute" in London between the "Masons who were hewers"
and "light-Masons or setters." A congregation was held, presided over by the Mayor, and new regulations
were drawn up, and further trouble ceased.
The York Division of the Operative Society of Masons (of which the writer is secretary) has in its possession
the proof that "King Athelstan gave Masons a Charter A.D. 926, and in twelve years to come, 1926, it will
have been in force for one thousand years, and this is the authority under which the Society still works. But it
is also in possession of Acts of Parliament, passed in the years 1562 and 1825.
The three Master Masons of each Operative Lodge are required to see that the Act of 1825 is always in their
possession before proceeding to open their Lodge, and they are further instructed " to immediately produce
the said Act of 1825 to all judges, law officers, and police officers on demand." Thus the legal position and
locus standi of the Worshipful Society of Free Masons, Operative, are clearly defined and established.
Originally Operative Free Masonry in England was, and still remains, a religion and a trade combined.
Previously to the time of Henry VIII., bishops, priests, and monks were Designers, Master Masons, and
working members of the Free Masons' Trade Guild, and there is clear proof that Masons' Lodges which
worked on cathedrals and churches required all the Masons to be Christians, but this requirement was struck
out at the time of the Reformation and Henry VIII.
The very fact that in ancient times the Operative Mason's' system was to a great extent under the control of
the church accounts for the Society having so very much in its possession which refers to religion and trade
combined. On the other hand, when Dr. James Anderson, in his 1723 Constitutions, "digested" the old system
into the Speculative method, he struck out the name of God in his first charge. Having been both an
Operative and a Speculative Free Mason for the past forty-three years, and been a Master in both, .the writer
is satisfied that the Speculative has been derived from the old Operative Guild system.—Leicester, England,
16th July.—" The Tyler-Keystone."
———————
FREEMASONRY IN BELGIUM.
———<>———
English Lodges were established at Alost in 1765, at Ghent in 1768, and at Mons in 1770. The latest of the
three, La Parfaite Union, claims (though on wholly insufficient evidence, says Bro. Freke Gould in his
"History of Freemasonry") to have been originally constituted by the Duke of Montagu, G.M. of England, in
1721.
Under Joseph II. Masonry, in what was then the Austrian Netherlands, greatly flourished, but all the Lodges,
with the exception of three, were closed by that Emperor in 1786. Others, indeed, continued to exist, but all
Lodges, including the privileged three, were formally prohibited from assembling, by an edict of 1787.
During the closing year of the eighteenth century, and until 1814, the Masonry of Belgium was conducted
under the ægis of the G. Orient of France.
Prince Frederick William, second son of King William L, was elected G.M. in Holland in 1816, of Belgium
in 1817, and of a G. Orient, with jurisdiction over the Lodges in both these countries, in 1818. In 1830
Belgium obtained its political, and shortly afterwards its Masonic, independence. Prince Frederick, however,
remained at the head of the Dutch Craft until his death in 1881.
The G. Orient of Belgium was constituted in 1833.
There are twenty-four Lodges in Belgium, with a total membership of about 3,500. Five Lodges meet at
Antwerp, four at Brussels, two each at Ghent and Verviers, one each at Bruges, Charleroi, Courtrai, Huy,
Tournai, Louvain, Liege, Mons, Namur, Spa, and Stanleyville (Congo).
The G.L. of England is not in friendly relationship with the G. Orient of Belgium (as the G. Orient of France),
and consequently there is no interchange of representatives. — "Freemason's Chronicle."
———————
NEW YEAR'S GREETING.
———<>———
Give a tender thought and a word love-fraught to the friends of "Auld Lang. Syne ;"
To the friends who are dead in the year that has fled— old comrades of yours and mine;
Then a cheery smile, and an eye without guile, and a word of kindly cheer,
With a heart-warm grasp in a true man's clasp to the friends of the Glad New Year.
Thus the future face with a heart of grace, marching always in the van;
While the joy bells zing and the moments swing toward the BROTHERHOOD OF MAN.
—Exchange.
———————————————————————————————————————————
Reports.
———————————————————————————————————————————
[Secretaries and Scribes are requested to forward Reports.]
————
CRAFT LODGES.
————
SOUTHLAND.
Taringatura, No 100. — The last meeting for 1914 on 7th December was well attended. Bro H. Graham made
his first appearance in the chair, and acquitted himself creditably. One joining brother from Scotland was
duly received by ballot, and several appeals were also considered. The usual “washing up”accounts were
passed for payment, including G.L. half-yearly dues, as it is the laudable desire of the brethren to close not
only the financial year (in September) but he solar year, too, free from liabilities. The question of
contribiutions to the M.W.G.M.’s War Benevolence Fund was considered, and including the individual
contributions of members and the savings effected on the annual installation banquet, the Treas. Was able to
make up £22 18s. 6d. as the amount to be sent in by this Lodge. That amount, quite apart from the usual
contribution to the W. and O. and A.M. Fund, is to be sent with the half-yearly returns. It was announced tha
at the next meeting on 25th January the Third Degree would be conferred on a member of Lodge Fortitude at
the request of the W.M. of that Lodge. The Lodge closed at 9.40 p.m., and during a brief period spent in the
refectory, mutual good wishes for the coming Christmas season were exchanged.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————————
OTAGO.
Oceanic, No. 154.—The monthly meeting was held on the 18th ult., when there was a large attendance of
both members an visitors. W. Bro. J. Couchman, who occupied the chair for the first time, had a Third
Degree to work, and both he and his officers are to be congratulated upon the result. One new member was
elected, and Bros. A. J. Couchman (Lodge Harvey) and A. J. C. Runciman (Lodge Rawhiti) joined the Lodge
as affiliate members. A vote of sympathy was passed to R.W. Bro. D. A. Jolly, the first W.M. of Oceanic, on
account of his illness, and a letter of thanks was ordered to be forwarded to Bro. J. E. Green, at present a
resident of Auckland, for notifying the Lodge as to the state of Bro. Jolly's health. After the Lodge was
closed the usual pleasant hour was spent in the refectory.—(Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Masters' Lodge, No. 161.—At the November meeting an exceedingly interesting and educational paper was
read by R.W. Bro. J. J. Clark, Prov.G.M., being entitled "The Early Days of Freemasonry." After a short
discussion the usual vote of thanks was accorded to the lecturer. Amongst the visitors was R.W. Bro. W. J.
Rees, Prov.G.M, of the Irish Constitution. Bro. Rees expressed himself as very pleased at having be present,
and congratulated Bro. Clark on the high standard of his paper. Two new members were proposed. In the
absence of the W.M., through sickness, W. Bro. A. Fieldwick, I.P.M., occupied the chair. At the request of the
Prov.G.M., the W.M. (Bro. R. Jamieson) is making arrangements for himself and officers to conduct the
installation of the W.M. and invest the officers of Lodge St. Thomas Kil., 83 (Kaitangata) early next year.
The R.W.Prov.G.M. will preside and act as installing officer, but all the rest of the work will be performed by
officers of the Masters' Lodge.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————————
CANTERBURY.
Southern Cross, No. 6.—An emergency meeting was held in the Masonic Hall, Kaiapoi, on 23rd November.
The business was the nomination and election of W.M. and officers. This second election was made
necessary on account of the Master-elect, Bro. Blighting, leaving for the North Island a fortnight before the
date of installation.
The annual meeting was held at Kaiapoi on 3rd December the attendance being good. After formal business,
V.W. Bro. J. Thornton, D.P.G.M., and officers of Prov.G.L. were admitted and fittingly received. Bro. William
Arthur Gribble, Master-elect, was presented, and having subscribed to the ancient charges was Obligated,
and on the retirement of M.M was installed as W.M. by V.W. Bro. Thornton. Bro. F.C. Bishop presented the
W.Ts. The usual proclamations made, and the W.Ts were presented by W. Bros. J. R. Kent, P. J. Coates, and
T. Lister. The officers were invested by Bros. W. Broadley and R. Baldwin as follows :—I.P.M., W, Bro. A.
L. Gray; S.W. Bro. T. Hoskin; J.W., Bro. W.C. McPherson. Chaplain, W. Bro. J. H. Crawshaw ; Treas. W.
Bro. R. Wylie; Sec., Bro. R. H. Croft; S.D., Bro. C.T. Baynon ; J.D., Bro. F. J. Garnett; D. of C., Bro. G. A.
Kisling; Organist, Bro. C. Hoskin; I.G., Bro. H. McDougall; Stewards, Bros. J. P. Mably and J. E. Monk;
Tyler, Bro. J. A. Mealings. The address to the Master was given by V.W. Bro. J. Thornton, to the Wardens by
W. Bro. H. Hopkinson, and the concluding address to the brethren by W. Bro. J.N. Du Feu. Refreshments
were subsequently served in the refectory.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Progress, No. 22.—The installation of W. Bro. R. B. B. Willis, P.G.D., as Master took place on 1st
December. In the absence of the W.M., Bro. J. C. Free, who was away electioneering, the Lodge was opened
by the I.P.M., W. Bro. Wickliff, who has occupied the chair frequently of late. Heavy but welcome rain fell,
which prevented many visitors from a distance coming. Punctual to the minute the R.W. Prov.G.M., Bro. F.
C. Burns, P.G.M., with his Deputy, V.W. Bro. Thornton, and Prov.G.L. officers—who had motored from
Christchurch—were announced, and admitted and assumed the various chairs, and proceeded to install the
W.M.-elect, who being on old P.M., did not necessitate the full ceremony being given. The W.Ts. of the three
degrees were presented briefly but feelingly by W. Bro. Jacobs (W.M. of Lodge Waihora, 141), W. Bro.
Penlington (P.M. of the same Lodge), and W. Bro. D. T. Wraight (W.M. Lodge Ahurewa, 181) respectively.
The newly-installed W.M. invested his Wardens and officers in a manner which showed no evidence of rust
through want of work. A dainty little stand-up supper was partaken of in the refectory, and a few formal
toasts proposed. Regret was also made at the absence of R.W. Bro. D. T. J. Withers, who was called away
just before the meeting. After a pleasant forty minutes in the refectory the members of Prov.G.L. started on
their return to Christchurch, and a very happy and enjoyable meeting ended at 10.30 p.m.—[Lodge
Correspondent.]
————
Concord, No. 39.—The monthly meeting took place in the Masonic Hall, Papanui, on the 25th November.
W. Bro. Gasson, I.P.M., in the absence of W. Bro. Laurie, W.M., in the chair. A sum of £2 2s. was voted
towards a case of distress in the Wellington district. W. Bro. Baldwin's annual appeal for the Empty Stocking
Fund met with a satisfactory response. The calls for subscriptions lately, especially in connection with the
war, have been so numerous, and may continue to be so for some time, that other benevolent calls will
probably suffer in consequence. The ordinary individual who works for the average salary cannot go on
indefinitely giving shillings and half-crowns without economising somewhere. If the man who can afford to
give £1 or £5 would only give as often and in proportion to the man who can only afford the humble two
shillings at a time, it would make a material difference to many of the funds that are at present being raised
throughout the Dominion. A candidate was initiated, the ceremony being carried out in a very creditable
manner, the W.M. of the Civic Lodge presenting the W.Ts. Our S.W. is giving every promise of being a first-
class ritualist, and should ably fill the W.M.'s chair when he reaches that exalted position. His rendering of
the charge after initiation is always a pleasure to listen to. An exceedingly pleasant evening was spent in the
refectory. The brothers Orchard gave some excellent vocal items, and Bro. Dick Morgan was in his usual
fettle. A collection in aid of the M.W.G.M.'s Masonic War Fund was taken up during the evening. Wishing
the CRAFTSMAN the compliments of the season.— [Lodge Correspondent.] [Heartily reciprocated.—ED.C.]
————
Methven, No. 51.—The regular meeting was held on 2nd December. The W.M., Bro. Donald Duff, presided
over an attendance of 25. One gentleman was elected to membership. One brother was passed to the F.C.
Degree by the W.M., assisted by W. Bro. Goodwin, Signs Bro. McKee, S.E.: Bro. Hitchcock. W.Ts. ; Bro.
Mitchell, Charge after P.; Bro. Stone, T.B. A long discussion ensued on the method by which the Lodge
would subscribe to the M.W.G.M's appeal, and was finally left over to next meeting, a notice of motion being
given for that night. A pleasant hour was spent in the refectory, when the kindly feelings between Lodges
Methven and Erewhon were much in evidence.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Robert Burns, No. 139.—On 1st December a visit was paid to Lodge Tawera, Oxford. Despite the very
unpropitious weather some 22 members made the trip, and were accompanied by W. Bro. Vincent (W.M.
Avon Lodge). The party occupied five motor cars, and made the 40-mile trip in safety. They were accorded a
hearty reception by the Tawera brethren, who invited them to confer the Third Degree upon a brother by the
Scotch method. As this was the first occasion upon which a "Scotch Third" had been worked in Tawera
Lodge, the brethren were greatly interested. The following took part in the ceremony : W.M., W. Bro. R. W.
S. Eastwood (Ob., W.Ts., and Ex.). I.G., Bro. Blackmore (Charge after T.). W. Bro. T. Neuburgh (Ss. and
Light of M.M.), W. Bro. R. Vincent, V.M. Avon Lodge (Ex. Ss.), S.D., Bro. T. Kirker (Charge after R.), S.W.,
Bro. Taylor, and J.W., Bro. Wilson (T.H.), whilst Chaplain Bro. L. Ormandy recited the prayers. After the
Lodge was closed an adjournment was made to the refectory, where a very pleasant time was spent. W. Bro.
Weld (W.M. Lodge Tawera) mentioned that he was especially pleased to have the Robert Burns members
with them again, as the first Tawera candidate had been initiated by the Robert Burns Lodge. After having
spent a very enjoyable evening, the visitors left for Christchurch about 12.30 a.m., and a pleasant run was
made back to town.
The regular meeting was held in St. Augustine's Hall, Christchurch, on 15th December, when there was a
good attendance of members and visitors, the W.M., W. Bro. R. W. S. Eastwood, presiding. The usual routine
business was quickly disposed of, and two persons were initiated. The W.M. was assisted by W. Bro. Thomas
(W.M. Christchurch Lodge), Charge after I.; J.W., Bro. T. Wilson, N.B. Charge; I.P.M., W. Bro. Bush, R. for
Prep. ; W. Bro. Bingham (W.M. St. Alban's Lodge), W.Ts.; and S.W., Bro. Taylor, Final Charge. An excellent
explanation of the T.B. was given by S.D. Bro. T. Kirker, and Bro. L. Ormandy made an efficient Chaplain.
Two fresh propositions were made for membership. After the Lodge was closed the usual pleasant hour was
spent in the refectory. — [Lodge Correspondent.]
————————
MARLBOROUGH AND NELSON.
Unanimity, No. 106.—The monthly meeting was held on the 3rd December, there being a good attendance
of members and visiting brethren. Two brethren were raised to the M.M. Degree by the W.M., assisted by
several of the P.Ms. Some discussion took place in reference to the War Benevolent Fund, when it was
decided that a levy of 1/- per member per month be made during the duration of the war. This appealed to
most of the members as being more satisfactory than haphazard and irregular donations, as one P.M. pointed
out that if this method were adopted by the whole of the Lodges throughout the Dominion an amount of
between £500 and £600 would be raised monthly. I note that several other Lodges have already done this.—
[Lodge Correspondent.]
————————
HAWKES BAY.
Bedford, No. 25. — The monthly meeting was held in the Lodgeroom on the 1st December. W.M. Bro. W.
H. Booth presided. A notification from G.L. re annual communication to be held in Wellington on 12th May
next was read, and W. Bro. W. A. Chambers was nominated for "any office " in G.L. A circular general appeal
was supported, and several accounts were passed for payment. Two candidates were passed to the Second
Degree, being Obligated by the W.M. and Entrusted by W. Bro. Elliott; Investiture, S.W. Bro. Gore; W.Ts.,
J.W. Bro. Williams ; S.E. Address, W. Bro. John Scholes ; Final Charge, S.W. Bro. Gore. A very hearty vote
of thanks was accorded to W. Bro. D. Milne for his presentation to the Lodge of a beautiful piece of furniture
in the shape of an Altar. This fine spirit of emulation has been in evidence among the members for some time
past, much of the inside furnishings having been donated by members at different times. One candidate was
balloted for and accepted, and one other was proposed. In the refectory a newly-passed brother gave an
interesting sketch of his recent trip Home, and related how he was "discovered " on board ship, and taken in
hand.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Abercorn, No. 30.—The installation of Bro. Thomas Williams as W.M. took place is the Masonic Hall,
Waipawa, on 14th December. The Lodge met at 4 p.m., when the ordinary business was disposed of. Lodge
was then called off, and resumed at 7.30 p.m. The ceremony was performed by R.W. Bro. Harston,
Prov.G.M., assisted by R.W. Bro. T. Hobson, W. Bros. J. Hobson, P. Wall, J. W. Elliott, D. Milne, H. Hoben,
W. Chambers, Morrison, and Carter, Bro. Parkin acting as Trumpeter. The ceremony was conducted in an
impressive manner. The following officers were invested :—I.P.M., W. Bro. J. M. Watson; S.W., Bro. W.
Pasco; J.W., Bro. A. Parkin ; Treas., Bro. R. W. Todd ; Sec., . Bro. Gee. H. Hunt; Chaplain, Bro. E. E. Bott;
S.D., Bro. F. E. Rowe ; J.D., Bro. J. Milburn; I.G., Bro. T. M. Moor; S.S., Bro. G. Nielson ; J.S., Bro. W. V.
Verran. After the Lodge was closed the brethren partook of supper, when the usual loyal and Masonic toasts
were honoured.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Ruahine, No. 80.—The monthly meeting was held on the 1st December. A few accounts were passed for
payment, and the sum of one guinea voted towards a circular appeal. One candidate took his M.M. Degree,
and W. Bro. A. Stevenson, W.M., who Obligated the candidate, was ably assisted in his work by W. Bro.
Leigh, who communicated the Signs; W. Bro. Cartwright delivered the T.H., W. Bro. Horne the Exhortation,
W. Bro. Burley the T.B. and additional S. ; W. Bro. F. J. Hutchins presented the W.Ts., and W. Bro. H. Turvey
delivered the Final Charge. The V. of S.L. was presented by the W.M. The Lodge commenced business fairly
promptly, but it was after 11 p.m. before the Lodge was closed, and it was unanimously agreed to dispense
with the "Fourth," which rarely occurs. The Sec. reported that the M.W.G.M.'s appeal for funds in connection
with the War Benevolent Fund was meeting with success, and judging by the number of Ruahine's brethren
who had already paid or promised, he thought that not a single member on the roll would fail to subscribe. —
[Lodge Correspondent.]
————————
AUCKLAND.
Maungawhao, No. 168.—The installation meeting was held at the Masonic Hall, Mount Eden, on the 19th
November. There was a very large attendance of members and visitors. The installation of the Master-elect,
Bro. Charles Hudson, was conducted by M.W. Bro. Oliver Nicholson, Prov.G.M. who was assisted by R.W.
Bro. J. Catchpole, S.G.W., R.W. Bro. G. Barclay, P.S.G.W. (act.-J.G.W.), W. Bro. A. H. Walker, P.G. D. of C.
(act.-G.P.), W. Bro. C. M. Page, P.G.D. of C., as G.D. of C. and other G.L. officers. The W.M.-elect was
presented by W. Bro. A. I. Farmer (I.P.M. Lodge Ara, No. 1) and W. Bro. W. J. Arnold (W.M. Lodge
Auckland, No. 87). The W.Ts. in the degrees were presented by W. Bro. Coltman W.M. Lodge Albion, No.
45), W. Bro. W. Bridgman (W.M. Lodge St. Andrew, No. 8), and W. Bro. W. R. Leighton (W.M. Lodge
Waitakerei, No. 170) respectively. The address to the W.M. was delivered by R.W. Bro. F. Kearsley,
P.D.G.M., to the Wardens by R.W. Bro. J. Catchpole, S.G.W., and to the brethren by R.W. Bro. G. Barclay,
P.S.G.W. The W.M. invested the following officers :—I.P.M., W. Bro. H. L. Wade; S.W., Bro. H. T. Surman;
J.W., Bro. N. T. Williams; Chaplain, V.W. Bro. Rev. E. J. McFarland, P.G. Chaplain; Treas., W. Bro. H. N.
Gill, P.M. - Sec., V.W. Bro. F. H. Mueller, P.G.R.; S.D., Bro. P. M. Macfarlane; J.D., Bro. D. Smith; D. of C.,
W. Bro. J. Vuglar, P.M.; I.G., Bro. F. R. Trevithick ; S.S., Bro. S. G. Burns; J.S., Bro. W. I. Stemson; Asst.-
Stewards, Bros. W. S. Cooper and S. Orbell; Tyler, Bro. G. J. Thorpe. The offertory on behalf of the W. and
O. and A.M. Fund amounted to £54 17s.—[Lodge Correspondent.] [Too late for December issue.—Ed.C.]
————————
WELLINGTON.
St. Andrew, No. 32,—The installation meeting was held on St. Andrew's Day (30th November) at the
Masonic Hall, and it attracted a large gathering of members and visitors. The Lodge was tyled at 6.30 p.m.,
the W.M., Bro. C. W. Nielsen, presiding, and after transaction of some routine business visitors were
received, including the W.Ms., officers, and brethren of all city Lodges, and the W.M. of Lodge Commercial
Travellers, N.S.W. W. Bro. F. J. Hunn attended from Masterton, and acted in his official capacity of G.D. of
C. in an efficient and painstaking manner. The Prov.G.M., R.W. Bro. T. A. Peterkin, was received, followed
by M.W. Bro. H. J. Williams, P.G.M.; R.W. Bro. H. H. Seaton, J.G.W.; V.W. Bro. H. B. Bridge, G.Lec.; W.
Bro. J. H. Worboys, S.G.D.; W. Bro. A. Veitch, P.G. Supt. of W.; W. Bro. J. Firth, G.S.B. The W.M.-elect, Bro.
A..W. Rowlands, S.M., was then installed according to ancient custom by R.W. Bro. Peterkin, assisted by
M.W. Bro. Williams and other G.L. officers. W. Bro. J. H. Worboys invested the following officers :—Dep.-
Master, W. Bro. F. C. Broomhall; S.W., Bro. W. Simpson ; J.W., Bro. A. Schmidt; Sec., Bro. J. B. Lea; Treas.,
W. Bro. A. T. Wells ; Chaplain, W. Bro. G. Russell; D. of C., W. Bro. J. Rod; Organist, Bro. J. Cowley; S.D.,
Bro. J. A. Riddell; J.D., Bro. A. Greening LG., Bro. L. McGregor ; B.S., Bro. G. Lawrence; J.S., Bro. T.
Johnstone; acting-Tyler, Bro. A. E. Colman. W. Bro. J. W. Elison, P.G.D. of C., presented the Warrant,
Constitution, and By-laws, and the W.Ts. in the respective degrees were presented by W. Bro. O. Neilson,
P.G.D. (Third Degree), W. Bro. G. Russell (Second Degree), W. Bro. T. Jaffray (First Degree). The addresses
to the Master, Wardens, and brethren were very ably delivered by R.W. Bro. G. Allport (D.D.G.M., E.G.), W.
Bro. J. Rod, and R.W. Bro. T. A. Peterkin respectively. On assuming the gavel the newly-installed W.M.
addressed the meeting appropriately to the occasion. At the request of the .brethren the Prov.G.M. presented
W. Bro. C. W. Nielsen, the retiring Master, with a particularly handsome gavel in token of their appreciation
of the efforts that had been exerted by him during the year. The recipient suitably acknowledged the gift. G.L.
having retired, and H.G.W. having been tendered, the Lodge was closed at 9.45 p.m., and the brethren
assembled in the banqueting hall, where to the enlivening strains of the pibroch they sat down to
refreshment. The usual toasts were honoured and responded to, a strong feature of this portion of the
proceedings being the instrumental and vocal items of the orchestra (which mustered in force), and Bros.
Naismith and Jago. The meeting from start to finish was admirably conducted and highly successful, and
marks the termination of a particularly prosperous and harmonious year, and appearances foreshadow a
continuance of satisfactory conditions.
The first ordinary meeting of the year was held on 21st December at 7.30 p.m., when the new W.M. (Bro. A.
W. Rowlands) was greeted by a very satisfactory attendance of members and visiting brethren. After
transaction of business of a formal nature, two G.L. circular appeals were considered, and sums of two
guineas each voted in support. The matter of contributing to the G.L. War Benevolent Fund was referred to
the Standing Committee to consider and report upon. The ceremonial work was to pass one brother, and this
was rendered by the W.M., assisted by W. Bro. O. Neilson (Apron Charge), W. Bro. G. W. Nielsen (S.E.
Address), Bro. W. Simpson and A. Schmidt (W.Ts. in concert with W.M.), and Bro. W. Simpson (F.C.). The
ceremony was well carried out, quite apart from the fact that it was the first effort of the new set of officers.
The orchestra, which attended in strong force, played melodies appropriate to the season. After receipt of
H.G.W. the Lodge was closed, and the brethren repaired to the refectory, where most enjoyable items were
contributed, and the toasts of King and Craft, absent brethren, the I.P.M., candidate, and visitors were
cordially honoured.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Rangitikei, No. 38.—The annual meeting was held at Bulls on the afternoon of 28th October. W. Bro. G. W.
McKenzie presiding. A large attendance of members, besides visitors representing sister Lodges, assembled
to congratulate the Master-elect, Bro. K. W. Deighton, and to assist in the ceremony of his installation. R.W.
Bro. T. A. Peterkin, Prov.G.M., was in attendance, and was heartily welcomed. After receiving the honours
due to his exalted rank, the Prov.G.M. intimated that the installation ceremony would be conducted by W.
Bro, J. H. Perrett, who then proceeded with the work, which was performed in a manner leaving nothing to
be desired. W. Bro. W. J. Phillips, as D. of C., filled that important office with credit. The W.Ts. were
presented by W. Bro. W. A. Bailey (Feilding), W. Bro. C. S. Rush (Manawatu Kil.), and W. Bro. T. Chisholm
(Rangatira). The officers for the ensuing year were invested by the newly-elected W.M., who was particularly
happy in his remarks to the individual office-bearers whom he had chosen to assist him in controlling and
managing the affairs of the Lodge, The officers for the ensuing year are ;—I.P.M„ W. Bro. G. W. McKenzie;
S.W., Bro. Geo. Williams; S.W., Bro. R. Chisholm; Sec., W. Bro. T. King, P.M.; Treas., W. Bro. J. E. Walker,
P.M. ; Chaplain, W. Bro. J. Anderson, P.M. ; Organist, W. Bro. J. H. Perrett, P.M.; D. of C., W. Bro. W. J.
Phillips, P.M.; S.D., Bro. G. H. Hathaway; J.D., Bro. H. J. Fagan; I.G., Bro. A. E. Eglinton ; Tyler, Bro. L. R.
Mehelvie; S.S., Bro. M. D. James ; J.S., Bro. A. K. Drew. The address to the W.M. was delivered by the
Prov.G.M., that to the Wardens by W. Bro. W. J. Croucher, G.S. while W. Bro. T. King addressed the brethren.
Before the Lodge closed W. Bro. J. Anderson was made the recipient of a P.M.'s jewel as a slight recognition
by the brethren of the assiduity with which he has applied himself in promoting the best interests of the
Lodge in various capacities for a number of years. A collection on behalf of aged and indigent Freemasons
realised a substantial sum. The social evening which usually follows an installation at Lodge Rangitikei was
dispensed with on this occasion.—{Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Ulster, No. 62.—The regular meeting was held in the Masonic Hall, Petone, on 16th December, W. Bro. G.
D. McEwen presiding. The ceremonial work was to pass two brethren. This was ably performed by the
W.M., assisted by Bro. C. A. Strong, J.W. (S.E. Charge), W. Bro. R. Wylie (W.Ts.), and Bro. W. H. Richards,
S.W. (Final Charge). The lecture on the 1st T.B. was very ably delivered by W. Bro. R. Colquitt. The Lodge
was closed at 9.45 p.m., and a very pleasant time was spent in the "Fourth." This being the last meeting of
the year seasonable toasts were duly honoured, interspersed with songs, etc.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Tutanekai, No. 156.—The regular meeting was held on 4th December in the Masonic Hall, Berhampore. W.
Bro. P. C. Watt, W.M., presided over a large attendance of the brethren, including the W.M. of Lodge Otari
and visitors from other Lodges. A donation was made to G.L. circular appeal. The business was the initiation
of three candidates, including J. A. Burgess, of H.M.S. Phyche, for whom a special dispensation was granted,
owing to his leaving Now Zealand for the seat of war. Ballots were taken for two joining members, and
proved favourable in each instance. The ceremony of initiation was performed by the W.M., Bro. P. C. Watt,
who duly Obligated the candidates. The S., T., and W. were given by W. Bro. A. Spicer, P.M.; the Apron
Charge by W. Bro. M. G. Fisher, P.M.; N.E. Corner by Bro. E. Howell, Treas.; Reasons for Prep., by Bro. C.
W. Martin, I.G.; W.Ts., by Bro. J. W. Sexton, S.D.; Charter, Constitution, and By-laws, presented by the
W.M.; Final Charge, by Bro. A. A. Whitelaw, J.W. Nominations of officers were taken for ensuing year, and
one proposition for joining member. After H.G.W. the Lodge closed, an enjoyable hour being spent in the
refectory.
An emergency meeting was also held on 18th December. The business consisted of raising two brethren. The
W.M., Bro. P. C. Watt, handed the gavel to W. Bro. H. Ivory, P.M., to work the degree. He was ably assisted
by R.W. Bro. T. A. Peterkin, Prov.G.M., and M.W. Bro. H. J. Williams, P.G.M. and the P.Ms. of the Lodge. W.
Bro. J. P. Shand, P.M., acted as S.W.; W. Bro. A. Spicer, P.M., as J.W.; W. Bro. S. E. Harrap, I.P.M., as S.D.;
and W. Bro. T. Rowell, P.M., as J.D. The W.M. congratulated the P.Ms. on the manner in which the ceremony
was worked, passing special commendation to R.W. Bro. Peterkin, Prov.G.M., and M.W. Bro. Williams,
P.G.M., for their kindly interest and attendance, and expressing regret at their early departure from the
meeting to catch trains. A large number of visiting brethren were present, and after spending an enjoyable
programme in the Fourth Degree, expressed their pleasure at having spent an enjoyable and profitable
evening.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Hula, No. 171.—Since furnishing the last report to the CRAFTSMAN, the officers and members of the Lodge
responded to the kind invitation of Manawatu Kil., and worked a degree, two candidates being duly initiated
into the mysteries of the Craft. At the ordinary meeting on the 4th, the work consisted of passing a brother to
the F.C., the work being carried out by the W.M. (I.P.M. Bro. Stone); Final Charge by R.W. Bro. Reeking.
Two candidates were proposed for the next ballot. Bro. Johnstone, who had only recently taken his Third
Degree, has gone with the Expeditionary Force to the front, making two we have bid farewell to. The next
meeting to be held will be to receive nominations for officers for the ensuing year, when it is hoped a good
attendance will be recorded, it being a privilege all members ought to take advantage of if they have the
future welfare of their Lodge and Masonry generally at heart.—[Lodge Correspondent.]
————
Waiwhetu, No. 176.—The usual meeting was held at the Lower Hutt on 9th December, when there was a
good attendance of brethren. Amongst the visitors were the W.M. and officers of Lodge Brooklyn, whom we
were very pleased to see, and, as W. Bro. Arcus aptly said, it is a long way from Brooklyn to the Hutt, and it
is just as far from the Hutt to Brooklyn, but W. Bro. Arcus can rest assured we will repay his visit in force
some time in the near future, as we have fond memories of our last visit, when our motor bus refused to take
the hill, and we had to fall back on the common tram. But Brooklyn Lodge were not the only visitors, as at a
quarter past eight R.W. Bro. Peterkin, Prov.G.M., entered the Lodge with a bodyguard of two captains and
four non-commissioned officers from the Trentham camp, and as you, Bro. Editor, would be aware, our R.W.
brother looked a proud and happy man, as you know how patriotic a member of the Empire he is. R.W. Bro.
Peterkin apologised for his late arrival, and we accepted it, as we knew that after the arrival of the train he
had taken the visitors to his place to show them where the squashers grew, and also to refresh the inner man.
After the usual business, and the voting of a sum to a circular appeal, two brethren were passed to the degree
of F.C. W. Bro. Guiness Obligated, Bro. McLachlan Invested, R.W. Bro. Peterkin gave the address after
Investiture, W. Bro. Ayson gave the S.E. Charge, W. Bro. Monroe presented the W.Ts., and Bro. McLachlan
explained the 2nd T.B. The Lodge was closed in the Second Degree. W. Bro. Hobbs and W. Bro. Rishworth
were nominated as J.G.D. and G.Sd.B. in G.L. The Lodge was closed at 9.30 p.m. A very pleasant hour was
spent in the refectory, when the usual loyal and patriotic toasts were given. That of the visitors was ably
responded to by the W.M. of Brooklyn Lodge, W. Bro. Captain Munro (I.P.M. of Lodge Motua, 195), W.
Bro. Captain Houlker (of Victory Lodge, 40, Nelson), Bro. Sergt.-Major Taylor (N.Z.P.S., of Austral Lodge,
2534, E.C., South Africa), Sergt. Penrheys-Evans (Lodge Franklin, 58), Corporal Murray (of Lodge Taupiri,
118), and Corporal Maddren (of Lodge Hikurangi, 140), W. Bros. Munro's and Houlker's speeches being
well worth listening to, and they also expressed a wish that the Secs. of Lodges would send circulars out to
the camp so that the brethren there would know when the Lodges met in Wellington. Please accept heartiest
Christmas greetings from myself and Lodge Waiwhetu, and may the coming year be a prosperous and happy
one.—[Lodge Correspondent.] [Very heartily reciprocated.—Ed.C.]
————————
ROYAL ARCH CHAPTERS.
St. Augustine, No. 1.--The regular meeting was held in Christchurch on 9th December, V.E. Comp. W.
Broadly presiding. The business was the exaltation of one brother. V.E. Comp. W. Broadly obligated; V.E.
Comp. T. W. Lee gave from the Know ledge; V.E. Comp. T. Bailey, of Canterbury Kil., gave from the
Discovery; V.E. Comp. W. F. McLean gave P.G. and R.W.; V.E. Comp. A. H. Thorpe illustrated the Signs;
V.E. Comp. F. C. B. Bishop delivered the Charge, and M.E. Comp. S. C. Bingham the Lecture at the Altar.
Credit is due to all for the able manner in which the ceremony was conducted. Congratulations were tendered
to the Sojs. for the efficient way they did their part of the ceremony.—[Chapter Correspondent.]
————
Manawatu, No. 11.—The Chapter continues to make good headway, and is in a most flourishing condition,
which is most gratifying to the officers and members. Recently four Foxton brethren were exalted to the R.A.
Degree, the following meeting two candidates were advanced to the M.M. Degree, and one was successful at
the ballot for the next date of meeting. The members of the Chapter were pleased to receive a visit from the
old veteran, W. Bro. Hosking, from Ormondville, his renowned capabilities as a ritualist being too well
known to need any commenting upon, it being a treat to receive a visit from him and to have the privilege to
listen to his delivery of any work he is called upon to perform.— [Chapter Correspondent.]
————
Rawhiti, No. 30.—The monthly convocation was held on 7th December, V.E. Comp. W. Dobson, Z.,
presiding over a good attendance of members. One candidate was elected, another proposed, and certificates
were presented to several members. It was decided not to hold the usual convocation in January. The several
side degrees were conferred on two candidates by V.E. Comp. Gillespie, assisted by E. Comps. J. Craven and
F. Craven. An enjoyable hour was spent in the refectory, and occasion was taken to welcome Comp. Vernon
Smith, who has been absent from Dannevirke for some time, and consequently has not been able to attend
the Chapter. Passing reference was made to the fact that Comp. Smith bad, during his "temporary absence,"
taken unto himself a -life partner. In acknowledging the toast Comp. Smith expressed regret at not having
been able to attend the Chapter for some months, and laughingly admitted that, had he known what was in
store for him, he would have been tempted to have excused himself on that occasion.—[Chapter
Correspondent.]
W. BRO. F. C. B. BISHOP. ACTING GRAND SECRETARY. CHRISTCHURCH.